Lower social class in traditional and modern societies

The authors make a distinction between such concepts as ‘lower social class’ (‘lumpen-proletariat’), ‘criminal community’ and ‘cultural underground’, and identify significant differences between the lower social strata in traditional and modern societies. The single ‘lower social world’ of tradition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Yu Popov, A E Kapishin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2019-12-01
Series:RUDN journal of Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/20559/16638
id doaj-f4f5c6999d2f4df19db5f2765a38c825
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4f5c6999d2f4df19db5f2765a38c8252020-11-24T23:12:52ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972019-12-011919410710.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-94-10717321Lower social class in traditional and modern societiesM Yu Popov0A E Kapishin1Kuban State UniversityRUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia)The authors make a distinction between such concepts as ‘lower social class’ (‘lumpen-proletariat’), ‘criminal community’ and ‘cultural underground’, and identify significant differences between the lower social strata in traditional and modern societies. The single ‘lower social world’ of traditional societies had its own cults, culture and organization and was an opposite of the ‘upper social world’. The religious definition of its ritual impurity was the basis for discrimination and segregation of its members and social groups. In modern societies, the lower class disintegrates and cannot be considered a single social anti-system: its ‘fragments’ - the prison part of the criminal community, counter-cultural underground and forbidden sects - are not connected with each other; the upper privileged part of criminal communities (a system of patronages with horizontal and vertical social ties) became a part of the modern society elite. At the same time, the system of patron-client relations that invisibly permeates modern societies necessarily implies corruption, at least the ‘soft corruption’. The authors consider such a phenomenon as an ‘underground’ in modern societies defining it as countercultural groups consisting mainly of well-educated representatives of the middle-class. The article also describes the underground of the Soviet society before and after perestroika which cannot be defined as a lower class of the contemporary Russian society. In conclusion, the authors suggest that in the Russian culture there is a kind of refined image of the ‘social bottom’ that influenced scientific ideas about it and is based on the social representations of the lower social class in the traditional society.http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/20559/16638lower social classtraditional societycriminal communityundergroundmodern societycorruptionpatron-client relations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Yu Popov
A E Kapishin
spellingShingle M Yu Popov
A E Kapishin
Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
RUDN journal of Sociology
lower social class
traditional society
criminal community
underground
modern society
corruption
patron-client relations
author_facet M Yu Popov
A E Kapishin
author_sort M Yu Popov
title Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
title_short Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
title_full Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
title_fullStr Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
title_full_unstemmed Lower social class in traditional and modern societies
title_sort lower social class in traditional and modern societies
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN journal of Sociology
issn 2313-2272
2408-8897
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The authors make a distinction between such concepts as ‘lower social class’ (‘lumpen-proletariat’), ‘criminal community’ and ‘cultural underground’, and identify significant differences between the lower social strata in traditional and modern societies. The single ‘lower social world’ of traditional societies had its own cults, culture and organization and was an opposite of the ‘upper social world’. The religious definition of its ritual impurity was the basis for discrimination and segregation of its members and social groups. In modern societies, the lower class disintegrates and cannot be considered a single social anti-system: its ‘fragments’ - the prison part of the criminal community, counter-cultural underground and forbidden sects - are not connected with each other; the upper privileged part of criminal communities (a system of patronages with horizontal and vertical social ties) became a part of the modern society elite. At the same time, the system of patron-client relations that invisibly permeates modern societies necessarily implies corruption, at least the ‘soft corruption’. The authors consider such a phenomenon as an ‘underground’ in modern societies defining it as countercultural groups consisting mainly of well-educated representatives of the middle-class. The article also describes the underground of the Soviet society before and after perestroika which cannot be defined as a lower class of the contemporary Russian society. In conclusion, the authors suggest that in the Russian culture there is a kind of refined image of the ‘social bottom’ that influenced scientific ideas about it and is based on the social representations of the lower social class in the traditional society.
topic lower social class
traditional society
criminal community
underground
modern society
corruption
patron-client relations
url http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/20559/16638
work_keys_str_mv AT myupopov lowersocialclassintraditionalandmodernsocieties
AT aekapishin lowersocialclassintraditionalandmodernsocieties
_version_ 1725600387417767936