Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments

<b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the effects of two different surface treatments and bonding agents on tensile bond strength between a Co-Cr and a Ni-Cr cast alloy and two resin-luting cements. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subject...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denizoglu Saip, Hanyaloglu Cem, Aksakal Bunyamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2009;volume=20;issue=2;spage=174;epage=179;aulast=Denizoglu
id doaj-f4efec7db9ea43389b7d359848fdd40f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4efec7db9ea43389b7d359848fdd40f2020-11-24T22:45:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032009-01-01202174179Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatmentsDenizoglu SaipHanyaloglu CemAksakal Bunyamin<b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the effects of two different surface treatments and bonding agents on tensile bond strength between a Co-Cr and a Ni-Cr cast alloy and two resin-luting cements. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subjected to surface treatments such as sandblasting, chemical etching, and sandblasting plus chemical etching. Panavia F and CandB cement were used as cementing mediums. The etching qualities were examined by a stereooptic microscope. Failure surfaces were examined throughout scanning electron microscopy. The data were evaluated using statistical methods, namely analysis of variance and multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD). <b> Results: </b> Significant differences were found in the bonding provided by the various cements (P &lt; 0.001) and also type of surface treatments (P &lt; 0.001). For all groups, sandblasted surfaces showed the highest bond strength values. There was no significant difference between the Cr-Co and the Cr-Ni alloys (P &gt; 0.05). <b> Conclusions:</b> Panavia F showed higher tensile strength and the sandblasted samples possessed higher tensile strength.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2009;volume=20;issue=2;spage=174;epage=179;aulast=DenizogluAdhesionmetal casting alloyssurface treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denizoglu Saip
Hanyaloglu Cem
Aksakal Bunyamin
spellingShingle Denizoglu Saip
Hanyaloglu Cem
Aksakal Bunyamin
Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Adhesion
metal casting alloys
surface treatment
author_facet Denizoglu Saip
Hanyaloglu Cem
Aksakal Bunyamin
author_sort Denizoglu Saip
title Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
title_short Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
title_full Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
title_fullStr Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
title_full_unstemmed Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
title_sort tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the effects of two different surface treatments and bonding agents on tensile bond strength between a Co-Cr and a Ni-Cr cast alloy and two resin-luting cements. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subjected to surface treatments such as sandblasting, chemical etching, and sandblasting plus chemical etching. Panavia F and CandB cement were used as cementing mediums. The etching qualities were examined by a stereooptic microscope. Failure surfaces were examined throughout scanning electron microscopy. The data were evaluated using statistical methods, namely analysis of variance and multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD). <b> Results: </b> Significant differences were found in the bonding provided by the various cements (P &lt; 0.001) and also type of surface treatments (P &lt; 0.001). For all groups, sandblasted surfaces showed the highest bond strength values. There was no significant difference between the Cr-Co and the Cr-Ni alloys (P &gt; 0.05). <b> Conclusions:</b> Panavia F showed higher tensile strength and the sandblasted samples possessed higher tensile strength.
topic Adhesion
metal casting alloys
surface treatment
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2009;volume=20;issue=2;spage=174;epage=179;aulast=Denizoglu
work_keys_str_mv AT denizoglusaip tensilebondstrengthofcompositelutingcementstometalalloysaftervarioussurfacetreatments
AT hanyaloglucem tensilebondstrengthofcompositelutingcementstometalalloysaftervarioussurfacetreatments
AT aksakalbunyamin tensilebondstrengthofcompositelutingcementstometalalloysaftervarioussurfacetreatments
_version_ 1725689484657295360