HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY

Starting from the year 2002, the Turkish national regulatory agency hasundertaken an extensive role in the convergence efforts towards IFRS. In order tosupport the transition, the Turkish Capital Markets Board (TCMB) implementedseveralversionsof IFRS,regulatory practic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa N. Cagle, Çağnur Balsarı, Fatih Dalkılıç
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Social Sciences Research Society 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
Online Access:http://www.sobiad.org/ejournals/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS-2015_1/cagle.pdf
id doaj-f4eefdb894cd4fb09d846b7bf88bc071
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4eefdb894cd4fb09d846b7bf88bc0712020-11-25T00:47:54ZengSocial Sciences Research SocietyInternational Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies1309-80631309-80632015-01-01712015070103HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEYMelissa N. CagleÇağnur BalsarıFatih DalkılıçStarting from the year 2002, the Turkish national regulatory agency hasundertaken an extensive role in the convergence efforts towards IFRS. In order tosupport the transition, the Turkish Capital Markets Board (TCMB) implementedseveralversionsof IFRS,regulatory practices and compliance requirements- allover the course of 15 years. The first effort undertaken in the road to IFRStransition was the issuance of Series XI, No: 25 by the TCMB. However, SeriesXI, No: 25 was not fully compatible with the international standard set and SeriesXI, No: 27 was put into effect in order to allow the companies to refer to theoriginal IFRS when necessary. This has created three groups of reportingcompanies; Series XI, no: 25 users, IAS/IFRS users and mixed usersof both sets.Nobes (2006) states that there is a risk that the process of translation will changeor lose meaning from the original version of the standard and as these variousIFRS are given legal status in various countries, this approach can potentially leadto application differences between jurisdictions. In line with this argument, theaim of the current study is to discuss impact of these differences on financialreport comparability and analysis in Turkey.http://www.sobiad.org/ejournals/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS-2015_1/cagle.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa N. Cagle
Çağnur Balsarı
Fatih Dalkılıç
spellingShingle Melissa N. Cagle
Çağnur Balsarı
Fatih Dalkılıç
HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
author_facet Melissa N. Cagle
Çağnur Balsarı
Fatih Dalkılıç
author_sort Melissa N. Cagle
title HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
title_short HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
title_full HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
title_fullStr HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
title_full_unstemmed HAVE WE REALLY BEEN USING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS) SINCE 2005? CASE OF TURKEY
title_sort have we really been using the international financial reporting standards (ifrs) since 2005? case of turkey
publisher Social Sciences Research Society
series International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
issn 1309-8063
1309-8063
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Starting from the year 2002, the Turkish national regulatory agency hasundertaken an extensive role in the convergence efforts towards IFRS. In order tosupport the transition, the Turkish Capital Markets Board (TCMB) implementedseveralversionsof IFRS,regulatory practices and compliance requirements- allover the course of 15 years. The first effort undertaken in the road to IFRStransition was the issuance of Series XI, No: 25 by the TCMB. However, SeriesXI, No: 25 was not fully compatible with the international standard set and SeriesXI, No: 27 was put into effect in order to allow the companies to refer to theoriginal IFRS when necessary. This has created three groups of reportingcompanies; Series XI, no: 25 users, IAS/IFRS users and mixed usersof both sets.Nobes (2006) states that there is a risk that the process of translation will changeor lose meaning from the original version of the standard and as these variousIFRS are given legal status in various countries, this approach can potentially leadto application differences between jurisdictions. In line with this argument, theaim of the current study is to discuss impact of these differences on financialreport comparability and analysis in Turkey.
url http://www.sobiad.org/ejournals/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS-2015_1/cagle.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT melissancagle havewereallybeenusingtheinternationalfinancialreportingstandardsifrssince2005caseofturkey
AT cagnurbalsarı havewereallybeenusingtheinternationalfinancialreportingstandardsifrssince2005caseofturkey
AT fatihdalkılıc havewereallybeenusingtheinternationalfinancialreportingstandardsifrssince2005caseofturkey
_version_ 1725257879808638976