The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost

Flight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Møller Anders Pape
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-12-01
Series:European Journal of Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INT
id doaj-f4d23c557b0e42438293578f42a66616
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4d23c557b0e42438293578f42a666162020-11-24T21:56:14ZengSciendoEuropean Journal of Ecology1339-84742015-12-0111435110.1515/eje-2015-0006eje-2015-0006The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity costMøller Anders Pape0Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 362, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, FranceFlight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity cost of fleeing. This opportunity cost can be estimated as the difference in flight initiation distance (FID) between an individual engaged in eating rather than just loafing. I estimated FID of 55 species of birds when approached by a human whilst eating or loafing. There was highly significant variation in difference in FID between these two situations amongst species. Species eating mobile food that is difficult to catch showed little difference in FID between the two situations, whilst species eating immobile food such as seeds had longer FID when eating than when loafing. This difference was fully attributed to differences in relative eye size, because species that had longer FIDs when foraging rather than loafing had small eyes, whilst species with long FIDs when loafing rather than foraging had large eyes. Species with long FIDs, when foraging compared to loafing, had low adult annual survival rates and vice versa. This effect was independent of whether mobile or immobile food was consumed. These findings suggest that individuals of different species adjust their FID to the probability of adult survival and also that differences in visual acuity among species as reflected by eye size linked to differences in food mobility affect the opportunity cost of risk taking.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INTeye size flight initiation distance mobile prey opportunity cost risk taking survival rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Møller Anders Pape
spellingShingle Møller Anders Pape
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
European Journal of Ecology
eye size
flight initiation distance
mobile prey
opportunity cost
risk taking
survival rate
author_facet Møller Anders Pape
author_sort Møller Anders Pape
title The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
title_short The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
title_full The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
title_fullStr The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
title_full_unstemmed The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
title_sort value of a mouthful: flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
publisher Sciendo
series European Journal of Ecology
issn 1339-8474
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Flight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity cost of fleeing. This opportunity cost can be estimated as the difference in flight initiation distance (FID) between an individual engaged in eating rather than just loafing. I estimated FID of 55 species of birds when approached by a human whilst eating or loafing. There was highly significant variation in difference in FID between these two situations amongst species. Species eating mobile food that is difficult to catch showed little difference in FID between the two situations, whilst species eating immobile food such as seeds had longer FID when eating than when loafing. This difference was fully attributed to differences in relative eye size, because species that had longer FIDs when foraging rather than loafing had small eyes, whilst species with long FIDs when loafing rather than foraging had large eyes. Species with long FIDs, when foraging compared to loafing, had low adult annual survival rates and vice versa. This effect was independent of whether mobile or immobile food was consumed. These findings suggest that individuals of different species adjust their FID to the probability of adult survival and also that differences in visual acuity among species as reflected by eye size linked to differences in food mobility affect the opportunity cost of risk taking.
topic eye size
flight initiation distance
mobile prey
opportunity cost
risk taking
survival rate
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT mølleranderspape thevalueofamouthfulflightinitiationdistanceasanopportunitycost
AT mølleranderspape valueofamouthfulflightinitiationdistanceasanopportunitycost
_version_ 1725859145898262528