The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost
Flight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2015-12-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Ecology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-f4d23c557b0e42438293578f42a66616 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f4d23c557b0e42438293578f42a666162020-11-24T21:56:14ZengSciendoEuropean Journal of Ecology1339-84742015-12-0111435110.1515/eje-2015-0006eje-2015-0006The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity costMøller Anders Pape0Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 362, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, FranceFlight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity cost of fleeing. This opportunity cost can be estimated as the difference in flight initiation distance (FID) between an individual engaged in eating rather than just loafing. I estimated FID of 55 species of birds when approached by a human whilst eating or loafing. There was highly significant variation in difference in FID between these two situations amongst species. Species eating mobile food that is difficult to catch showed little difference in FID between the two situations, whilst species eating immobile food such as seeds had longer FID when eating than when loafing. This difference was fully attributed to differences in relative eye size, because species that had longer FIDs when foraging rather than loafing had small eyes, whilst species with long FIDs when loafing rather than foraging had large eyes. Species with long FIDs, when foraging compared to loafing, had low adult annual survival rates and vice versa. This effect was independent of whether mobile or immobile food was consumed. These findings suggest that individuals of different species adjust their FID to the probability of adult survival and also that differences in visual acuity among species as reflected by eye size linked to differences in food mobility affect the opportunity cost of risk taking.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INTeye size flight initiation distance mobile prey opportunity cost risk taking survival rate |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Møller Anders Pape |
spellingShingle |
Møller Anders Pape The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost European Journal of Ecology eye size flight initiation distance mobile prey opportunity cost risk taking survival rate |
author_facet |
Møller Anders Pape |
author_sort |
Møller Anders Pape |
title |
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
title_short |
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
title_full |
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
title_fullStr |
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
title_full_unstemmed |
The value of a mouthful: Flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
title_sort |
value of a mouthful: flight initiation distance as an opportunity cost |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
European Journal of Ecology |
issn |
1339-8474 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Flight initiation distance of animals when approached by a potential predator reflects the risk that an individual
is willing to take when the individual has to gauge the value of staying put relative to the cost of flight. I predicted
that this cost–benefit balance would depend on the opportunity cost of fleeing. This opportunity cost can
be estimated as the difference in flight initiation distance (FID) between an individual engaged in eating rather
than just loafing. I estimated FID of 55 species of birds when approached by a human whilst eating or loafing.
There was highly significant variation in difference in FID between these two situations amongst species. Species
eating mobile food that is difficult to catch showed little difference in FID between the two situations, whilst
species eating immobile food such as seeds had longer FID when eating than when loafing. This difference was
fully attributed to differences in relative eye size, because species that had longer FIDs when foraging rather
than loafing had small eyes, whilst species with long FIDs when loafing rather than foraging had large eyes.
Species with long FIDs, when foraging compared to loafing, had low adult annual survival rates and vice versa.
This effect was independent of whether mobile or immobile food was consumed. These findings suggest that
individuals of different species adjust their FID to the probability of adult survival and also that differences in
visual acuity among species as reflected by eye size linked to differences in food mobility affect the opportunity
cost of risk taking. |
topic |
eye size flight initiation distance mobile prey opportunity cost risk taking survival rate |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eje.2015.1.issue-1/eje-2015-0006/eje-2015-0006.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mølleranderspape thevalueofamouthfulflightinitiationdistanceasanopportunitycost AT mølleranderspape valueofamouthfulflightinitiationdistanceasanopportunitycost |
_version_ |
1725859145898262528 |