High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators
Background:. Thermal imaging was first reported as a method for detection of arterial perforators in 1968 and has since been shown to be an extremely accurate way to assess perforators with an audible Doppler signal, using high-end professional thermal cameras. This technology has recently become ea...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003175 |
id |
doaj-f4c6b2a24f804fbbb3940b5bf742286a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f4c6b2a24f804fbbb3940b5bf742286a2020-12-23T08:14:28ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-10-01810e317510.1097/GOX.0000000000003175202010000-00044High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial PerforatorsMagnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, MD0Monica Nielsen, DVM1Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, DMSc, MD2From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark† Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkFrom the * Department of Plastic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, DenmarkBackground:. Thermal imaging was first reported as a method for detection of arterial perforators in 1968 and has since been shown to be an extremely accurate way to assess perforators with an audible Doppler signal, using high-end professional thermal cameras. This technology has recently become easily accessible with the advent of smartphone-compatible, low-end thermal cameras. Several groups have reported on the use of these devices in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phase, yet there have been few attempts to validate them against existing methods or compare them with high-end thermal cameras. Methods:. The aim of this study was to compare a low-end smartphone-compatible thermal camera, the FLIR ONE Pro (ONEPro), priced US $400, with a high-end thermal camera the FLIR A35sc (A35sc), priced US $5000, for the detection of arterial perforators on the anterolateral thigh, using a handheld Doppler and Color Doppler Ultrasound to verify the results. Results:. We examined 23 thighs in 13 healthy volunteers and identified a total of 779 hotspots using both cameras. The A35sc identified on average 33.5 hotspots per thigh. The ONEPro identified on average 31.5 hotspots per thigh. Using a handheld Doppler, we confirmed 95.9% of hotspots identified with the ONEPro and 95.8% of hotspots identified with the A35sc. Using Color Doppler Ultrasound, we confirmed 95% of hotspots identified using the ONEPro and 94.9% of hotspots identified with the A35sc. Conclusion:. While the high-end camera identified slightly more hotspots, verification data were very similar for the 2 cameras, and for clinical purposes these differences are negligible.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003175 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Magnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, MD Monica Nielsen, DVM Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, DMSc, MD |
spellingShingle |
Magnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, MD Monica Nielsen, DVM Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, DMSc, MD High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
author_facet |
Magnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, MD Monica Nielsen, DVM Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, DMSc, MD |
author_sort |
Magnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, MD |
title |
High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators |
title_short |
High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators |
title_full |
High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators |
title_fullStr |
High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators |
title_full_unstemmed |
High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators |
title_sort |
high-end versus low-end thermal imaging for detection of arterial perforators |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
issn |
2169-7574 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Background:. Thermal imaging was first reported as a method for detection of arterial perforators in 1968 and has since been shown to be an extremely accurate way to assess perforators with an audible Doppler signal, using high-end professional thermal cameras. This technology has recently become easily accessible with the advent of smartphone-compatible, low-end thermal cameras. Several groups have reported on the use of these devices in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phase, yet there have been few attempts to validate them against existing methods or compare them with high-end thermal cameras.
Methods:. The aim of this study was to compare a low-end smartphone-compatible thermal camera, the FLIR ONE Pro (ONEPro), priced US $400, with a high-end thermal camera the FLIR A35sc (A35sc), priced US $5000, for the detection of arterial perforators on the anterolateral thigh, using a handheld Doppler and Color Doppler Ultrasound to verify the results.
Results:. We examined 23 thighs in 13 healthy volunteers and identified a total of 779 hotspots using both cameras. The A35sc identified on average 33.5 hotspots per thigh. The ONEPro identified on average 31.5 hotspots per thigh. Using a handheld Doppler, we confirmed 95.9% of hotspots identified with the ONEPro and 95.8% of hotspots identified with the A35sc. Using Color Doppler Ultrasound, we confirmed 95% of hotspots identified using the ONEPro and 94.9% of hotspots identified with the A35sc.
Conclusion:. While the high-end camera identified slightly more hotspots, verification data were very similar for the 2 cameras, and for clinical purposes these differences are negligible. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003175 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT magnuspeturbjarnasonobinahmd highendversuslowendthermalimagingfordetectionofarterialperforators AT monicanielsendvm highendversuslowendthermalimagingfordetectionofarterialperforators AT lisbetrosenkrantzholmichdmscmd highendversuslowendthermalimagingfordetectionofarterialperforators |
_version_ |
1724372970492657664 |