Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces

Computer-generated (CG) faces are an important visual interface for human-computer interaction in social contexts. Here we investigated whether the human brain processes emotion and gaze similarly in real and carefully matched CG faces. Real faces evoked greater responses in the fusiform face area t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jari Kätsyri, Beatrice de Gelder, Aline W. de Borst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:NeuroImage
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308079
id doaj-f4c4624ec23641439c17fa0dcd377771
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4c4624ec23641439c17fa0dcd3777712020-11-25T02:59:26ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722020-01-01204116216Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated facesJari Kätsyri0Beatrice de Gelder1Aline W. de Borst2Brain and Emotion Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; Corresponding author. Brain and Emotion Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.Brain and Emotion Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United KingdomComputer-generated (CG) faces are an important visual interface for human-computer interaction in social contexts. Here we investigated whether the human brain processes emotion and gaze similarly in real and carefully matched CG faces. Real faces evoked greater responses in the fusiform face area than CG faces, particularly for fearful expressions. Emotional (angry and fearful) facial expressions evoked similar activations in the amygdala in real and CG faces. Direct as compared with averted gaze elicited greater fMRI responses in the amygdala regardless of facial expression but only for real and not for CG faces. We observed an interaction effect between gaze and emotion (i.e., the shared signal effect) in the right posterior temporal sulcus and other regions, but not in the amygdala, and we found no evidence for different shared signal effects in real and CG faces. Taken together, the present findings highlight similarities (emotional processing in the amygdala) and differences (overall processing in the fusiform face area, gaze processing in the amygdala) in the neural processing of real and CG faces.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308079
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jari Kätsyri
Beatrice de Gelder
Aline W. de Borst
spellingShingle Jari Kätsyri
Beatrice de Gelder
Aline W. de Borst
Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
NeuroImage
author_facet Jari Kätsyri
Beatrice de Gelder
Aline W. de Borst
author_sort Jari Kätsyri
title Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
title_short Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
title_full Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
title_fullStr Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
title_full_unstemmed Amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
title_sort amygdala responds to direct gaze in real but not in computer-generated faces
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Computer-generated (CG) faces are an important visual interface for human-computer interaction in social contexts. Here we investigated whether the human brain processes emotion and gaze similarly in real and carefully matched CG faces. Real faces evoked greater responses in the fusiform face area than CG faces, particularly for fearful expressions. Emotional (angry and fearful) facial expressions evoked similar activations in the amygdala in real and CG faces. Direct as compared with averted gaze elicited greater fMRI responses in the amygdala regardless of facial expression but only for real and not for CG faces. We observed an interaction effect between gaze and emotion (i.e., the shared signal effect) in the right posterior temporal sulcus and other regions, but not in the amygdala, and we found no evidence for different shared signal effects in real and CG faces. Taken together, the present findings highlight similarities (emotional processing in the amygdala) and differences (overall processing in the fusiform face area, gaze processing in the amygdala) in the neural processing of real and CG faces.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919308079
work_keys_str_mv AT jarikatsyri amygdalarespondstodirectgazeinrealbutnotincomputergeneratedfaces
AT beatricedegelder amygdalarespondstodirectgazeinrealbutnotincomputergeneratedfaces
AT alinewdeborst amygdalarespondstodirectgazeinrealbutnotincomputergeneratedfaces
_version_ 1724702390859333632