Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study

Using event-related potentials, this study investigated how financial herding or antiherding affected the valuation of subsequent outcomes. For each trial, subjects decided whether to buy the stock according to its net money flow information which could be used to reflect the strength of buying powe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cuicui Wang, Jia Jin, João Paulo Vieito, Qingguo Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4760930
id doaj-f4c2b9819c734a63b814c9ef617f50ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4c2b9819c734a63b814c9ef617f50ea2020-11-24T22:48:01ZengHindawi LimitedComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience1687-52651687-52732017-01-01201710.1155/2017/47609304760930Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential StudyCuicui Wang0Jia Jin1João Paulo Vieito2Qingguo Ma3School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, ChinaBusiness School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, ChinaSchool of Business Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, PortugalNeuromanagement Lab, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaUsing event-related potentials, this study investigated how financial herding or antiherding affected the valuation of subsequent outcomes. For each trial, subjects decided whether to buy the stock according to its net money flow information which could be used to reflect the strength of buying power or selling power of the stock. The return on investment (ROI) as feedback included the increase or decrease percentage after subjects’ responses. Results showed that, compared with herding, antiherding induced larger discrepancies of FRN and P300 amplitude between positive ROI and negative ROI, indicating that individuals under antiherding condition had stronger motivation and paid more attention in the evaluation process of ROI. Moreover, only for positive ROI, the amplitudes of FRN and P300 were modulated by two kinds of behaviors. We suggested that individuals making antiherd decisions were more confident with their own ability and choices, which reduced the positive outcome prediction error and gave more mental resources to evaluate positive outcome. However, negative outcomes evoked no different motivational meaning and negative emotion for individuals between herding and antiherding. The study may provide new insights into neurocognitive processes of herding and antiherding in financial market.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4760930
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cuicui Wang
Jia Jin
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
spellingShingle Cuicui Wang
Jia Jin
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
author_facet Cuicui Wang
Jia Jin
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
author_sort Cuicui Wang
title Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
title_short Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
title_full Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
title_fullStr Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
title_full_unstemmed Antiherding in Financial Decision Increases Valuation of Return on Investment: An Event-Related Potential Study
title_sort antiherding in financial decision increases valuation of return on investment: an event-related potential study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
issn 1687-5265
1687-5273
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Using event-related potentials, this study investigated how financial herding or antiherding affected the valuation of subsequent outcomes. For each trial, subjects decided whether to buy the stock according to its net money flow information which could be used to reflect the strength of buying power or selling power of the stock. The return on investment (ROI) as feedback included the increase or decrease percentage after subjects’ responses. Results showed that, compared with herding, antiherding induced larger discrepancies of FRN and P300 amplitude between positive ROI and negative ROI, indicating that individuals under antiherding condition had stronger motivation and paid more attention in the evaluation process of ROI. Moreover, only for positive ROI, the amplitudes of FRN and P300 were modulated by two kinds of behaviors. We suggested that individuals making antiherd decisions were more confident with their own ability and choices, which reduced the positive outcome prediction error and gave more mental resources to evaluate positive outcome. However, negative outcomes evoked no different motivational meaning and negative emotion for individuals between herding and antiherding. The study may provide new insights into neurocognitive processes of herding and antiherding in financial market.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4760930
work_keys_str_mv AT cuicuiwang antiherdinginfinancialdecisionincreasesvaluationofreturnoninvestmentaneventrelatedpotentialstudy
AT jiajin antiherdinginfinancialdecisionincreasesvaluationofreturnoninvestmentaneventrelatedpotentialstudy
AT joaopaulovieito antiherdinginfinancialdecisionincreasesvaluationofreturnoninvestmentaneventrelatedpotentialstudy
AT qingguoma antiherdinginfinancialdecisionincreasesvaluationofreturnoninvestmentaneventrelatedpotentialstudy
_version_ 1725680142594867200