Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy

<p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Bartkowski, S. Bartke, N. Hagemann, B. Hansjürgens, C. Schröter-Schlaack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-08-01
Series:SOIL
Online Access:https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf
id doaj-f4a89030ec674286882d11cf6097ae99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4a89030ec674286882d11cf6097ae992021-08-04T07:29:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsSOIL2199-39712199-398X2021-08-01749550910.5194/soil-7-495-2021Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policyB. Bartkowski0S. Bartke1N. Hagemann2B. Hansjürgens3C. Schröter-Schlaack4Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyInternational Institute Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany<p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the four dimensions of the framework (target adequacy, object adequacy, instrument adequacy, and behavioural adequacy), we formulate guiding questions to be used when applying the framework to particular governance systems. We then demonstrate the use of GDF by applying it to the core of German agricultural soil policy. We show that for each framework dimension, the governance system exhibits deficits, particularly with respect to object adequacy and instrument adequacy. Furthermore, we use the GDF-based analysis to highlight research gaps. We find that stakeholder analyses are a central gap across GDF dimensions.</p>https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Bartkowski
S. Bartke
N. Hagemann
B. Hansjürgens
C. Schröter-Schlaack
spellingShingle B. Bartkowski
S. Bartke
N. Hagemann
B. Hansjürgens
C. Schröter-Schlaack
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
SOIL
author_facet B. Bartkowski
S. Bartke
N. Hagemann
B. Hansjürgens
C. Schröter-Schlaack
author_sort B. Bartkowski
title Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
title_short Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
title_full Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
title_fullStr Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
title_full_unstemmed Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
title_sort application of the governance disruptions framework to german agricultural soil policy
publisher Copernicus Publications
series SOIL
issn 2199-3971
2199-398X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description <p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the four dimensions of the framework (target adequacy, object adequacy, instrument adequacy, and behavioural adequacy), we formulate guiding questions to be used when applying the framework to particular governance systems. We then demonstrate the use of GDF by applying it to the core of German agricultural soil policy. We show that for each framework dimension, the governance system exhibits deficits, particularly with respect to object adequacy and instrument adequacy. Furthermore, we use the GDF-based analysis to highlight research gaps. We find that stakeholder analyses are a central gap across GDF dimensions.</p>
url https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bbartkowski applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy
AT sbartke applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy
AT nhagemann applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy
AT bhansjurgens applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy
AT cschroterschlaack applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy
_version_ 1721222497224884224