Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy
<p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-08-01
|
Series: | SOIL |
Online Access: | https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf |
id |
doaj-f4a89030ec674286882d11cf6097ae99 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f4a89030ec674286882d11cf6097ae992021-08-04T07:29:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsSOIL2199-39712199-398X2021-08-01749550910.5194/soil-7-495-2021Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policyB. Bartkowski0S. Bartke1N. Hagemann2B. Hansjürgens3C. Schröter-Schlaack4Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyInternational Institute Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany<p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the four dimensions of the framework (target adequacy, object adequacy, instrument adequacy, and behavioural adequacy), we formulate guiding questions to be used when applying the framework to particular governance systems. We then demonstrate the use of GDF by applying it to the core of German agricultural soil policy. We show that for each framework dimension, the governance system exhibits deficits, particularly with respect to object adequacy and instrument adequacy. Furthermore, we use the GDF-based analysis to highlight research gaps. We find that stakeholder analyses are a central gap across GDF dimensions.</p>https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
B. Bartkowski S. Bartke N. Hagemann B. Hansjürgens C. Schröter-Schlaack |
spellingShingle |
B. Bartkowski S. Bartke N. Hagemann B. Hansjürgens C. Schröter-Schlaack Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy SOIL |
author_facet |
B. Bartkowski S. Bartke N. Hagemann B. Hansjürgens C. Schröter-Schlaack |
author_sort |
B. Bartkowski |
title |
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy |
title_short |
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy |
title_full |
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy |
title_fullStr |
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of the governance disruptions framework to German agricultural soil policy |
title_sort |
application of the governance disruptions framework to german agricultural soil policy |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
SOIL |
issn |
2199-3971 2199-398X |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
<p>Governance of natural resources is inherently complex and requires
navigating trade-offs at multiple dimensions. In this paper, we present and
operationalize the “governance disruptions framework” (GDF) as a tool for
holistic analysis of natural resource governance systems. For each of the
four dimensions of the framework (target adequacy, object adequacy,
instrument adequacy, and behavioural adequacy), we formulate guiding
questions to be used when applying the framework to particular governance
systems. We then demonstrate the use of GDF by applying it to the core of
German agricultural soil policy. We show that for each framework dimension,
the governance system exhibits deficits, particularly with respect to object
adequacy and instrument adequacy. Furthermore, we use the GDF-based analysis
to highlight research gaps. We find that stakeholder analyses are a central
gap across GDF dimensions.</p> |
url |
https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/7/495/2021/soil-7-495-2021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bbartkowski applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy AT sbartke applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy AT nhagemann applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy AT bhansjurgens applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy AT cschroterschlaack applicationofthegovernancedisruptionsframeworktogermanagriculturalsoilpolicy |
_version_ |
1721222497224884224 |