Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study
Abstract Background Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/ ; De...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w |
id |
doaj-f4a0ee8bd10445b08712e0a889a664cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew Jones Fiona Bell Jonathan Benger Sarah Black Penny Buykx Simon Dixon Tim Driscoll Bridie Evans Adrian Edwards Gordon Fuller Steve Goodacre Rebecca Hoskins Jane Hughes Ann John Jenna Jones Chris Moore Fiona Sampson Alan Watkins Helen Snooks |
spellingShingle |
Matthew Jones Fiona Bell Jonathan Benger Sarah Black Penny Buykx Simon Dixon Tim Driscoll Bridie Evans Adrian Edwards Gordon Fuller Steve Goodacre Rebecca Hoskins Jane Hughes Ann John Jenna Jones Chris Moore Fiona Sampson Alan Watkins Helen Snooks Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
author_facet |
Matthew Jones Fiona Bell Jonathan Benger Sarah Black Penny Buykx Simon Dixon Tim Driscoll Bridie Evans Adrian Edwards Gordon Fuller Steve Goodacre Rebecca Hoskins Jane Hughes Ann John Jenna Jones Chris Moore Fiona Sampson Alan Watkins Helen Snooks |
author_sort |
Matthew Jones |
title |
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_short |
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_full |
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_fullStr |
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_sort |
protocol for take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency (time) settings: feasibility study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
issn |
2055-5784 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/ ; Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsrelatedtodrugpoisoninginenglandandwales/2018registrations ). Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in ‘kits’ for administration by witnesses in an overdose emergency. This intervention is known as take-home naloxone (THN). We know that THN can save lives on an individual level, but there is currently limited evidence about the effectiveness of THN distribution on an aggregate level, in specialist drug service settings or in emergency service settings. Notably, we do not know whether THN kits reduce deaths from opioid overdose in at-risk populations, if there are unforeseen harms associated with THN distribution or if THN is cost-effective. In order to address this research gap, we aim to determine the feasibility of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of THN distribution in emergency settings. Methods We will carry out a feasibility study for a RCT of THN distributed in emergency settings at four sites, clustered by Emergency Department (ED) and catchment area within its associated ambulance service. THN is a peer-administered intervention. At two intervention sites, emergency ambulance paramedics and ED clinical staff will distribute THN to adult patients who are at risk of opioid overdose. At two control sites, practice will carry on as usual. We will develop a method of identifying a population to include in an evaluation, comprising people at risk of fatal opioid overdose, who may potentially receive naloxone included in a THN kit. We will gather anonymised outcomes up to 1 year following a 12-month ‘live’ trial period for patients at risk of death from opioid poisoning. We expect approximately 100 patients at risk of opioid overdose to be in contact with each service during the 1-year recruitment period. Our outcomes will include deaths, emergency admissions, intensive care admissions, and ED attendances. We will collect numbers of eligible patients attended by participating in emergency ambulance paramedics and attending ED, THN kits issued, and NHS resource usage. We will determine whether to progress to a fully powered trial based on pre-specified progression criteria: sign-up of sites (n = 4), staff trained (≥ 50%), eligible participants identified (≥ 50%), THN provided to eligible participants (≥ 50%), people at risk of death from opioid overdose identified for inclusion in follow-up (≥ 75% of overdose deaths), outcomes retrieved for high-risk individuals (≥ 75%), and adverse event rate (< 10% difference between study arms). Discussion This feasibility study is the first randomised, methodologically robust investigation of THN distribution in emergency settings. The study addresses an evidence gap related to the effectiveness of THN distribution in emergency settings. As this study is being carried out in emergency settings, obtaining informed consent on behalf of participants is not feasible. We therefore employ novel methods for identifying participants and capturing follow-up data, with effectiveness dependent on the quality of the available routine data. Trial registration ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018) |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewjones protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT fionabell protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT jonathanbenger protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT sarahblack protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT pennybuykx protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT simondixon protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT timdriscoll protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT bridieevans protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT adrianedwards protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT gordonfuller protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT stevegoodacre protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT rebeccahoskins protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT janehughes protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT annjohn protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT jennajones protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT chrismoore protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT fionasampson protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT alanwatkins protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT helensnooks protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy |
_version_ |
1724649964207865856 |
spelling |
doaj-f4a0ee8bd10445b08712e0a889a664cb2020-11-25T03:12:32ZengBMCPilot and Feasibility Studies2055-57842020-07-016111010.1186/s40814-020-00626-wProtocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility studyMatthew Jones0Fiona Bell1Jonathan Benger2Sarah Black3Penny Buykx4Simon Dixon5Tim Driscoll6Bridie Evans7Adrian Edwards8Gordon Fuller9Steve Goodacre10Rebecca Hoskins11Jane Hughes12Ann John13Jenna Jones14Chris Moore15Fiona Sampson16Alan Watkins17Helen Snooks18Swansea UniversityYorkshire Ambulance ServiceUniversity of the West of EnglandSouth Western Ambulance Services NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of SheffieldSwansea UniversitySwansea UniversityCardiff UniversityUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of the West of EnglandUniversity of SheffieldSwansea UniversitySwansea UniversitySwansea UniversityUniversity of SheffieldSwansea UniversitySwansea UniversityAbstract Background Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/ ; Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsrelatedtodrugpoisoninginenglandandwales/2018registrations ). Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in ‘kits’ for administration by witnesses in an overdose emergency. This intervention is known as take-home naloxone (THN). We know that THN can save lives on an individual level, but there is currently limited evidence about the effectiveness of THN distribution on an aggregate level, in specialist drug service settings or in emergency service settings. Notably, we do not know whether THN kits reduce deaths from opioid overdose in at-risk populations, if there are unforeseen harms associated with THN distribution or if THN is cost-effective. In order to address this research gap, we aim to determine the feasibility of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of THN distribution in emergency settings. Methods We will carry out a feasibility study for a RCT of THN distributed in emergency settings at four sites, clustered by Emergency Department (ED) and catchment area within its associated ambulance service. THN is a peer-administered intervention. At two intervention sites, emergency ambulance paramedics and ED clinical staff will distribute THN to adult patients who are at risk of opioid overdose. At two control sites, practice will carry on as usual. We will develop a method of identifying a population to include in an evaluation, comprising people at risk of fatal opioid overdose, who may potentially receive naloxone included in a THN kit. We will gather anonymised outcomes up to 1 year following a 12-month ‘live’ trial period for patients at risk of death from opioid poisoning. We expect approximately 100 patients at risk of opioid overdose to be in contact with each service during the 1-year recruitment period. Our outcomes will include deaths, emergency admissions, intensive care admissions, and ED attendances. We will collect numbers of eligible patients attended by participating in emergency ambulance paramedics and attending ED, THN kits issued, and NHS resource usage. We will determine whether to progress to a fully powered trial based on pre-specified progression criteria: sign-up of sites (n = 4), staff trained (≥ 50%), eligible participants identified (≥ 50%), THN provided to eligible participants (≥ 50%), people at risk of death from opioid overdose identified for inclusion in follow-up (≥ 75% of overdose deaths), outcomes retrieved for high-risk individuals (≥ 75%), and adverse event rate (< 10% difference between study arms). Discussion This feasibility study is the first randomised, methodologically robust investigation of THN distribution in emergency settings. The study addresses an evidence gap related to the effectiveness of THN distribution in emergency settings. As this study is being carried out in emergency settings, obtaining informed consent on behalf of participants is not feasible. We therefore employ novel methods for identifying participants and capturing follow-up data, with effectiveness dependent on the quality of the available routine data. Trial registration ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w |