A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of cisplatin–gemcitabine with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods: This was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial in tre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Driesen, Marc Lambrechts, Kees Kraaij, Victoria Soldatenkova, Nadia Chouaki, Benoit Colinet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-05-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834013481021
id doaj-f479eedee3da4742a6f53a27506bae08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f479eedee3da4742a6f53a27506bae082020-11-25T03:17:43ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83401758-83592013-05-01510.1177/1758834013481021A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancerPeter DriesenMarc LambrechtsKees KraaijVictoria SoldatenkovaNadia ChouakiBenoit ColinetObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of cisplatin–gemcitabine with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods: This was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial in treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIA and IIIB LA-NSCLC. After three induction cycles with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m 2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 , two concurrent chemoradiotherapy cycles with gemcitabine 300 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 , and radiotherapy (63 Gy) were administered. The primary endpoint was response rate after induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Secondary endpoints included time to progressive disease (TtPD), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Overall, 49 patients (median age 63.4 years; 73.5% male; Karnofsky performance status scores of 80, 85, 90, and 100 [16.3%, 2.0%, 49.0%, and 32.7%, respectively]; disease stage IIIA or IIIB 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively) were enrolled and treated. Response rate was 38.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.2–53.8%). Median TtPD was 11.4 months (95% CI 9.4–12.9). Median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI 17.5–26.0), with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 70.8% and 43.7%, respectively. Overall, six patients discontinued from study treatment due to adverse events (AEs), of which two were serious AEs. The most relevant grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and grade 3 events related to radiation in acute chemoradiotherapy, e.g. dysphagia, radiation pneumonitis, and radiation esophagitis. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine (300 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin was associated with acceptable toxicity. The observed median OS time was 21.8 months. Response evaluation was difficult as in many cases it was not possible to differentiate tumor progression from local radiofibrosis.https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834013481021
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Driesen
Marc Lambrechts
Kees Kraaij
Victoria Soldatenkova
Nadia Chouaki
Benoit Colinet
spellingShingle Peter Driesen
Marc Lambrechts
Kees Kraaij
Victoria Soldatenkova
Nadia Chouaki
Benoit Colinet
A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
author_facet Peter Driesen
Marc Lambrechts
Kees Kraaij
Victoria Soldatenkova
Nadia Chouaki
Benoit Colinet
author_sort Peter Driesen
title A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_short A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_full A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A phase II single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort phase ii single-arm study of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine with thoracic radiation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
issn 1758-8340
1758-8359
publishDate 2013-05-01
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of cisplatin–gemcitabine with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods: This was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial in treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIA and IIIB LA-NSCLC. After three induction cycles with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m 2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 , two concurrent chemoradiotherapy cycles with gemcitabine 300 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 , and radiotherapy (63 Gy) were administered. The primary endpoint was response rate after induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Secondary endpoints included time to progressive disease (TtPD), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Overall, 49 patients (median age 63.4 years; 73.5% male; Karnofsky performance status scores of 80, 85, 90, and 100 [16.3%, 2.0%, 49.0%, and 32.7%, respectively]; disease stage IIIA or IIIB 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively) were enrolled and treated. Response rate was 38.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.2–53.8%). Median TtPD was 11.4 months (95% CI 9.4–12.9). Median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI 17.5–26.0), with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 70.8% and 43.7%, respectively. Overall, six patients discontinued from study treatment due to adverse events (AEs), of which two were serious AEs. The most relevant grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and grade 3 events related to radiation in acute chemoradiotherapy, e.g. dysphagia, radiation pneumonitis, and radiation esophagitis. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine (300 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin was associated with acceptable toxicity. The observed median OS time was 21.8 months. Response evaluation was difficult as in many cases it was not possible to differentiate tumor progression from local radiofibrosis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834013481021
work_keys_str_mv AT peterdriesen aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT marclambrechts aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT keeskraaij aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT victoriasoldatenkova aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nadiachouaki aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT benoitcolinet aphaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT peterdriesen phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT marclambrechts phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT keeskraaij phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT victoriasoldatenkova phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nadiachouaki phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT benoitcolinet phaseiisinglearmstudyofinductionchemotherapywithcisplatinandgemcitabinefollowedbyconcurrentcisplatinandgemcitabinewiththoracicradiationforunresectablelocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
_version_ 1724630448065216512