Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity

Background Anergy is a key mechanism controlling expression of autoreactive B cells and a major site for failed regulation in autoimmune diseases. Yet the molecular basis for this differentiated cell state remains poorly understood. The current lack of well-characterized surface or molecular markers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy G. Clark, Katherine M. Mackin, Mary H. Foster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Biomarker Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S840
id doaj-f46f15b9ab74481fb36bbd4bc1063e3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f46f15b9ab74481fb36bbd4bc1063e3f2020-11-25T02:53:59ZengSAGE PublishingBiomarker Insights1177-27192008-01-01310.4137/BMI.S840Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of AutoimmunityAmy G. Clark0Katherine M. Mackin1Mary H. Foster2Departments of Medicine and Research Service, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.Departments of Medicine and Research Service, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.Departments of Medicine and Research Service, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.Background Anergy is a key mechanism controlling expression of autoreactive B cells and a major site for failed regulation in autoimmune diseases. Yet the molecular basis for this differentiated cell state remains poorly understood. The current lack of well-characterized surface or molecular markers hinders the isolation of anergic cells for further study. Global gene profiling recently identified transcripts whose expression differentiates anergic from naïve B cells in model mouse systems. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the molecular and cellular processes that differentiate anergic cells that develop in the healthy C57BL/6 (B6) milieu from those that develop in the autoimmune-prone MRL/MpJ (MRL) background. This approach takes advantage of B6 and MRL mice bearing an anti-laminin Ig transgene with a well characterized anergic B cell phenotype. Results Global gene expression was evaluated in purified transgenic B cells using Operon version 3.0 oligonucleotide microarray assaying > 31,000 oligoprobes. Genes with a 2-fold expression difference in B6 as compared to MRL anergic B cells were identified. Expression of selected genes was confirmed using quantitative RT-PCR. This approach identified 43 probes corresponding to 37 characterized genes, including Ptpn22, CD74, Birc1f/Naip, and Ctla4, as differentially expressed in anergic B cells in the two strains. Gene Ontology classification identified differentiation, cell cycle, proliferation, development, apoptosis, and cell death as prominently represented ontology groups. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified two major networks incorporating 27 qualifying genes. Network 1 centers on beta-estradiol and TP53, and Network 2 encompasses RB1, p38 MAPK, and NFkB cell growth, proliferation, and cell cycle signaling pathways. Conclusion Using microarray analysis we identified 37 characterized genes and two functional pathways engaged in maintenance of B cell anergy for which expression is distorted by underlying autoimmune genetic susceptibility. This approach identifes a new biological role for multiple genes and potential new therapeutic targets in autoimmunity.https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S840
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy G. Clark
Katherine M. Mackin
Mary H. Foster
spellingShingle Amy G. Clark
Katherine M. Mackin
Mary H. Foster
Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
Biomarker Insights
author_facet Amy G. Clark
Katherine M. Mackin
Mary H. Foster
author_sort Amy G. Clark
title Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
title_short Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
title_full Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
title_fullStr Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
title_full_unstemmed Tracking Differential Gene Expression in MRL/MpJ versus C57BL/6 Anergic B Cells: Molecular Markers of Autoimmunity
title_sort tracking differential gene expression in mrl/mpj versus c57bl/6 anergic b cells: molecular markers of autoimmunity
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Biomarker Insights
issn 1177-2719
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Background Anergy is a key mechanism controlling expression of autoreactive B cells and a major site for failed regulation in autoimmune diseases. Yet the molecular basis for this differentiated cell state remains poorly understood. The current lack of well-characterized surface or molecular markers hinders the isolation of anergic cells for further study. Global gene profiling recently identified transcripts whose expression differentiates anergic from naïve B cells in model mouse systems. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the molecular and cellular processes that differentiate anergic cells that develop in the healthy C57BL/6 (B6) milieu from those that develop in the autoimmune-prone MRL/MpJ (MRL) background. This approach takes advantage of B6 and MRL mice bearing an anti-laminin Ig transgene with a well characterized anergic B cell phenotype. Results Global gene expression was evaluated in purified transgenic B cells using Operon version 3.0 oligonucleotide microarray assaying > 31,000 oligoprobes. Genes with a 2-fold expression difference in B6 as compared to MRL anergic B cells were identified. Expression of selected genes was confirmed using quantitative RT-PCR. This approach identified 43 probes corresponding to 37 characterized genes, including Ptpn22, CD74, Birc1f/Naip, and Ctla4, as differentially expressed in anergic B cells in the two strains. Gene Ontology classification identified differentiation, cell cycle, proliferation, development, apoptosis, and cell death as prominently represented ontology groups. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified two major networks incorporating 27 qualifying genes. Network 1 centers on beta-estradiol and TP53, and Network 2 encompasses RB1, p38 MAPK, and NFkB cell growth, proliferation, and cell cycle signaling pathways. Conclusion Using microarray analysis we identified 37 characterized genes and two functional pathways engaged in maintenance of B cell anergy for which expression is distorted by underlying autoimmune genetic susceptibility. This approach identifes a new biological role for multiple genes and potential new therapeutic targets in autoimmunity.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/BMI.S840
work_keys_str_mv AT amygclark trackingdifferentialgeneexpressioninmrlmpjversusc57bl6anergicbcellsmolecularmarkersofautoimmunity
AT katherinemmackin trackingdifferentialgeneexpressioninmrlmpjversusc57bl6anergicbcellsmolecularmarkersofautoimmunity
AT maryhfoster trackingdifferentialgeneexpressioninmrlmpjversusc57bl6anergicbcellsmolecularmarkersofautoimmunity
_version_ 1724723235510026240