Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?

Birds with altricial offspring need to feed them regularly, but each feeding visit risks drawing attention to the nest and revealing its location to potential predators. Synchronisation of visits by both parents has been suggested as a behavioural adaptation to reduce the risk of nest predation. Und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nyil Khwaja, Melanie Massaro, Thomas E. Martin, James V. Briskie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00389/full
id doaj-f46b57fb098f4cc2a3d4ba8595341fd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f46b57fb098f4cc2a3d4ba8595341fd62020-11-25T02:14:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2019-10-01710.3389/fevo.2019.00389468570Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?Nyil Khwaja0Nyil Khwaja1Melanie Massaro2Melanie Massaro3Thomas E. Martin4James V. Briskie5School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandBirdLife Australia, Broome Bird Observatory, Broome, WA, AustraliaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandSchool of Environmental Sciences, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, AustraliaU.S. Geological Survey, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United StatesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandBirds with altricial offspring need to feed them regularly, but each feeding visit risks drawing attention to the nest and revealing its location to potential predators. Synchronisation of visits by both parents has been suggested as a behavioural adaptation to reduce the risk of nest predation. Under this hypothesis, higher risk of nest predation favours greater synchrony of parental feeding visits. We investigated this prediction over three timescales using nestling provisioning data from 25 passerine species in Tasmania and New Zealand. We estimated the extent to which parents actively synchronised their visits to the nest by comparing observed patterns of synchrony with those expected to occur at random. We found that in general, species did not synchronise visits more often than expected by chance. Species varied in the tendency to synchronise visits, but this variation was not explained by likely predation pressure in the distant evolutionary past: New Zealand endemic species, which evolved in the absence of mammalian nest predators, synchronised their visits as often as species which evolved with more diverse predatory guilds. Nest predation risk has increased over time in New Zealand due to introduced predators, but synchrony in visits also was not explained by manipulated predation risk: visit synchrony was equivalent between a predator-removal site and a site where predators remained. However, within one New Zealand species, visit synchrony was higher for mainland populations, which have been exposed to predatory mammals for c.800 years, than for a population on an offshore island to which predatory mammals were never introduced. We conclude that breeding birds may have some capacity to adapt the synchrony with which they provision over short evolutionary timescales. However, the lack of synchrony in most species suggests that either asynchrony provides benefits that outweigh the greater risk of predation, or synchrony incurs costs not compensated by reduced predation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00389/fullAnthornis melanurabellbirdcomparative analysiscoordinationinvasive speciessynchronisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nyil Khwaja
Nyil Khwaja
Melanie Massaro
Melanie Massaro
Thomas E. Martin
James V. Briskie
spellingShingle Nyil Khwaja
Nyil Khwaja
Melanie Massaro
Melanie Massaro
Thomas E. Martin
James V. Briskie
Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Anthornis melanura
bellbird
comparative analysis
coordination
invasive species
synchronisation
author_facet Nyil Khwaja
Nyil Khwaja
Melanie Massaro
Melanie Massaro
Thomas E. Martin
James V. Briskie
author_sort Nyil Khwaja
title Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
title_short Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
title_full Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
title_fullStr Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
title_full_unstemmed Do Parents Synchronise Nest Visits as an Antipredator Adaptation in Birds of New Zealand and Tasmania?
title_sort do parents synchronise nest visits as an antipredator adaptation in birds of new zealand and tasmania?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
issn 2296-701X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Birds with altricial offspring need to feed them regularly, but each feeding visit risks drawing attention to the nest and revealing its location to potential predators. Synchronisation of visits by both parents has been suggested as a behavioural adaptation to reduce the risk of nest predation. Under this hypothesis, higher risk of nest predation favours greater synchrony of parental feeding visits. We investigated this prediction over three timescales using nestling provisioning data from 25 passerine species in Tasmania and New Zealand. We estimated the extent to which parents actively synchronised their visits to the nest by comparing observed patterns of synchrony with those expected to occur at random. We found that in general, species did not synchronise visits more often than expected by chance. Species varied in the tendency to synchronise visits, but this variation was not explained by likely predation pressure in the distant evolutionary past: New Zealand endemic species, which evolved in the absence of mammalian nest predators, synchronised their visits as often as species which evolved with more diverse predatory guilds. Nest predation risk has increased over time in New Zealand due to introduced predators, but synchrony in visits also was not explained by manipulated predation risk: visit synchrony was equivalent between a predator-removal site and a site where predators remained. However, within one New Zealand species, visit synchrony was higher for mainland populations, which have been exposed to predatory mammals for c.800 years, than for a population on an offshore island to which predatory mammals were never introduced. We conclude that breeding birds may have some capacity to adapt the synchrony with which they provision over short evolutionary timescales. However, the lack of synchrony in most species suggests that either asynchrony provides benefits that outweigh the greater risk of predation, or synchrony incurs costs not compensated by reduced predation.
topic Anthornis melanura
bellbird
comparative analysis
coordination
invasive species
synchronisation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00389/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nyilkhwaja doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
AT nyilkhwaja doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
AT melaniemassaro doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
AT melaniemassaro doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
AT thomasemartin doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
AT jamesvbriskie doparentssynchronisenestvisitsasanantipredatoradaptationinbirdsofnewzealandandtasmania
_version_ 1724900177950539776