Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single treatment session of acupuncture, when applied in addition to standard treatment for acute low back pain (ALBP), reduces the time to recovery compared with standard treatment alone.Design A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.Se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ibrahimu Mdala, Margreth Grotle, Trygve Skonnord, Holgeir Skjeie, Atle Klovning, Eline Aas, Arne Fetveit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e034157.full
id doaj-f46677ca1a6544edb520288401ca7633
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f46677ca1a6544edb520288401ca76332021-05-28T12:30:40ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-08-0110810.1136/bmjopen-2019-034157Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback studyIbrahimu Mdala0Margreth Grotle1Trygve Skonnord2Holgeir Skjeie3Atle Klovning4Eline Aas5Arne Fetveit6Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayGeneral Practice Research Unit (AFE), Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single treatment session of acupuncture, when applied in addition to standard treatment for acute low back pain (ALBP), reduces the time to recovery compared with standard treatment alone.Design A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.Setting Conducted at 11 Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) offices.Participants 171 adults aged 20–55 years seeking their GP for ALBP (≤14 days) between March 2014 and March 2017. Patients with secondary back pain and previous sick leave and acupuncture treatment was excluded.Interventions The participants were randomised to either the control group (CG) or the acupuncture group (AG) by online software. The CG received standard treatment according to the Norwegian guidelines, while the AG received one session of Western medical acupuncture treatment in addition to standard treatment. The statistician was blinded to group status.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was median days to recovery. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, global improvement, back-specific functional status, sick leave, medication and adverse effects.Results 185 participants were randomised, 95 in the CG and 90 in the AG. 14 participants did not receive the allocated intervention and 4 were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 167 participants were included in the analysis, 86 in the CG and 81 in the AG. The groups were similar according to baseline characteristics. The median time to recovery was 14 days for the CG and 9 days for the AG, HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.96), (p=0.089). No serious adverse effects were reported.Conclusions We did not find any statistically significant reduction in time-to-recovery after a single session of acupuncture for ALBP compared with standard care.Trial registration number NCT01439412.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e034157.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ibrahimu Mdala
Margreth Grotle
Trygve Skonnord
Holgeir Skjeie
Atle Klovning
Eline Aas
Arne Fetveit
spellingShingle Ibrahimu Mdala
Margreth Grotle
Trygve Skonnord
Holgeir Skjeie
Atle Klovning
Eline Aas
Arne Fetveit
Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
BMJ Open
author_facet Ibrahimu Mdala
Margreth Grotle
Trygve Skonnord
Holgeir Skjeie
Atle Klovning
Eline Aas
Arne Fetveit
author_sort Ibrahimu Mdala
title Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
title_short Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
title_full Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
title_fullStr Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
title_full_unstemmed Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the Acuback study
title_sort acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, multicentre intervention study in general practice—the acuback study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single treatment session of acupuncture, when applied in addition to standard treatment for acute low back pain (ALBP), reduces the time to recovery compared with standard treatment alone.Design A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.Setting Conducted at 11 Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) offices.Participants 171 adults aged 20–55 years seeking their GP for ALBP (≤14 days) between March 2014 and March 2017. Patients with secondary back pain and previous sick leave and acupuncture treatment was excluded.Interventions The participants were randomised to either the control group (CG) or the acupuncture group (AG) by online software. The CG received standard treatment according to the Norwegian guidelines, while the AG received one session of Western medical acupuncture treatment in addition to standard treatment. The statistician was blinded to group status.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was median days to recovery. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, global improvement, back-specific functional status, sick leave, medication and adverse effects.Results 185 participants were randomised, 95 in the CG and 90 in the AG. 14 participants did not receive the allocated intervention and 4 were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 167 participants were included in the analysis, 86 in the CG and 81 in the AG. The groups were similar according to baseline characteristics. The median time to recovery was 14 days for the CG and 9 days for the AG, HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.96), (p=0.089). No serious adverse effects were reported.Conclusions We did not find any statistically significant reduction in time-to-recovery after a single session of acupuncture for ALBP compared with standard care.Trial registration number NCT01439412.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e034157.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimumdala acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT margrethgrotle acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT trygveskonnord acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT holgeirskjeie acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT atleklovning acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT elineaas acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
AT arnefetveit acupunctureforacutenonspecificlowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentreinterventionstudyingeneralpracticetheacubackstudy
_version_ 1721424281034817536