Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
Various computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poor...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI |
id |
doaj-f465b11fa31042e395d8d82c8b5d2aa0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f465b11fa31042e395d8d82c8b5d2aa02021-03-04T09:59:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8680510.1371/journal.pone.0086805Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.Jian ChengZhao XuWenwu WuLi ZhaoXiangchen LiYanlin LiuShiheng TaoVarious computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poorly-studied or newly sequenced organisms remains challenging. In this study, a machine learning approach was applied reciprocally to predict the essential genes in 21 microorganisms. Results showed that training set selection greatly influenced predictive accuracy. We determined four criteria for training set selection: (1) essential genes in the selected training set should be reliable; (2) the growth conditions in which essential genes are defined should be consistent in training and prediction sets; (3) species used as training set should be closely related to the target organism; and (4) organisms used as training and prediction sets should exhibit similar phenotypes or lifestyles. We then analyzed the performance of an incomplete training set and an integrated training set with multiple organisms. We found that the size of the training set should be at least 10% of the total genes to yield accurate predictions. Additionally, the integrated training sets exhibited remarkable increase in stability and accuracy compared with single sets. Finally, we compared the performance of the integrated training sets with the four criteria and with random selection. The results revealed that a rational selection of training sets based on our criteria yields better performance than random selection. Thus, our results provide empirical guidance on training set selection for the identification of essential genes on a genome-wide scale.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jian Cheng Zhao Xu Wenwu Wu Li Zhao Xiangchen Li Yanlin Liu Shiheng Tao |
spellingShingle |
Jian Cheng Zhao Xu Wenwu Wu Li Zhao Xiangchen Li Yanlin Liu Shiheng Tao Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jian Cheng Zhao Xu Wenwu Wu Li Zhao Xiangchen Li Yanlin Liu Shiheng Tao |
author_sort |
Jian Cheng |
title |
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
title_short |
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
title_full |
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
title_fullStr |
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
title_sort |
training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Various computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poorly-studied or newly sequenced organisms remains challenging. In this study, a machine learning approach was applied reciprocally to predict the essential genes in 21 microorganisms. Results showed that training set selection greatly influenced predictive accuracy. We determined four criteria for training set selection: (1) essential genes in the selected training set should be reliable; (2) the growth conditions in which essential genes are defined should be consistent in training and prediction sets; (3) species used as training set should be closely related to the target organism; and (4) organisms used as training and prediction sets should exhibit similar phenotypes or lifestyles. We then analyzed the performance of an incomplete training set and an integrated training set with multiple organisms. We found that the size of the training set should be at least 10% of the total genes to yield accurate predictions. Additionally, the integrated training sets exhibited remarkable increase in stability and accuracy compared with single sets. Finally, we compared the performance of the integrated training sets with the four criteria and with random selection. The results revealed that a rational selection of training sets based on our criteria yields better performance than random selection. Thus, our results provide empirical guidance on training set selection for the identification of essential genes on a genome-wide scale. |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiancheng trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT zhaoxu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT wenwuwu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT lizhao trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT xiangchenli trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT yanlinliu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes AT shihengtao trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes |
_version_ |
1714806764298305536 |