Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.

Various computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian Cheng, Zhao Xu, Wenwu Wu, Li Zhao, Xiangchen Li, Yanlin Liu, Shiheng Tao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI
id doaj-f465b11fa31042e395d8d82c8b5d2aa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f465b11fa31042e395d8d82c8b5d2aa02021-03-04T09:59:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8680510.1371/journal.pone.0086805Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.Jian ChengZhao XuWenwu WuLi ZhaoXiangchen LiYanlin LiuShiheng TaoVarious computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poorly-studied or newly sequenced organisms remains challenging. In this study, a machine learning approach was applied reciprocally to predict the essential genes in 21 microorganisms. Results showed that training set selection greatly influenced predictive accuracy. We determined four criteria for training set selection: (1) essential genes in the selected training set should be reliable; (2) the growth conditions in which essential genes are defined should be consistent in training and prediction sets; (3) species used as training set should be closely related to the target organism; and (4) organisms used as training and prediction sets should exhibit similar phenotypes or lifestyles. We then analyzed the performance of an incomplete training set and an integrated training set with multiple organisms. We found that the size of the training set should be at least 10% of the total genes to yield accurate predictions. Additionally, the integrated training sets exhibited remarkable increase in stability and accuracy compared with single sets. Finally, we compared the performance of the integrated training sets with the four criteria and with random selection. The results revealed that a rational selection of training sets based on our criteria yields better performance than random selection. Thus, our results provide empirical guidance on training set selection for the identification of essential genes on a genome-wide scale.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jian Cheng
Zhao Xu
Wenwu Wu
Li Zhao
Xiangchen Li
Yanlin Liu
Shiheng Tao
spellingShingle Jian Cheng
Zhao Xu
Wenwu Wu
Li Zhao
Xiangchen Li
Yanlin Liu
Shiheng Tao
Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jian Cheng
Zhao Xu
Wenwu Wu
Li Zhao
Xiangchen Li
Yanlin Liu
Shiheng Tao
author_sort Jian Cheng
title Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
title_short Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
title_full Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
title_fullStr Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
title_full_unstemmed Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
title_sort training set selection for the prediction of essential genes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Various computational models have been developed to transfer annotations of gene essentiality between organisms. However, despite the increasing number of microorganisms with well-characterized sets of essential genes, selection of appropriate training sets for predicting the essential genes of poorly-studied or newly sequenced organisms remains challenging. In this study, a machine learning approach was applied reciprocally to predict the essential genes in 21 microorganisms. Results showed that training set selection greatly influenced predictive accuracy. We determined four criteria for training set selection: (1) essential genes in the selected training set should be reliable; (2) the growth conditions in which essential genes are defined should be consistent in training and prediction sets; (3) species used as training set should be closely related to the target organism; and (4) organisms used as training and prediction sets should exhibit similar phenotypes or lifestyles. We then analyzed the performance of an incomplete training set and an integrated training set with multiple organisms. We found that the size of the training set should be at least 10% of the total genes to yield accurate predictions. Additionally, the integrated training sets exhibited remarkable increase in stability and accuracy compared with single sets. Finally, we compared the performance of the integrated training sets with the four criteria and with random selection. The results revealed that a rational selection of training sets based on our criteria yields better performance than random selection. Thus, our results provide empirical guidance on training set selection for the identification of essential genes on a genome-wide scale.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24466248/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT jiancheng trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT zhaoxu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT wenwuwu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT lizhao trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT xiangchenli trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT yanlinliu trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
AT shihengtao trainingsetselectionforthepredictionofessentialgenes
_version_ 1714806764298305536