Low salinity as a biosecurity tool for minimizing biofouling on ship sea chests

<p>Biofouling is a major vector in the transfer of non-native species around the world. Species can be transported on virtually all submerged areas of ships (e.g. hulls, sea chests, propellers) and so antifouling systems are used to reduce fouling. However, with increased regulation of bioc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. C. T. de Castro, T. Vance, A. L. E. Yunnie, T. W. Fileman, J. M. Hall-Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-07-01
Series:Ocean Science
Online Access:https://www.ocean-sci.net/14/661/2018/os-14-661-2018.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>Biofouling is a major vector in the transfer of non-native species around the world. Species can be transported on virtually all submerged areas of ships (e.g. hulls, sea chests, propellers) and so antifouling systems are used to reduce fouling. However, with increased regulation of biocides used in antifoulants (e.g. the International Maritime Organization tributyltin ban in 2008), there is a need to find efficient and sustainable alternatives. Here, we tested the hypothesis that short doses of low salinity water could be used to kill fouling species in sea chests. Settlement panels were suspended at 1.5&thinsp;m depth in a Plymouth marina for 24 months by which time they had developed mature biofouling assemblages. We exposed these panels to three different salinities (7, 20 and 33) for 2 hours using a model sea chest placed in the marina and flushed with freshwater. Fouling organism diversity and abundance were assessed before panels were treated, immediately after treatment, and then 1 week and 1 month later. Some native ascidian <i>Dendrodoa grossularia</i> survived, but all other macrobenthos were killed by the salinity 7 treatment after 1 week. The salinity 20 treatment was not effective at killing the majority of fouling organisms. On the basis of these results, we propose that sea chests be flushed with freshwater for at least 2 hours before ships leave port. This would not cause unnecessary delays or costs and could be a major step forward in improving biosecurity.</p>
ISSN:1812-0784
1812-0792