Diachrone Forschung am Buch Habakuk - am Beispiel von Hab 2,4-5
The short review shows that those exegetes, who make literary-critical differentiations, arrive at completely different conclusions. Such widely divergent hypotheses raise the question of the methods on which they are based. Literary-critical observations and claims shall be the reason to have a clo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
ArgeAss
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Protokolle zur Bibel |
| Online Access: | https://www.protokollezurbibel.at/index.php/pzb/article/view/2324 |
| Summary: | The short review shows that those exegetes, who make literary-critical differentiations, arrive at completely different conclusions. Such widely divergent hypotheses raise the question of the methods on which they are based. Literary-critical observations and claims shall be the reason to have a closer literary-critical look at the small section of Hab 2:4–5. Particularly interesting is the question whether the theological core V. 4 can be regarded as a unit or not. The result is that V. 4b (MT) is no part of the immediate context of Hab 2:4–5! It rather constitutes a partial text of its own. Due to the fact that this core verse obviously appears to be a secondary insertion, which originally did not belong to that context, it is legitimate and necessary to search for further contexts for its understanding. This can happen within the framework of a „canonical approach“. This methodological approach therefore receives its authorisation and justification from the literary-critical inhomogeneity of its direct context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2412-2467 |