The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life

The rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto litt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael V. Reiss, Noemi Festic, Michael Latzer, Tanja Rüedy
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Seismo Verlag 2021-06-01
Series:Studies in Communication Sciences
Subjects:
id doaj-f44e17c034ff4dab9c9b3fccf3868580
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f44e17c034ff4dab9c9b3fccf38685802021-07-15T12:44:25ZdeuSeismo VerlagStudies in Communication Sciences1424-48962296-41502021-06-012117190https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.005The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday lifeMichael V. Reiss0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-9985Noemi Festic1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-3639Michael Latzer2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-8863Tanja Rüedy3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-5511University of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZThe rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto little explored subjective relevance that Internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life. A representative online survey of Internet users comparatively reveals the relevance that users ascribe to algorithmic-selection applications and to their online and offline alternatives in five selected life domains: political and social orientation, entertainment, commercial transactions, socializing and health. The results show that people assign a relatively low relevance to algorithmic-selection applications compared to offline alternatives across the five life domains. The findings vary greatly by age and education. Altogether, such outcomes complement and qualify assessments of the social impact of algorithms that are primarily and often solely based on usage data and theoretical considerations.algorithmic governancealgorithmic selectionalgorithmssubjective relevanceeveryday lifesurvey datasocial media
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael V. Reiss
Noemi Festic
Michael Latzer
Tanja Rüedy
spellingShingle Michael V. Reiss
Noemi Festic
Michael Latzer
Tanja Rüedy
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
Studies in Communication Sciences
algorithmic governance
algorithmic selection
algorithms
subjective relevance
everyday life
survey data
social media
author_facet Michael V. Reiss
Noemi Festic
Michael Latzer
Tanja Rüedy
author_sort Michael V. Reiss
title The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
title_short The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
title_full The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
title_fullStr The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
title_full_unstemmed The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
title_sort relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
publisher Seismo Verlag
series Studies in Communication Sciences
issn 1424-4896
2296-4150
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto little explored subjective relevance that Internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life. A representative online survey of Internet users comparatively reveals the relevance that users ascribe to algorithmic-selection applications and to their online and offline alternatives in five selected life domains: political and social orientation, entertainment, commercial transactions, socializing and health. The results show that people assign a relatively low relevance to algorithmic-selection applications compared to offline alternatives across the five life domains. The findings vary greatly by age and education. Altogether, such outcomes complement and qualify assessments of the social impact of algorithms that are primarily and often solely based on usage data and theoretical considerations.
topic algorithmic governance
algorithmic selection
algorithms
subjective relevance
everyday life
survey data
social media
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelvreiss therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT noemifestic therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT michaellatzer therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT tanjaruedy therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT michaelvreiss relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT noemifestic relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT michaellatzer relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
AT tanjaruedy relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife
_version_ 1721301108373061632