The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life
The rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto litt...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Seismo Verlag
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Studies in Communication Sciences |
Subjects: |
id |
doaj-f44e17c034ff4dab9c9b3fccf3868580 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f44e17c034ff4dab9c9b3fccf38685802021-07-15T12:44:25ZdeuSeismo VerlagStudies in Communication Sciences1424-48962296-41502021-06-012117190https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.005The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday lifeMichael V. Reiss0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-9985Noemi Festic1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-3639Michael Latzer2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-8863Tanja Rüedy3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-5511University of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZUniversity of Zurich, Department of Communication and Media Research IKMZThe rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto little explored subjective relevance that Internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life. A representative online survey of Internet users comparatively reveals the relevance that users ascribe to algorithmic-selection applications and to their online and offline alternatives in five selected life domains: political and social orientation, entertainment, commercial transactions, socializing and health. The results show that people assign a relatively low relevance to algorithmic-selection applications compared to offline alternatives across the five life domains. The findings vary greatly by age and education. Altogether, such outcomes complement and qualify assessments of the social impact of algorithms that are primarily and often solely based on usage data and theoretical considerations.algorithmic governancealgorithmic selectionalgorithmssubjective relevanceeveryday lifesurvey datasocial media |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael V. Reiss Noemi Festic Michael Latzer Tanja Rüedy |
spellingShingle |
Michael V. Reiss Noemi Festic Michael Latzer Tanja Rüedy The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life Studies in Communication Sciences algorithmic governance algorithmic selection algorithms subjective relevance everyday life survey data social media |
author_facet |
Michael V. Reiss Noemi Festic Michael Latzer Tanja Rüedy |
author_sort |
Michael V. Reiss |
title |
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
title_short |
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
title_full |
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
title_fullStr |
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
title_sort |
relevance internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life |
publisher |
Seismo Verlag |
series |
Studies in Communication Sciences |
issn |
1424-4896 2296-4150 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
The rapidly growing academic and public attention to algorithmic-selection applications such as search engines and social media is indicative of their alleged great social relevance and impact on daily life in digital societies. To substantiate these claims, this paper investigates the hitherto little explored subjective relevance that Internet users assign to algorithmic-selection applications in everyday life. A representative online survey of Internet users comparatively reveals the relevance that users ascribe to algorithmic-selection applications and to their online and offline alternatives in five selected life domains: political and social orientation, entertainment, commercial transactions, socializing and health. The results show that people assign a relatively low relevance to algorithmic-selection applications compared to offline alternatives across the five life domains. The findings vary greatly by age and education. Altogether, such outcomes complement and qualify assessments of the social impact of algorithms that are primarily and often solely based on usage data and theoretical considerations. |
topic |
algorithmic governance algorithmic selection algorithms subjective relevance everyday life survey data social media |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelvreiss therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT noemifestic therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT michaellatzer therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT tanjaruedy therelevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT michaelvreiss relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT noemifestic relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT michaellatzer relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife AT tanjaruedy relevanceinternetusersassigntoalgorithmicselectionapplicationsineverydaylife |
_version_ |
1721301108373061632 |