Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507 |
id |
doaj-f445198482b743369bb333f9c2bc3a7c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f445198482b743369bb333f9c2bc3a7c2021-04-10T04:30:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024850710.1371/journal.pone.0248507Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.Sarah A HabibiLidya SalimScience communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sarah A Habibi Lidya Salim |
spellingShingle |
Sarah A Habibi Lidya Salim Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Sarah A Habibi Lidya Salim |
author_sort |
Sarah A Habibi |
title |
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
title_short |
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
title_full |
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
title_fullStr |
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
title_sort |
static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: a critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarahahabibi staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia AT lidyasalim staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia |
_version_ |
1714684761881968640 |