Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.

Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah A Habibi, Lidya Salim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507
id doaj-f445198482b743369bb333f9c2bc3a7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f445198482b743369bb333f9c2bc3a7c2021-04-10T04:30:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024850710.1371/journal.pone.0248507Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.Sarah A HabibiLidya SalimScience communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah A Habibi
Lidya Salim
spellingShingle Sarah A Habibi
Lidya Salim
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sarah A Habibi
Lidya Salim
author_sort Sarah A Habibi
title Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
title_short Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
title_full Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
title_fullStr Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
title_full_unstemmed Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
title_sort static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: a critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahahabibi staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia
AT lidyasalim staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia
_version_ 1714684761881968640