Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications

The importance of scale dynamics and scale mismatches for outcomes of natural resource management has been widely discussed. In this article we develop theoretically the concept of 'knowledge scales' and illustrate it through empirical examples. We define scales of knowledge as the tempora...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helene Ahlborg, Andrea J. Nightingale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2012-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art16/
id doaj-f4367f89e4fe414d8fb1b0fe7478d617
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4367f89e4fe414d8fb1b0fe7478d6172020-11-24T22:13:53ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872012-12-011741610.5751/ES-05171-1704165171Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy ImplicationsHelene Ahlborg0Andrea J. Nightingale1Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of TechnologyInstitute of Geography and the Lived Environment, School of GeoSciences, University of EdinburghThe importance of scale dynamics and scale mismatches for outcomes of natural resource management has been widely discussed. In this article we develop theoretically the concept of 'knowledge scales' and illustrate it through empirical examples. We define scales of knowledge as the temporal and spatial extent and character of knowledge held by individuals and collectives, and argue that disparate scales of knowledge are an important 'scale mismatch,' which together with scale politics, lead to conflicts in Nepalese forest management. We reveal how there are multiple positions within local knowledge systems and how these positions emerge through people's use of and relations to the forest, in a dynamic interaction between the natural environment and relations of power such as gender, literacy, and caste. Nepalese forestry is a realm in which power and scales of knowledge are being coproduced in community forestry, at the interface of material and symbolic practices in use of forest resources, and in contestations of social-political relations. Further, we reflect upon the importance of clear and precise use of scale concepts and present a methodological approach using triangulation for divergence, enabling researchers and practitioners involved in natural resource management to reveal scale mismatches and politics.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art16/community forestryknowledge scalesnatural resource managementNepalpowerscale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J. Nightingale
spellingShingle Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J. Nightingale
Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
Ecology and Society
community forestry
knowledge scales
natural resource management
Nepal
power
scale
author_facet Helene Ahlborg
Andrea J. Nightingale
author_sort Helene Ahlborg
title Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
title_short Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
title_full Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
title_fullStr Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
title_full_unstemmed Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
title_sort mismatch between scales of knowledge in nepalese forestry: epistemology, power, and policy implications
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The importance of scale dynamics and scale mismatches for outcomes of natural resource management has been widely discussed. In this article we develop theoretically the concept of 'knowledge scales' and illustrate it through empirical examples. We define scales of knowledge as the temporal and spatial extent and character of knowledge held by individuals and collectives, and argue that disparate scales of knowledge are an important 'scale mismatch,' which together with scale politics, lead to conflicts in Nepalese forest management. We reveal how there are multiple positions within local knowledge systems and how these positions emerge through people's use of and relations to the forest, in a dynamic interaction between the natural environment and relations of power such as gender, literacy, and caste. Nepalese forestry is a realm in which power and scales of knowledge are being coproduced in community forestry, at the interface of material and symbolic practices in use of forest resources, and in contestations of social-political relations. Further, we reflect upon the importance of clear and precise use of scale concepts and present a methodological approach using triangulation for divergence, enabling researchers and practitioners involved in natural resource management to reveal scale mismatches and politics.
topic community forestry
knowledge scales
natural resource management
Nepal
power
scale
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art16/
work_keys_str_mv AT heleneahlborg mismatchbetweenscalesofknowledgeinnepaleseforestryepistemologypowerandpolicyimplications
AT andreajnightingale mismatchbetweenscalesofknowledgeinnepaleseforestryepistemologypowerandpolicyimplications
_version_ 1716579200391970816