Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species

One strain of Lactobacillus brevis and four strains of Lactobacillus buchneri are each intended to improve ensiling at proposed doses ranging from 5 × 107 to 1 × 108 CFU/kg fresh material. Both bacterial species are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-04-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
QPS
Online Access:http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3168.pdf
id doaj-f4324428d7764c32a9118172195e8cd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4324428d7764c32a9118172195e8cd62021-05-02T01:28:57ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322013-04-0111410.2903/j.efsa.2013.3168Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all speciesEFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)One strain of Lactobacillus brevis and four strains of Lactobacillus buchneri are each intended to improve ensiling at proposed doses ranging from 5 × 107 to 1 × 108 CFU/kg fresh material. Both bacterial species are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of all strains was clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of these strains in silage production is presumed safe for livestock species, consumers of products from animals and the environment. Given the proteinaceous nature of the active agents and the high dusting potential of the products tested, the FEEDAP Panel considers it prudent to treat these additives as skin and respiratory sensitisers. They are also considered irritants. The efficacy of L. brevis to improve the preservation of nutritive value or increase the aerobic stability of silage was not demonstrated.. One strain of L. buchneri has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy, moderately difficult and difficult to ensile materials by reducing the pH and ammonia nitrogen and by increasing the preservation of dry matter. The remaining three strains of L. buchneri showed the potential to improve the aerobic stability, one in all forages and two in easy to ensile materials.http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3168.pdfTechnological additivesilage additiveLactobacillus brevisLactobacillus buchneriQPSsafetyefficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
EFSA Journal
Technological additive
silage additive
Lactobacillus brevis
Lactobacillus buchneri
QPS
safety
efficacy
author_facet EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
title Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
title_short Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
title_full Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>Lactobacillus brevis</em> (DSM 23231), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (DSM 22501), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (NCIMB 40788&#x97;CNCM I-4323), <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-6138) and <em>Lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ATCC PTA-2494) as silage additives for all species
title_sort scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of <em>lactobacillus brevis</em> (dsm 23231), <em>lactobacillus buchneri</em> (dsm 22501), <em>lactobacillus buchneri</em> (ncimb 40788&#x97;cncm i-4323), <em>lactobacillus buchneri</em> (atcc pta-6138) and <em>lactobacillus buchneri</em> (atcc pta-2494) as silage additives for all species
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2013-04-01
description One strain of Lactobacillus brevis and four strains of Lactobacillus buchneri are each intended to improve ensiling at proposed doses ranging from 5 × 107 to 1 × 108 CFU/kg fresh material. Both bacterial species are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of all strains was clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of these strains in silage production is presumed safe for livestock species, consumers of products from animals and the environment. Given the proteinaceous nature of the active agents and the high dusting potential of the products tested, the FEEDAP Panel considers it prudent to treat these additives as skin and respiratory sensitisers. They are also considered irritants. The efficacy of L. brevis to improve the preservation of nutritive value or increase the aerobic stability of silage was not demonstrated.. One strain of L. buchneri has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy, moderately difficult and difficult to ensile materials by reducing the pH and ammonia nitrogen and by increasing the preservation of dry matter. The remaining three strains of L. buchneri showed the potential to improve the aerobic stability, one in all forages and two in easy to ensile materials.
topic Technological additive
silage additive
Lactobacillus brevis
Lactobacillus buchneri
QPS
safety
efficacy
url http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3168.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonadditivesandproductsorsubstancesusedinanimalfeedfeedap scientificopiniononthesafetyandefficacyofemlactobacillusbrevisemdsm23231emlactobacillusbuchneriemdsm22501emlactobacillusbuchneriemncimb40788x97cncmi4323emlactobacillusbuchneriematccpta6138andemlactobacillusbuchneriematccpta2494assilageadditivesforallspeci
_version_ 1721496555860525056