The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary

Until now, scholars have generally doubted whether Johann Kuhnau, J. S. Bach’s predecessor as Thomaskantor in Leipzig, was indeed the author of the manuscript treatise, Fundamenta Compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Nevertheless the Fundamenta appears to originate from the Thomasschule around 1700, sug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frederik Kranemann, Derek Remeš
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Olms (only printed volumes 2003-2017) 2020-12-01
Series:Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://storage.gmth.de/zgmth/pdf/1086
id doaj-f42788a575814efab06eecccb7c8b7de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f42788a575814efab06eecccb7c8b7de2021-06-26T15:03:44ZdeuOlms (only printed volumes 2003-2017)Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 1862-67422020-12-0117216318010.31751/10861086The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and CommentaryFrederik KranemannDerek RemešUntil now, scholars have generally doubted whether Johann Kuhnau, J. S. Bach’s predecessor as Thomaskantor in Leipzig, was indeed the author of the manuscript treatise, Fundamenta Compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Nevertheless the Fundamenta appears to originate from the Thomasschule around 1700, suggesting that it may stem from Kuhnau’s broader circle. Moreover, recent research has revealed concordances between the Fundamenta and an anonymous manuscript titled Kurtze Verfaßung (“Brief Instruction”), in addition to a number of other sources. Thus, regardless of who compiled the Fundamenta, this manuscript is significant because it reveals the pedagogical priorities, or “fundamentals” (according to the title), that often lie buried in more discursive, theoretical treatises. Therefore the ultimate value of the Fundamenta is not its originality, but rather its explication of topics such as consonance and dissonance, modes, clausulae, cadences, invertible counterpoint, and fugue in a highly condensed, practical manner with numerous musical examples. The Fundamenta is thus an excellent resource for historically informed analysis and composition at the turn of the eighteenth century, before thoroughbass accompaniment displaced vocal polyphony as the dominant pedagogical paradigm in compositional instruction. Part one of this article explores the Fundamenta’s provenance in detail; part two provides a transcription and English translation.https://storage.gmth.de/zgmth/pdf/1086satzlehrecompositional theoryarchivforschungarchival studiesjohann kuhnauheinrich bokemeyergeorg österreich
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frederik Kranemann
Derek Remeš
spellingShingle Frederik Kranemann
Derek Remeš
The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie
satzlehre
compositional theory
archivforschung
archival studies
johann kuhnau
heinrich bokemeyer
georg österreich
author_facet Frederik Kranemann
Derek Remeš
author_sort Frederik Kranemann
title The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
title_short The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
title_full The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
title_fullStr The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
title_full_unstemmed The Fundamenta compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Edition, Translation, and Commentary
title_sort fundamenta compositionis jean kuhnaus 1703. edition, translation, and commentary
publisher Olms (only printed volumes 2003-2017)
series Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie
issn 1862-6742
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Until now, scholars have generally doubted whether Johann Kuhnau, J. S. Bach’s predecessor as Thomaskantor in Leipzig, was indeed the author of the manuscript treatise, Fundamenta Compositionis Jean Kuhnaus 1703. Nevertheless the Fundamenta appears to originate from the Thomasschule around 1700, suggesting that it may stem from Kuhnau’s broader circle. Moreover, recent research has revealed concordances between the Fundamenta and an anonymous manuscript titled Kurtze Verfaßung (“Brief Instruction”), in addition to a number of other sources. Thus, regardless of who compiled the Fundamenta, this manuscript is significant because it reveals the pedagogical priorities, or “fundamentals” (according to the title), that often lie buried in more discursive, theoretical treatises. Therefore the ultimate value of the Fundamenta is not its originality, but rather its explication of topics such as consonance and dissonance, modes, clausulae, cadences, invertible counterpoint, and fugue in a highly condensed, practical manner with numerous musical examples. The Fundamenta is thus an excellent resource for historically informed analysis and composition at the turn of the eighteenth century, before thoroughbass accompaniment displaced vocal polyphony as the dominant pedagogical paradigm in compositional instruction. Part one of this article explores the Fundamenta’s provenance in detail; part two provides a transcription and English translation.
topic satzlehre
compositional theory
archivforschung
archival studies
johann kuhnau
heinrich bokemeyer
georg österreich
url https://storage.gmth.de/zgmth/pdf/1086
work_keys_str_mv AT frederikkranemann thefundamentacompositionisjeankuhnaus1703editiontranslationandcommentary
AT derekremes thefundamentacompositionisjeankuhnaus1703editiontranslationandcommentary
AT frederikkranemann fundamentacompositionisjeankuhnaus1703editiontranslationandcommentary
AT derekremes fundamentacompositionisjeankuhnaus1703editiontranslationandcommentary
_version_ 1721358812967862272