Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance

This article is part of a multi-year study of governance structures in the midst of insecurity and organized crime in fragile sub-state regions, where in the absence of a strong state, non-state actors (like insurgents, traffickers and tribal warlords) engage in political and socioeconomic governanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annette Iris Idler, James J.F. Forest
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2015-01-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/289
id doaj-f423e01fcd8d4e0bbd6b86b3b3d74455
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f423e01fcd8d4e0bbd6b86b3b3d744552020-11-24T21:54:48ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272015-01-0141Art. 210.5334/sta.er132Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary GovernanceAnnette Iris Idler0James J.F. Forest1University of OxfordUniversity of Massachusetts LowellThis article is part of a multi-year study of governance structures in the midst of insecurity and organized crime in fragile sub-state regions, where in the absence of a strong state, non-state actors (like insurgents, traffickers and tribal warlords) engage in political and socioeconomic governance. Building on our prior work on West Africa and the Afghanistan-Pakistan tribal belt, this paper focuses on the Andean borderlands, drawing on recent fieldwork in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela. We explore patterns of behavior in which competition among violent non-state actors is not the norm. Instead, several instances were found in which violent non-state actors work collaboratively or have tacit non-interference agreements to provide public goods through arrangements we characterize as “complementary governance.” We therefore argue that, to understand how illicit authority emerges, it is not sufficient to consider one armed non-state actor in isolation or in a dichotomy to the state. As we contend, we have to take into account the complex connections and interactions among different (violent) non-state structures. Moving beyond state versus non-state governance to governance that is constitutive of various non-state groups, the perspective put forward in this article thus is aimed to enrich the current debate on governance and security.http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/289violent non-state actorsgovernancesecurityconflict
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annette Iris Idler
James J.F. Forest
spellingShingle Annette Iris Idler
James J.F. Forest
Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
violent non-state actors
governance
security
conflict
author_facet Annette Iris Idler
James J.F. Forest
author_sort Annette Iris Idler
title Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
title_short Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
title_full Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
title_fullStr Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance
title_sort behavioral patterns among (violent) non-state actors: a study of complementary governance
publisher Centre for Security Governance
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
issn 2165-2627
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This article is part of a multi-year study of governance structures in the midst of insecurity and organized crime in fragile sub-state regions, where in the absence of a strong state, non-state actors (like insurgents, traffickers and tribal warlords) engage in political and socioeconomic governance. Building on our prior work on West Africa and the Afghanistan-Pakistan tribal belt, this paper focuses on the Andean borderlands, drawing on recent fieldwork in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela. We explore patterns of behavior in which competition among violent non-state actors is not the norm. Instead, several instances were found in which violent non-state actors work collaboratively or have tacit non-interference agreements to provide public goods through arrangements we characterize as “complementary governance.” We therefore argue that, to understand how illicit authority emerges, it is not sufficient to consider one armed non-state actor in isolation or in a dichotomy to the state. As we contend, we have to take into account the complex connections and interactions among different (violent) non-state structures. Moving beyond state versus non-state governance to governance that is constitutive of various non-state groups, the perspective put forward in this article thus is aimed to enrich the current debate on governance and security.
topic violent non-state actors
governance
security
conflict
url http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/289
work_keys_str_mv AT annetteirisidler behavioralpatternsamongviolentnonstateactorsastudyofcomplementarygovernance
AT jamesjfforest behavioralpatternsamongviolentnonstateactorsastudyofcomplementarygovernance
_version_ 1725865632288735232