International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
Introduction The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescrib...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Swansea University
2018-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Population Data Science |
Online Access: | https://ijpds.org/article/view/798 |
id |
doaj-f40ef3f8df254819a31731296f1ce764 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f40ef3f8df254819a31731296f1ce7642020-11-24T23:11:37ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082018-08-013410.23889/ijpds.v3i4.798798International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record DataRobyn Tamblyn0Nadyne Girard1Bettina Habib2William Dixon3Meghna Jani4David Bates5Jennifer Haas6Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityMcGill Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityMcGill Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityThe University of ManchesterThe University of ManchesterBrigham and Women's HospitalBrigham and Women's Hospital Introduction The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescribing, or health system policies. Objective To determine if there are differences in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada. Approach Electronic health record data from Quebec, Canada (MOXXI), the United States (Partners Health Care, Boston MA), and the United Kingdom (CPRD random sample of 600,000) were used to identify new users of opiates (no prior prescription in 2 years), at least 18 years old between 2006-2016. Cancer patients were excluded after harmonizing equivalent READ and ICD9/10 codes. Generic drug names in each jurisdiction were mapped to the WHO ATC classification, and characterized using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Results Overall 655,877 new users were identified, of whom 78% of 58,286 (U.S.), 88% of 6,251 (Canada), and 96% of 600,000 (UK) were non-cancer patients. Mean age of new users was 49 (SD 16) in the US, 57 (SD 16) in Canada, and 52 (SD 19) in the UK. 57.6% (UK) to 67.3% (US) of new users were women. In the UK, 86.5% of patients were started on codeine (MME:0.15), compared to 43.9% in Canada and 8.5% in the U.S. In the U.S 65.0\% were started on oxycodone (MME:1.5), and 10.9% on hydrocodone (MME:1). In Canada, tramadol (18.2%; MME: 0.1) followed by oxycodone (13.2%) were the next most commonly prescribed drugs. Conclusion/Implications Substantial differences in opioid prescribing practices for non-cancer pain were observed between the UK and Canadian and United States sites. The predilection to start patients on more potent opiates in North America may be a contributing cause to the opiate epidemic. https://ijpds.org/article/view/798 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robyn Tamblyn Nadyne Girard Bettina Habib William Dixon Meghna Jani David Bates Jennifer Haas |
spellingShingle |
Robyn Tamblyn Nadyne Girard Bettina Habib William Dixon Meghna Jani David Bates Jennifer Haas International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data International Journal of Population Data Science |
author_facet |
Robyn Tamblyn Nadyne Girard Bettina Habib William Dixon Meghna Jani David Bates Jennifer Haas |
author_sort |
Robyn Tamblyn |
title |
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data |
title_short |
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data |
title_full |
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data |
title_fullStr |
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data |
title_sort |
international comparison in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care using electronic medical record data |
publisher |
Swansea University |
series |
International Journal of Population Data Science |
issn |
2399-4908 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
Introduction
The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescribing, or health system policies.
Objective
To determine if there are differences in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada.
Approach
Electronic health record data from Quebec, Canada (MOXXI), the United States (Partners Health Care, Boston MA), and the United Kingdom (CPRD random sample of 600,000) were used to identify new users of opiates (no prior prescription in 2 years), at least 18 years old between 2006-2016. Cancer patients were excluded after harmonizing equivalent READ and ICD9/10 codes. Generic drug names in each jurisdiction were mapped to the WHO ATC classification, and characterized using morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
Results
Overall 655,877 new users were identified, of whom 78% of 58,286 (U.S.), 88% of 6,251 (Canada), and 96% of 600,000 (UK) were non-cancer patients. Mean age of new users was 49 (SD 16) in the US, 57 (SD 16) in Canada, and 52 (SD 19) in the UK. 57.6% (UK) to 67.3% (US) of new users were women. In the UK, 86.5% of patients were started on codeine (MME:0.15), compared to 43.9% in Canada and 8.5% in the U.S. In the U.S 65.0\% were started on oxycodone (MME:1.5), and 10.9% on hydrocodone (MME:1). In Canada, tramadol (18.2%; MME: 0.1) followed by oxycodone (13.2%) were the next most commonly prescribed drugs.
Conclusion/Implications
Substantial differences in opioid prescribing practices for non-cancer pain were observed between the UK and Canadian and United States sites. The predilection to start patients on more potent opiates in North America may be a contributing cause to the opiate epidemic.
|
url |
https://ijpds.org/article/view/798 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robyntamblyn internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT nadynegirard internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT bettinahabib internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT williamdixon internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT meghnajani internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT davidbates internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata AT jenniferhaas internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata |
_version_ |
1725603527995162624 |