International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data

Introduction The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescrib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robyn Tamblyn, Nadyne Girard, Bettina Habib, William Dixon, Meghna Jani, David Bates, Jennifer Haas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2018-08-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/798
id doaj-f40ef3f8df254819a31731296f1ce764
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f40ef3f8df254819a31731296f1ce7642020-11-24T23:11:37ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082018-08-013410.23889/ijpds.v3i4.798798International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record DataRobyn Tamblyn0Nadyne Girard1Bettina Habib2William Dixon3Meghna Jani4David Bates5Jennifer Haas6Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityMcGill Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityMcGill Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill UniversityThe University of ManchesterThe University of ManchesterBrigham and Women's HospitalBrigham and Women's Hospital Introduction The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescribing, or health system policies. Objective To determine if there are differences in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada. Approach Electronic health record data from Quebec, Canada (MOXXI), the United States (Partners Health Care, Boston MA), and the United Kingdom (CPRD random sample of 600,000) were used to identify new users of opiates (no prior prescription in 2 years), at least 18 years old between 2006-2016. Cancer patients were excluded after harmonizing equivalent READ and ICD9/10 codes. Generic drug names in each jurisdiction were mapped to the WHO ATC classification, and characterized using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Results Overall 655,877 new users were identified, of whom 78% of 58,286 (U.S.), 88% of 6,251 (Canada), and 96% of 600,000 (UK) were non-cancer patients. Mean age of new users was 49 (SD 16) in the US, 57 (SD 16) in Canada, and 52 (SD 19) in the UK. 57.6% (UK) to 67.3% (US) of new users were women. In the UK, 86.5% of patients were started on codeine (MME:0.15), compared to 43.9% in Canada and 8.5% in the U.S. In the U.S 65.0\% were started on oxycodone (MME:1.5), and 10.9% on hydrocodone (MME:1). In Canada, tramadol (18.2%; MME: 0.1) followed by oxycodone (13.2%) were the next most commonly prescribed drugs. Conclusion/Implications Substantial differences in opioid prescribing practices for non-cancer pain were observed between the UK and Canadian and United States sites. The predilection to start patients on more potent opiates in North America may be a contributing cause to the opiate epidemic. https://ijpds.org/article/view/798
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robyn Tamblyn
Nadyne Girard
Bettina Habib
William Dixon
Meghna Jani
David Bates
Jennifer Haas
spellingShingle Robyn Tamblyn
Nadyne Girard
Bettina Habib
William Dixon
Meghna Jani
David Bates
Jennifer Haas
International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
International Journal of Population Data Science
author_facet Robyn Tamblyn
Nadyne Girard
Bettina Habib
William Dixon
Meghna Jani
David Bates
Jennifer Haas
author_sort Robyn Tamblyn
title International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
title_short International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
title_full International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
title_fullStr International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
title_full_unstemmed International Comparison in Opiate Prescribing for New Users in Primary Care using Electronic Medical Record Data
title_sort international comparison in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care using electronic medical record data
publisher Swansea University
series International Journal of Population Data Science
issn 2399-4908
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Introduction The opioid epidemic in North America has, in part, been attributed to an increase in opiate use for non-cancer pain and the prescription of more potent molecules. In contrast, the United Kingdom appears unaffected by this crisis, possibly because of differences in primary care prescribing, or health system policies. Objective To determine if there are differences in opiate prescribing for new users in primary care in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada. Approach Electronic health record data from Quebec, Canada (MOXXI), the United States (Partners Health Care, Boston MA), and the United Kingdom (CPRD random sample of 600,000) were used to identify new users of opiates (no prior prescription in 2 years), at least 18 years old between 2006-2016. Cancer patients were excluded after harmonizing equivalent READ and ICD9/10 codes. Generic drug names in each jurisdiction were mapped to the WHO ATC classification, and characterized using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Results Overall 655,877 new users were identified, of whom 78% of 58,286 (U.S.), 88% of 6,251 (Canada), and 96% of 600,000 (UK) were non-cancer patients. Mean age of new users was 49 (SD 16) in the US, 57 (SD 16) in Canada, and 52 (SD 19) in the UK. 57.6% (UK) to 67.3% (US) of new users were women. In the UK, 86.5% of patients were started on codeine (MME:0.15), compared to 43.9% in Canada and 8.5% in the U.S. In the U.S 65.0\% were started on oxycodone (MME:1.5), and 10.9% on hydrocodone (MME:1). In Canada, tramadol (18.2%; MME: 0.1) followed by oxycodone (13.2%) were the next most commonly prescribed drugs. Conclusion/Implications Substantial differences in opioid prescribing practices for non-cancer pain were observed between the UK and Canadian and United States sites. The predilection to start patients on more potent opiates in North America may be a contributing cause to the opiate epidemic.
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/798
work_keys_str_mv AT robyntamblyn internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT nadynegirard internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT bettinahabib internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT williamdixon internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT meghnajani internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT davidbates internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
AT jenniferhaas internationalcomparisoninopiateprescribingfornewusersinprimarycareusingelectronicmedicalrecorddata
_version_ 1725603527995162624