Erratum: Arbitrarily Loss-Tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Allowing a Demonstration over 1 km of Optical Fiber with No Detection Loophole [Phys. Rev. X 2, 031003 (2012)]

Erratum: Arbitrarily Loss-Tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Allowing a Demonstration over 1 km of Optical Fiber with No Detection Loophole [Phys. Rev. X 2, 031003 (2012)]

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	A. J. Bennet, D. A. Evans, D. J. Saunders, C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	American Physical Society 2016-03-01
Series:	Physical Review X
Online Access:	http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.019902

Similar Items

Arbitrarily Loss-Tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Allowing a Demonstration over 1 km of Optical Fiber with No Detection Loophole
by: A. J. Bennet, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)

Double Slit with an Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Pair
by: Bar Y. Peled, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Inequalities and Applications
by: Ying Yang, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Steering and Its Certification
by: Yi-Zheng Zhen, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Fast scrambling in holographic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair
by: Keiju Murata
Published: (2017-11-01)

Mercury dimer spectroscopy and an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment
by: Qu, Xinmei
Published: (2010)

Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
by: Benjamin Yadin, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Multipartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering and Quantum Information Processing
by: Yen-TeLu, et al.
Published: (2016)

Violation of Continuous-Variable Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering with Discrete Measurements
by: Schneeloch, James, et al.
Published: (2013)

Discrete-Event Simulation of an Extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Experiment
by: Hans De Raedt, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Distillation of Gaussian Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering with noiseless linear amplification
by: Han, D., et al.
Published: (2022)

Studies on the classical determinism predicted by A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2019-12-01)

Sudden death and revival of Gaussian Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering in noisy channels
by: Xiaowei Deng, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Polarisation plane studies of annihilation quanta from electron-positron pairs, with reference to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
by: Lowe, June
Published: (1979)

Transferring Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen State Cross Frequency Bands via Cavity Electro-Opto-Mechanical Converters
by: Junwen Luo, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Single-Photon-Memory Two-Step Quantum Secure Direct Communication Relying on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Pairs
by: Dong Pan, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Studies on A. Einstein , B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that ”quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” I: Basic methods
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2020-06-01)

Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2020-06-01)

Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” II: Apparent confirmation of the EPR argument
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2020-06-01)

Images jumelles quantiques : paradoxe de Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen dans des paires uniques d'images, et imagerie fantôme temporelle quantique
by: Denis, Séverine
Published: (2017)

Aspects spatiaux de l'intrication en amplification paramétrique : paradoxe Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen dans les images jumelles et expérience de Hong-Ou-Mandel.
by: Moreau, Paul-Antoine
Published: (2015)

Finding loopholes
by: DeJong, Andrea Aileen
Published: (2014)

Erratum: Patterns, correlates, and reduction of homework copying [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 010104 (2010)]
by: David J. Palazzo, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01)

Publisher’s Note: Electronics lab instructors’ approaches to troubleshooting instruction [Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 010102 (2017)]
by: Dimitri R. Dounas-Frazer, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01)

PODOLSKY'S ELECTRODYNAMICS UNDER A CHIRAL APPROACH ELECTRODINÁMICA DE PODOLSKY BAJO UN ENFOQUE QUIRAL
by: Héctor Torres-Silva
Published: (2008-11-01)

Erratum: Catalytic Quantum Randomness [Phys. Rev. X 8, 041016 (2018)]
by: P. Boes, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Editorial Note: Patterns, correlates, and reduction of homework copying [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 010104 (2010)]
by: David J. Palazzo, et al.
Published: (2010-08-01)

Erratum: Students’ difficulties with vector calculus in electrodynamics [Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020129 (2015)]
by: Laurens Bollen, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Bopp–Podolsky black holes and the no-hair theorem
by: R. R. Cuzinatto, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

No probability loophole in the CHSH
by: Richard D. Gill
Published: (2015-01-01)

Loophole ethics in sports
by: Øyvind Kvalnes, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Fractures and loopholes in Ratatouille
by: Analice Dutra Pillar, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Looking for Loopholes Processes of Incorporation of Illegal Immigrants in the Netherlands
Published: (2003)

The EMTALA Loophole in Psychiatric Care
by: Alexander Schmalz, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

A probability loophole in the CHSH
by: Han Geurdes
Published: (2014-01-01)

Act now to close chemical-weapons loophole
by: Shang, Lijun, et al.
Published: (2018)

Friedrich Rosen Orientalist Scholarship and International Politics
Published: (2020)

Erratum: Localization in Fractonic Random Circuits [Phys. Rev. X 9, 021003 (2019)]
by: Shriya Pai, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Flann O’Brien’s Creative Loophole
by: Germán Asensio
Published: (2015-03-01)

Publisher’s Note: Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey [Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 10, 020128 (2014)]
by: K. A. Douglas, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_38bh2smv13ieid4q0ust5hg83h