Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)

Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)

Graduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lawrence McNamara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6319-why-teaching-matters-and-technology-doesn-t-an-evaluation-and-review-of-web-based-lectures-flexible-delivery-in-a-first-year-law-subject-part-ii.pdf
id doaj-f3ef5e769afb4f4fb726d6083a060ca1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3ef5e769afb4f4fb726d6083a060ca12020-11-25T02:14:03ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-2839Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)Lawrence McNamaraGraduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article examines the benefits and disadvantages of an integrated and incremental approach to developing these attributes, and to teaching the generic and legally specific skills that underpin them in an undergraduate law program. The progress toward the integration of both generic and lawyering skills within the undergraduate law program at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) will be used as the exemplar for this article.http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6319-why-teaching-matters-and-technology-doesn-t-an-evaluation-and-review-of-web-based-lectures-flexible-delivery-in-a-first-year-law-subject-part-ii.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lawrence McNamara
spellingShingle Lawrence McNamara
Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
Legal Education Review
author_facet Lawrence McNamara
author_sort Lawrence McNamara
title Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
title_short Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
title_full Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
title_fullStr Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
title_full_unstemmed Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
title_sort why teaching matters and technology doesn't: an evaluation and review of web-based lectures (flexible delivery in a first year law subject, part ii)
publisher Bond University
series Legal Education Review
issn 1033-2839
description Graduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article examines the benefits and disadvantages of an integrated and incremental approach to developing these attributes, and to teaching the generic and legally specific skills that underpin them in an undergraduate law program. The progress toward the integration of both generic and lawyering skills within the undergraduate law program at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) will be used as the exemplar for this article.
url http://ler.scholasticahq.com/article/6319-why-teaching-matters-and-technology-doesn-t-an-evaluation-and-review-of-web-based-lectures-flexible-delivery-in-a-first-year-law-subject-part-ii.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencemcnamara whyteachingmattersandtechnologydoesntanevaluationandreviewofwebbasedlecturesflexibledeliveryinafirstyearlawsubjectpartii
_version_ 1724902298236223488

Similar Items