The Moral Choice Machine
Allowing machines to choose whether to kill humans would be devastating for world peace and security. But how do we equip machines with the ability to learn ethical or even moral choices? In this study, we show that applying machine learning to human texts can extract deontological ethical reasoning...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00036/full |
id |
doaj-f3d987797b9346628b60961cdbfed3ff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f3d987797b9346628b60961cdbfed3ff2020-11-25T03:23:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence2624-82122020-05-01310.3389/frai.2020.00036516840The Moral Choice MachinePatrick Schramowski0Cigdem Turan1Sophie Jentzsch2Sophie Jentzsch3Constantin Rothkopf4Constantin Rothkopf5Kristian Kersting6Kristian Kersting7Department of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute for Software Technology, Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyCentre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyDepartment of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyCentre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, GermanyAllowing machines to choose whether to kill humans would be devastating for world peace and security. But how do we equip machines with the ability to learn ethical or even moral choices? In this study, we show that applying machine learning to human texts can extract deontological ethical reasoning about “right” and “wrong” conduct. We create a template list of prompts and responses, such as “Should I [action]?”, “Is it okay to [action]?”, etc. with corresponding answers of “Yes/no, I should (not).” and "Yes/no, it is (not)." The model's bias score is the difference between the model's score of the positive response (“Yes, I should”) and that of the negative response (“No, I should not”). For a given choice, the model's overall bias score is the mean of the bias scores of all question/answer templates paired with that choice. Specifically, the resulting model, called the Moral Choice Machine (MCM), calculates the bias score on a sentence level using embeddings of the Universal Sentence Encoder since the moral value of an action to be taken depends on its context. It is objectionable to kill living beings, but it is fine to kill time. It is essential to eat, yet one might not eat dirt. It is important to spread information, yet one should not spread misinformation. Our results indicate that text corpora contain recoverable and accurate imprints of our social, ethical and moral choices, even with context information. Actually, training the Moral Choice Machine on different temporal news and book corpora from the year 1510 to 2008/2009 demonstrate the evolution of moral and ethical choices over different time periods for both atomic actions and actions with context information. By training it on different cultural sources such as the Bible and the constitution of different countries, the dynamics of moral choices in culture, including technology are revealed. That is the fact that moral biases can be extracted, quantified, tracked, and compared across cultures and over time.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00036/fullmoral biasfairness in machine learningtext-embedding modelsnatural language processingAImachine learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patrick Schramowski Cigdem Turan Sophie Jentzsch Sophie Jentzsch Constantin Rothkopf Constantin Rothkopf Kristian Kersting Kristian Kersting |
spellingShingle |
Patrick Schramowski Cigdem Turan Sophie Jentzsch Sophie Jentzsch Constantin Rothkopf Constantin Rothkopf Kristian Kersting Kristian Kersting The Moral Choice Machine Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence moral bias fairness in machine learning text-embedding models natural language processing AI machine learning |
author_facet |
Patrick Schramowski Cigdem Turan Sophie Jentzsch Sophie Jentzsch Constantin Rothkopf Constantin Rothkopf Kristian Kersting Kristian Kersting |
author_sort |
Patrick Schramowski |
title |
The Moral Choice Machine |
title_short |
The Moral Choice Machine |
title_full |
The Moral Choice Machine |
title_fullStr |
The Moral Choice Machine |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Moral Choice Machine |
title_sort |
moral choice machine |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence |
issn |
2624-8212 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Allowing machines to choose whether to kill humans would be devastating for world peace and security. But how do we equip machines with the ability to learn ethical or even moral choices? In this study, we show that applying machine learning to human texts can extract deontological ethical reasoning about “right” and “wrong” conduct. We create a template list of prompts and responses, such as “Should I [action]?”, “Is it okay to [action]?”, etc. with corresponding answers of “Yes/no, I should (not).” and "Yes/no, it is (not)." The model's bias score is the difference between the model's score of the positive response (“Yes, I should”) and that of the negative response (“No, I should not”). For a given choice, the model's overall bias score is the mean of the bias scores of all question/answer templates paired with that choice. Specifically, the resulting model, called the Moral Choice Machine (MCM), calculates the bias score on a sentence level using embeddings of the Universal Sentence Encoder since the moral value of an action to be taken depends on its context. It is objectionable to kill living beings, but it is fine to kill time. It is essential to eat, yet one might not eat dirt. It is important to spread information, yet one should not spread misinformation. Our results indicate that text corpora contain recoverable and accurate imprints of our social, ethical and moral choices, even with context information. Actually, training the Moral Choice Machine on different temporal news and book corpora from the year 1510 to 2008/2009 demonstrate the evolution of moral and ethical choices over different time periods for both atomic actions and actions with context information. By training it on different cultural sources such as the Bible and the constitution of different countries, the dynamics of moral choices in culture, including technology are revealed. That is the fact that moral biases can be extracted, quantified, tracked, and compared across cultures and over time. |
topic |
moral bias fairness in machine learning text-embedding models natural language processing AI machine learning |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00036/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patrickschramowski themoralchoicemachine AT cigdemturan themoralchoicemachine AT sophiejentzsch themoralchoicemachine AT sophiejentzsch themoralchoicemachine AT constantinrothkopf themoralchoicemachine AT constantinrothkopf themoralchoicemachine AT kristiankersting themoralchoicemachine AT kristiankersting themoralchoicemachine AT patrickschramowski moralchoicemachine AT cigdemturan moralchoicemachine AT sophiejentzsch moralchoicemachine AT sophiejentzsch moralchoicemachine AT constantinrothkopf moralchoicemachine AT constantinrothkopf moralchoicemachine AT kristiankersting moralchoicemachine AT kristiankersting moralchoicemachine |
_version_ |
1724605667696705536 |