Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery

Background. Our study aimed to review the role of deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option for defects in the head and neck region in the microvascular era. Methods. All patients who received DP flap reconstruction surgery at the Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, between 1999 and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. C. L. Chan, J. Y. W. Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Surgery Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/420892
id doaj-f3c5fd38588b4db7a6634492e7ee7fb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3c5fd38588b4db7a6634492e7ee7fb52020-11-24T22:35:07ZengHindawi LimitedSurgery Research and Practice2356-77592356-61242014-01-01201410.1155/2014/420892420892Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of MicrosurgeryR. C. L. Chan0J. Y. W. Chan1Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong KongDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong KongBackground. Our study aimed to review the role of deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option for defects in the head and neck region in the microvascular era. Methods. All patients who received DP flap reconstruction surgery at the Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, between 1999 and 2011 were recruited. Demographic data, indications for surgery, defect for reconstruction, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results. Fifty-four patients were included. All but two patients were operated for reconstruction after tumour resection. The remaining two patients were operated for necrotizing fasciitis and osteoradionecrosis. The majority of DP flaps were used to cover neck skin defect (63.0%). Other reconstructed defects included posterior pharyngeal wall (22.2%), facial skin defect (11.1%), and tracheal wall (3.7%). All donor sites were covered with partial thickness skin graft. Two patients developed partial flap necrosis at the tip and were managed conservatively. The overall flap survival rate was 96.3%. Conclusions. Albeit the technical advancements in microvascular surgery, DP still possesses multiple advantages (technical simplicity, reliable axial blood supply, large size, thinness, and pliability) which allows it to remain as a useful, reliable, and versatile surgical option for head and neck reconstruction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/420892
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. C. L. Chan
J. Y. W. Chan
spellingShingle R. C. L. Chan
J. Y. W. Chan
Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
Surgery Research and Practice
author_facet R. C. L. Chan
J. Y. W. Chan
author_sort R. C. L. Chan
title Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
title_short Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
title_full Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
title_fullStr Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
title_full_unstemmed Deltopectoral Flap in the Era of Microsurgery
title_sort deltopectoral flap in the era of microsurgery
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Surgery Research and Practice
issn 2356-7759
2356-6124
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background. Our study aimed to review the role of deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option for defects in the head and neck region in the microvascular era. Methods. All patients who received DP flap reconstruction surgery at the Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, between 1999 and 2011 were recruited. Demographic data, indications for surgery, defect for reconstruction, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results. Fifty-four patients were included. All but two patients were operated for reconstruction after tumour resection. The remaining two patients were operated for necrotizing fasciitis and osteoradionecrosis. The majority of DP flaps were used to cover neck skin defect (63.0%). Other reconstructed defects included posterior pharyngeal wall (22.2%), facial skin defect (11.1%), and tracheal wall (3.7%). All donor sites were covered with partial thickness skin graft. Two patients developed partial flap necrosis at the tip and were managed conservatively. The overall flap survival rate was 96.3%. Conclusions. Albeit the technical advancements in microvascular surgery, DP still possesses multiple advantages (technical simplicity, reliable axial blood supply, large size, thinness, and pliability) which allows it to remain as a useful, reliable, and versatile surgical option for head and neck reconstruction.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/420892
work_keys_str_mv AT rclchan deltopectoralflapintheeraofmicrosurgery
AT jywchan deltopectoralflapintheeraofmicrosurgery
_version_ 1725724745899442176