Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice
Aim and Context: This paper explores the current growth of service navigators in complex health and human services and details the development of the Service Navigation Relational Autonomy Framework as a guide to assist practitioners and managers implementing this role. Approach: The framework...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
ACHSM
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/11 |
id |
doaj-f3b1fff1c6b54d4a8fdfb52f9f91fe1f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f3b1fff1c6b54d4a8fdfb52f9f91fe1f2021-03-09T17:35:06ZengACHSM Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management1833-38182204-31362018-10-0113210.24083/apjhm.v13i2.119Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practiceJennifer Donovan0Ralph Hampson1Marie Connolly2University of MelbourneUniversity of MelbourneUniversity of Melbourne Aim and Context: This paper explores the current growth of service navigators in complex health and human services and details the development of the Service Navigation Relational Autonomy Framework as a guide to assist practitioners and managers implementing this role. Approach: The framework was developed using a research into action process. The three-stage process included knowledge inquiry: bringing together existing knowledge in practice fields and research; knowledge synthesis:debate and exchange of practitioner insights and messages from research; and knowledge framework: framework creation based on the key elements of evidence-informed best practice. Main findings: The framework centres on four practice domains: reinforcing ethical practices; fostering self-determination; supporting transitions and wellbeing; and mobilising service systems. It incorporates the concept of relational autonomy as a foundation for navigator practice by recognising the nature of relationships and power dynamics in the provision of care, and the central importance of self-determination. Conclusions: A navigation framework is critical for practice guidance and to ensure service navigators and organisations have the capacity to meet the needs of service users and their families. The framework presented in this paper seeks to encourage debate about service navigation, its implementation, and its future in health and human service organisations. https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/11Navigation, Service navigator, Personalisation, Relational autonomy, Framework, Self-determination, Advocacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jennifer Donovan Ralph Hampson Marie Connolly |
spellingShingle |
Jennifer Donovan Ralph Hampson Marie Connolly Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management Navigation, Service navigator, Personalisation, Relational autonomy, Framework, Self-determination, Advocacy |
author_facet |
Jennifer Donovan Ralph Hampson Marie Connolly |
author_sort |
Jennifer Donovan |
title |
Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
title_short |
Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
title_full |
Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
title_fullStr |
Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Service Navigators in the Workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
title_sort |
service navigators in the workforce: an ethical framework for practice |
publisher |
ACHSM |
series |
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management |
issn |
1833-3818 2204-3136 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Aim and Context: This paper explores the current growth of service navigators in complex health and human services and details the development of the Service Navigation Relational Autonomy Framework as a guide to assist practitioners and managers implementing this role.
Approach: The framework was developed using a research into action process. The three-stage process included knowledge inquiry: bringing together existing knowledge in practice fields and research; knowledge synthesis:debate and exchange of practitioner insights and messages from research; and knowledge framework: framework creation based on the key elements of evidence-informed best practice.
Main findings: The framework centres on four practice domains: reinforcing ethical practices; fostering self-determination; supporting transitions and wellbeing; and mobilising service systems. It incorporates the concept of relational autonomy as a foundation for navigator practice by recognising the nature of relationships and power dynamics in the provision of care, and the central importance of self-determination.
Conclusions: A navigation framework is critical for practice guidance and to ensure service navigators and organisations have the capacity to meet the needs of service users and their families.
The framework presented in this paper seeks to encourage debate about service navigation, its implementation, and its future in health and human service organisations.
|
topic |
Navigation, Service navigator, Personalisation, Relational autonomy, Framework, Self-determination, Advocacy |
url |
https://journal.achsm.org.au/index.php/achsm/article/view/11 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferdonovan servicenavigatorsintheworkforceanethicalframeworkforpractice AT ralphhampson servicenavigatorsintheworkforceanethicalframeworkforpractice AT marieconnolly servicenavigatorsintheworkforceanethicalframeworkforpractice |
_version_ |
1724227535161524224 |