Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008

Constantin-Dan BordeianuEmergency Hospital Ploiesti, Prahova, RomaniaPurpose: To critically analyze the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification of glaucomas, in order to reveal its advantages and shortcomings.Methods: The paper tries to determine the extent to which this classification is cle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bordeianu CD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-01-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/critical-analysis-of-the-classification-of-glaucomas-issued-by-the-eur-a15610
id doaj-f3ae5837cb644f90b1ac2aa47542c114
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3ae5837cb644f90b1ac2aa47542c1142020-11-25T01:00:21ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832014-01-012014default27128215610Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008Bordeianu CD Constantin-Dan BordeianuEmergency Hospital Ploiesti, Prahova, RomaniaPurpose: To critically analyze the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification of glaucomas, in order to reveal its advantages and shortcomings.Methods: The paper tries to determine the extent to which this classification is clear (being based on a coherent and consistently followed set of criteria), is comprehensive (framing all forms of glaucoma), helps to understand the sickness (using a logical framing system), and facilitates therapeutic decision making (offering direct therapeutic suggestions).Results and conclusion: The paper shows that, compared with all the previous classifications, the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification is one step ahead (in the way of classifying the group of secondary angle-closure glaucomas), two steps behind (in rejecting two useful categories of congenital glaucoma), and similar in several respects: that it is based on criticizable fundamental and secondary criteria that cannot cover all forms of sickness gathered at a particular crossing; that it uses several equally weighted criteria for one single crossing (division); that it frames one clinical entity in several clinical categories; that it does not reflect reality in some aspects; and that it does not offer direct therapeutic suggestions: after framing a case in a scheme built on the basis of gonioscopic observation, it requires a second stage of pathogenic analysis, so that the ophthalmologist is able to decide the correct treatment only in the third stage. All these considerations justify the efforts to find a new classification that will be able to correct the abovementioned shortcomings.Keywords: glaucoma, classification of glaucomas, shortcomings of the 2008 EGS classificationhttp://www.dovepress.com/critical-analysis-of-the-classification-of-glaucomas-issued-by-the-eur-a15610
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bordeianu CD
spellingShingle Bordeianu CD
Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Bordeianu CD
author_sort Bordeianu CD
title Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
title_short Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
title_full Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
title_fullStr Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
title_full_unstemmed Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008
title_sort critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the european glaucoma society in 2008
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Constantin-Dan BordeianuEmergency Hospital Ploiesti, Prahova, RomaniaPurpose: To critically analyze the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification of glaucomas, in order to reveal its advantages and shortcomings.Methods: The paper tries to determine the extent to which this classification is clear (being based on a coherent and consistently followed set of criteria), is comprehensive (framing all forms of glaucoma), helps to understand the sickness (using a logical framing system), and facilitates therapeutic decision making (offering direct therapeutic suggestions).Results and conclusion: The paper shows that, compared with all the previous classifications, the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification is one step ahead (in the way of classifying the group of secondary angle-closure glaucomas), two steps behind (in rejecting two useful categories of congenital glaucoma), and similar in several respects: that it is based on criticizable fundamental and secondary criteria that cannot cover all forms of sickness gathered at a particular crossing; that it uses several equally weighted criteria for one single crossing (division); that it frames one clinical entity in several clinical categories; that it does not reflect reality in some aspects; and that it does not offer direct therapeutic suggestions: after framing a case in a scheme built on the basis of gonioscopic observation, it requires a second stage of pathogenic analysis, so that the ophthalmologist is able to decide the correct treatment only in the third stage. All these considerations justify the efforts to find a new classification that will be able to correct the abovementioned shortcomings.Keywords: glaucoma, classification of glaucomas, shortcomings of the 2008 EGS classification
url http://www.dovepress.com/critical-analysis-of-the-classification-of-glaucomas-issued-by-the-eur-a15610
work_keys_str_mv AT bordeianucd criticalanalysisoftheclassificationofglaucomasissuedbytheeuropeanglaucomasocietyin2008
_version_ 1725213984790937600