A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery

Susan L Cusack,1 Harold S Minkowitz,2 Michael Kuss,3 Mark Jaros,4 Lisa Hemsen51Cusack Pharmaceutical Consulting, Burlington, NJ, 2Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Premier Research Group, Austin, TX, USA; 4Summit Analytical, Denver, CO, USA; 5Innocoll Technologies, At...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cusack SL, Minkowitz HS, Kuss M, Jaros M, Hemsen L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2012-11-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/a-randomized-multicenter-pilot-study-comparing-the-efficacy-and-safety-a11418
id doaj-f3a1ef090ce941d4b1624178f496936b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f3a1ef090ce941d4b1624178f496936b2020-11-24T20:44:52ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902012-11-012012default453461A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgeryCusack SLMinkowitz HSKuss MJaros MHemsen LSusan L Cusack,1 Harold S Minkowitz,2 Michael Kuss,3 Mark Jaros,4 Lisa Hemsen51Cusack Pharmaceutical Consulting, Burlington, NJ, 2Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Premier Research Group, Austin, TX, USA; 4Summit Analytical, Denver, CO, USA; 5Innocoll Technologies, Athlone, IrelandBackground: XaraColl®, a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion of bupivacaine to the wound environment via the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System (ON-Q).Methods: We randomized 27 women undergoing open gynecological surgery to receive either three XaraColl implants (each containing 50 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) or ON-Q (900 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride perfused over 72 hours) in a 1:1 ratio. Following surgery, patients had access to intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump as rescue analgesia for the first 24 hours and to oral opioid medication thereafter. Total use of opioid analgesia was compared through 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. Patients also evaluated overall pain control over the 96-hour period using a five-point numeric rating scale. Safety was assessed for 30 days after surgery.Results: XaraColl was non-inferior to ON-Q in total use of opioid analgesia for the first 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery, with a statistical trend towards reduced opioid use in favor of XaraColl over 24, 48, and 72 hours (P = 0.067, 0.100, and 0.089, respectively). The time to first use of opioid analgesia was also significantly delayed in patients treated with XaraColl (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between groups in patients’ evaluation of pain control or their satisfaction with the treatment in general. Both treatments were considered safe and well tolerated.Conclusion: Despite using only 17% of the ON-Q dose, XaraColl is as effective as ON-Q in providing postoperative analgesia for 4 days after open gynecological surgery. These preliminary findings suggest that XaraColl offers great potential for the management of postoperative pain and warrants further definitive studies.Keywords: pain, hysterectomy, opioid use, analgesia, anesthetichttp://www.dovepress.com/a-randomized-multicenter-pilot-study-comparing-the-efficacy-and-safety-a11418
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cusack SL
Minkowitz HS
Kuss M
Jaros M
Hemsen L
spellingShingle Cusack SL
Minkowitz HS
Kuss M
Jaros M
Hemsen L
A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
Journal of Pain Research
author_facet Cusack SL
Minkowitz HS
Kuss M
Jaros M
Hemsen L
author_sort Cusack SL
title A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_short A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_full A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_fullStr A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl®) with the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_sort randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (xaracoll®) with the on-q painbuster® post-op pain relief system following open gynecological surgery
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Pain Research
issn 1178-7090
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Susan L Cusack,1 Harold S Minkowitz,2 Michael Kuss,3 Mark Jaros,4 Lisa Hemsen51Cusack Pharmaceutical Consulting, Burlington, NJ, 2Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Premier Research Group, Austin, TX, USA; 4Summit Analytical, Denver, CO, USA; 5Innocoll Technologies, Athlone, IrelandBackground: XaraColl®, a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion of bupivacaine to the wound environment via the ON-Q PainBuster® Post-op Pain Relief System (ON-Q).Methods: We randomized 27 women undergoing open gynecological surgery to receive either three XaraColl implants (each containing 50 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) or ON-Q (900 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride perfused over 72 hours) in a 1:1 ratio. Following surgery, patients had access to intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump as rescue analgesia for the first 24 hours and to oral opioid medication thereafter. Total use of opioid analgesia was compared through 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. Patients also evaluated overall pain control over the 96-hour period using a five-point numeric rating scale. Safety was assessed for 30 days after surgery.Results: XaraColl was non-inferior to ON-Q in total use of opioid analgesia for the first 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery, with a statistical trend towards reduced opioid use in favor of XaraColl over 24, 48, and 72 hours (P = 0.067, 0.100, and 0.089, respectively). The time to first use of opioid analgesia was also significantly delayed in patients treated with XaraColl (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between groups in patients’ evaluation of pain control or their satisfaction with the treatment in general. Both treatments were considered safe and well tolerated.Conclusion: Despite using only 17% of the ON-Q dose, XaraColl is as effective as ON-Q in providing postoperative analgesia for 4 days after open gynecological surgery. These preliminary findings suggest that XaraColl offers great potential for the management of postoperative pain and warrants further definitive studies.Keywords: pain, hysterectomy, opioid use, analgesia, anesthetic
url http://www.dovepress.com/a-randomized-multicenter-pilot-study-comparing-the-efficacy-and-safety-a11418
work_keys_str_mv AT cusacksl arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT minkowitzhs arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT kussm arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT jarosm arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT hemsenl arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT cusacksl randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT minkowitzhs randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT kussm randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT jarosm randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT hemsenl randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollampregwiththeonqpainbusterampregpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
_version_ 1716816326569230336