Thematicity in applied linguistics textbooks: A comparative study of foreword, introduction and preface
While identifying the generic structure of academic introductions has been the focus of extensive research over the last few decades, investigating some, if not all, of the available linguistic resources that realize the identified generic structures seems to have been largely under-focused. In or...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Urmia University
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.urmia.ac.ir/sites/www.urmia.ac.ir/files/2.%20Jalilifar.pdf |
Summary: | While identifying the generic structure of academic introductions has been the focus of extensive
research over the last few decades, investigating some, if not all, of the available linguistic resources
that realize the identified generic structures seems to have been largely under-focused. In order to
shed light on the way that the communicative purposes performed by academic introductions depict
themselves in the linguistic choices exploited by language producers, the present study aimed to
investigate the thematic organizations that characterize three main variations within the introductory
sections of 60 academic textbooks (20 forewords, 20 introductions, 20 prefaces). Two analytical
models, namely Halliday’s (1994) categorization of theme and McCabe’s (1999) specification of
thematic progression patterns were incorporated. The qualitative and quantitative analyses of the
results indicated that the differences between the three introductory variations in thematic
configurations could be attributed to the nature and purposes fulfilled by the genre under
investigation. Thus, in order to achieve their intended goals, academic writers need to consider the
role played by different theme types as one of the available linguistic resources that help
communicate their purposes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2322-1291 2322-1291 |