Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse
This paper turns Post-Foucauldian discourse linguistics upside down to explore the situatedness of discourses as their material possibility condition. In order to do so I firstly clarify Foucault's notion of discourse oscillating between the poles of macro (knowledge order) and micro (material...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Bern Open Publishing
2014-09-01
|
Series: | Linguistik Online |
Online Access: | https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1601 |
id |
doaj-f360db89c6e84a2fa76834bb813d9f32 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f360db89c6e84a2fa76834bb813d9f322021-09-13T12:31:45ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142014-09-0167510.13092/lo.67.16011555Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von DiskurseMatthias MeilerThis paper turns Post-Foucauldian discourse linguistics upside down to explore the situatedness of discourses as their material possibility condition. In order to do so I firstly clarify Foucault's notion of discourse oscillating between the poles of macro (knowledge order) and micro (material event). In a second step recent media discourse analysis is discussed as an attempt to understand "la matérialité de l'énoncé" (Foucault 1969: 135) as a possibility condition of discourses. In a third step I propose an approach that conceptualizes the possibility conditions of communicational acting systematically between media technologies and communicative genres. The media linguistic notion of Forms of Communication (cf. Domke 2010a; Holly 2011a; Meiler 2013a) promisingly conceptualizes these conditions as enabling communication, hence discourse in situ. Following this, in a fourth step three generic examples are analyzed from the related position of semiological pragmatics (cf. Jäger 2008; Rehbein 2001). By these three examples (taken from a corpus of communication in public space) the paper demonstrates how different Forms of Communication shape specific possibilities to communicate different types of discursive knowledge (and vice versa): verified, temporarily relevant, and contested knowledge. It is also worked out in which way the production conditions of each Form of Communication determine how accessible a discourse is. In this respect, public space and mass media appear to be remarkably opposed to one another.https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1601 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthias Meiler |
spellingShingle |
Matthias Meiler Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse Linguistik Online |
author_facet |
Matthias Meiler |
author_sort |
Matthias Meiler |
title |
Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse |
title_short |
Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse |
title_full |
Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse |
title_fullStr |
Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diskurse – Medien – Dispositive oder Die Situationen des Diskurses. Anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen Diskussion um die Medialität von Diskurse |
title_sort |
diskurse – medien – dispositive oder die situationen des diskurses. anmerkungen zur postfoucaultschen diskussion um die medialität von diskurse |
publisher |
Bern Open Publishing |
series |
Linguistik Online |
issn |
1615-3014 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
This paper turns Post-Foucauldian discourse linguistics upside down to explore the situatedness of discourses as their material possibility condition. In order to do so I firstly clarify Foucault's notion of discourse oscillating between the poles of macro (knowledge order) and micro (material event). In a second step recent media discourse analysis is discussed as an attempt to understand "la matérialité de l'énoncé" (Foucault 1969: 135) as a possibility condition of discourses. In a third step I propose an approach that conceptualizes the possibility conditions of communicational acting systematically between media technologies and communicative genres. The media linguistic notion of Forms of Communication (cf. Domke 2010a; Holly 2011a; Meiler 2013a) promisingly conceptualizes these conditions as enabling communication, hence discourse in situ. Following this, in a fourth step three generic examples are analyzed from the related position of semiological pragmatics (cf. Jäger 2008; Rehbein 2001). By these three examples (taken from a corpus of communication in public space) the paper demonstrates how different Forms of Communication shape specific possibilities to communicate different types of discursive knowledge (and vice versa): verified, temporarily relevant, and contested knowledge. It is also worked out in which way the production conditions of each Form of Communication determine how accessible a discourse is. In this respect, public space and mass media appear to be remarkably opposed to one another. |
url |
https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1601 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthiasmeiler diskursemediendispositiveoderdiesituationendesdiskursesanmerkungenzurpostfoucaultschendiskussionumdiemedialitatvondiskurse |
_version_ |
1717380827152646144 |