Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?

While there has been a broad debate on the use of theory in history in general, there are few contributions by historians of communication and the media discussing the role of theory in their particular field. We therefore review and discuss some of the main arguments pertaining to the use of theory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Krämer, Philipp Müller
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2016-11-01
Series:Studies in Communication, Media
Online Access:https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-3-307
id doaj-f356be6b90f7418a9bf4b72060b8a200
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f356be6b90f7418a9bf4b72060b8a2002020-11-25T00:29:08ZdeuNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KGStudies in Communication, Media2192-40072016-11-015330733310.5771/2192-4007-2016-3-3071057712192400720163307Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?Benjamin KrämerPhilipp MüllerWhile there has been a broad debate on the use of theory in history in general, there are few contributions by historians of communication and the media discussing the role of theory in their particular field. We therefore review and discuss some of the main arguments pertaining to the use of theory in historiography and apply them to the field of media and communication history. Such arguments include the assumption that theories are already implicit in all types of narratives, or the idea that theory amounts to a speculative philosophy of history. We also discuss the controversial question whether deductive explanations and general laws should be applied to history. The article concludes that the use of theories is advisable, perhaps even necessary, given their multifunctionality and their different forms.https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-3-307
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Krämer
Philipp Müller
spellingShingle Benjamin Krämer
Philipp Müller
Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
Studies in Communication, Media
author_facet Benjamin Krämer
Philipp Müller
author_sort Benjamin Krämer
title Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
title_short Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
title_full Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
title_fullStr Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
title_full_unstemmed Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
title_sort is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)?
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
series Studies in Communication, Media
issn 2192-4007
publishDate 2016-11-01
description While there has been a broad debate on the use of theory in history in general, there are few contributions by historians of communication and the media discussing the role of theory in their particular field. We therefore review and discuss some of the main arguments pertaining to the use of theory in historiography and apply them to the field of media and communication history. Such arguments include the assumption that theories are already implicit in all types of narratives, or the idea that theory amounts to a speculative philosophy of history. We also discuss the controversial question whether deductive explanations and general laws should be applied to history. The article concludes that the use of theories is advisable, perhaps even necessary, given their multifunctionality and their different forms.
url https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-3-307
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminkramer isatheoryofmediaandcommunicationhistorypossibleandnecessary
AT philippmuller isatheoryofmediaandcommunicationhistorypossibleandnecessary
_version_ 1725333130521346048