Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial.
Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the Internationa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5728514?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-f329b7629c3c424cb6b3f2c1002f6adb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f329b7629c3c424cb6b3f2c1002f6adb2020-11-25T02:29:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011212e018914810.1371/journal.pone.0189148Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial.Maren RederPetra KolipDecision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration.To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation.A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme's invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ2-tests.1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention.This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public.German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5728514?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maren Reder Petra Kolip |
spellingShingle |
Maren Reder Petra Kolip Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Maren Reder Petra Kolip |
author_sort |
Maren Reder |
title |
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. |
title_short |
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. |
title_full |
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. |
title_fullStr |
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial. |
title_sort |
does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? results from a randomised controlled trial. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Decision aids can support informed choice in mammography screening, but for the German mammography screening programme no systematically evaluated decision aid exists to date. We developed a decision aid for women invited to this programme for the first time based on the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration.To determine whether a decision aid increases informed choice about mammography screening programme participation.A representative sample of 7,400 women aged 50 was drawn from registration offices in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. Women were randomised to receive usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme's invitation letter) or the decision aid. Data were collected online at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome was informed choice. Secondary outcomes were the constituents of informed choice (knowledge, attitude, intention/uptake), decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision stage. Outcomes were analysed using latent structural equation models and χ2-tests.1,206 women participated (response rate of 16.3%). The decision aid increased informed choice. Women in the control group had lower odds to make an informed choice at post-intervention (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.37) and at follow-up (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94); informed choices remained constant at 30%. This was also reflected in lower knowledge and more decisional conflict. Post-intervention, the uptake intention was higher in the control group, whereas the uptake rate at follow-up was similar. Women in the control group had a more positive attitude at follow-up than women receiving the decision aid. Decision regret and decision stage were not influenced by the intervention.This paper describes the first systematic evaluation of a newly developed decision aid for the German mammography screening programme in a randomised controlled trial. Our decision aid proved to be an effective tool to enhance the rate of informed choice and was made accessible to the public.German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5728514?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marenreder doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT petrakolip doesadecisionaidimproveinformedchoiceinmammographyscreeningresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1724834616332779520 |