The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA

Objectives: This study evaluated stress distrubitions formed by oblique forces in dental hard tissues, base materials and restorations of endodontically treated permanent mandibular first molars that were restored with different base materials and direct composite restorations by using 3D-FEA method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derya Merve Halaçoğlu, Kıvanç Yamanel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cumhuriyet University 2019-03-01
Series:Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.org.tr/cumudj/issue/43851/453467?publisher=cumhuriyet
id doaj-f31fa3bab9184942a15a8e4b271b42d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f31fa3bab9184942a15a8e4b271b42d42020-11-24T22:09:20ZengCumhuriyet UniversityCumhuriyet Dental Journal1302-58052146-28522019-03-01221566510.7126/cumudj.4534672The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEADerya Merve Halaçoğlu0Kıvanç Yamanel1YEDITEPE UNIVERSITYBASKENT UNIVERSITYObjectives: This study evaluated stress distrubitions formed by oblique forces in dental hard tissues, base materials and restorations of endodontically treated permanent mandibular first molars that were restored with different base materials and direct composite restorations by using 3D-FEA method.Materials and Methods: For two different restorative approaches; an MO cavity design and a MOD cavity design was created. Then root canal obturation was modeled. Composite resin (CR), conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), fiber reinforced composite resin (FRCR), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), flowable composite (FC), and bulk-fill composite resin (BF) were used as base materials. Von Mises, compressive and tensile stresses in enamel, dentin, base materials and final restoration were analyzed using finite element stress analysis method.Results: Regarding the resulting stresses, CR caused highest stresses and RMGIC caused lowest stresses in enamel, base material, and final restoration. RMGIC caused highest stresses and CR caused lowest stresses in dentin. It was noted that MOD cavity design caused more stress than MO cavity design for all analyzed materials.Conclusions: Materials with elastic moduli similar to dentin; FRCR and GIC, may be better choice to avoid high stresses within the tooth and restoration.http://dergipark.org.tr/cumudj/issue/43851/453467?publisher=cumhuriyetglass ionomer cementfinite element analysiscomposite resins
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Derya Merve Halaçoğlu
Kıvanç Yamanel
spellingShingle Derya Merve Halaçoğlu
Kıvanç Yamanel
The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
glass ionomer cement
finite element analysis
composite resins
author_facet Derya Merve Halaçoğlu
Kıvanç Yamanel
author_sort Derya Merve Halaçoğlu
title The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
title_short The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
title_full The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Base Materials on the Stress Distribution of the Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3D FEA
title_sort effects of different base materials on the stress distribution of the endodontically treated teeth: 3d fea
publisher Cumhuriyet University
series Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
issn 1302-5805
2146-2852
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Objectives: This study evaluated stress distrubitions formed by oblique forces in dental hard tissues, base materials and restorations of endodontically treated permanent mandibular first molars that were restored with different base materials and direct composite restorations by using 3D-FEA method.Materials and Methods: For two different restorative approaches; an MO cavity design and a MOD cavity design was created. Then root canal obturation was modeled. Composite resin (CR), conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), fiber reinforced composite resin (FRCR), resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), flowable composite (FC), and bulk-fill composite resin (BF) were used as base materials. Von Mises, compressive and tensile stresses in enamel, dentin, base materials and final restoration were analyzed using finite element stress analysis method.Results: Regarding the resulting stresses, CR caused highest stresses and RMGIC caused lowest stresses in enamel, base material, and final restoration. RMGIC caused highest stresses and CR caused lowest stresses in dentin. It was noted that MOD cavity design caused more stress than MO cavity design for all analyzed materials.Conclusions: Materials with elastic moduli similar to dentin; FRCR and GIC, may be better choice to avoid high stresses within the tooth and restoration.
topic glass ionomer cement
finite element analysis
composite resins
url http://dergipark.org.tr/cumudj/issue/43851/453467?publisher=cumhuriyet
work_keys_str_mv AT deryamervehalacoglu theeffectsofdifferentbasematerialsonthestressdistributionoftheendodonticallytreatedteeth3dfea
AT kıvancyamanel theeffectsofdifferentbasematerialsonthestressdistributionoftheendodonticallytreatedteeth3dfea
AT deryamervehalacoglu effectsofdifferentbasematerialsonthestressdistributionoftheendodonticallytreatedteeth3dfea
AT kıvancyamanel effectsofdifferentbasematerialsonthestressdistributionoftheendodonticallytreatedteeth3dfea
_version_ 1725812377903955968