Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis

Tessa Hanley, Marc Handford, Dawn Lavery, Zenas ZN Yiu Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKBackground: Current treatment guidelines for biologic therapies in psoriasis differ in their recommendation for the monitoring of adverse events.Objective: The aim of this pap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanley T, Handford M, Lavery D, Yiu ZZN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-04-01
Series:Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/assessment-and-monitoring-of-biologic-drug-adverse-events-in-patients--peer-reviewed-article-PTT
id doaj-f31746f798074739988f79dc90dc4482
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f31746f798074739988f79dc90dc44822020-11-25T01:36:19ZengDove Medical PressPsoriasis : Targets and Therapy2230-326X2016-04-012016Issue 1415426254Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasisHanley THandford MLavery DYiu ZZNTessa Hanley, Marc Handford, Dawn Lavery, Zenas ZN Yiu Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKBackground: Current treatment guidelines for biologic therapies in psoriasis differ in their recommendation for the monitoring of adverse events.Objective: The aim of this paper was to draw together evidence from the currently available guidelines as a summary of how biologics licensed for the treatment of psoriasis should be monitored for adverse events.Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched to identity the current literature on the safety and screening guidance associated with infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.Limitations: This study was limited by the lack of data evaluating monitoring in patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with a biologic therapy.Results: This review of the current literature highlights that there are areas of routine screening, which are recommended in current practice, which require further evidence to investigate its true utility.Conclusion: Most screening and monitoring tests performed routinely in clinical practice are supported by minimal clinical evidence, highlighting the need for more studies to evaluate the role and value of the different modalities of screening and monitoring for adverse events in those with psoriasis receiving treatment with biologic therapies. Keywords: biologics, monitoring, psoriasis, screening, safetyhttps://www.dovepress.com/assessment-and-monitoring-of-biologic-drug-adverse-events-in-patients--peer-reviewed-article-PTTBiologicsmonitoringpsoriasisscreeningsafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanley T
Handford M
Lavery D
Yiu ZZN
spellingShingle Hanley T
Handford M
Lavery D
Yiu ZZN
Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy
Biologics
monitoring
psoriasis
screening
safety
author_facet Hanley T
Handford M
Lavery D
Yiu ZZN
author_sort Hanley T
title Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
title_short Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
title_full Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
title_fullStr Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
title_sort assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Psoriasis : Targets and Therapy
issn 2230-326X
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Tessa Hanley, Marc Handford, Dawn Lavery, Zenas ZN Yiu Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKBackground: Current treatment guidelines for biologic therapies in psoriasis differ in their recommendation for the monitoring of adverse events.Objective: The aim of this paper was to draw together evidence from the currently available guidelines as a summary of how biologics licensed for the treatment of psoriasis should be monitored for adverse events.Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched to identity the current literature on the safety and screening guidance associated with infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.Limitations: This study was limited by the lack of data evaluating monitoring in patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with a biologic therapy.Results: This review of the current literature highlights that there are areas of routine screening, which are recommended in current practice, which require further evidence to investigate its true utility.Conclusion: Most screening and monitoring tests performed routinely in clinical practice are supported by minimal clinical evidence, highlighting the need for more studies to evaluate the role and value of the different modalities of screening and monitoring for adverse events in those with psoriasis receiving treatment with biologic therapies. Keywords: biologics, monitoring, psoriasis, screening, safety
topic Biologics
monitoring
psoriasis
screening
safety
url https://www.dovepress.com/assessment-and-monitoring-of-biologic-drug-adverse-events-in-patients--peer-reviewed-article-PTT
work_keys_str_mv AT hanleyt assessmentandmonitoringofbiologicdrugadverseeventsinpatientswithpsoriasis
AT handfordm assessmentandmonitoringofbiologicdrugadverseeventsinpatientswithpsoriasis
AT laveryd assessmentandmonitoringofbiologicdrugadverseeventsinpatientswithpsoriasis
AT yiuzzn assessmentandmonitoringofbiologicdrugadverseeventsinpatientswithpsoriasis
_version_ 1725063761938612224