Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty

Abstract Background The use of shorter length femoral stems during total hip arthroplasty has been suggested to accommodate wider patient femoral geometry and offer maximal bone preservation. However, cemented short-stem designs may increase the risk of varus stem malalignment and influence patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David F. Hamilton, Nicholas E. Ohly, Paul Gaston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2621-8
id doaj-f315c469191141f7816588a538e0831b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f315c469191141f7816588a538e0831b2020-11-24T21:45:43ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-04-011911610.1186/s13063-018-2621-8Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplastyDavid F. Hamilton0Nicholas E. Ohly1Paul Gaston2Department of Orthopaedics, University of EdinburghDepartment of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of EdinburghAbstract Background The use of shorter length femoral stems during total hip arthroplasty has been suggested to accommodate wider patient femoral geometry and offer maximal bone preservation. However, cemented short-stem designs may increase the risk of varus stem malalignment and influence patient outcomes. Methods/Design CASINO is a multi-centre randomised equivalence trial that will recruit 220 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis at two NHS hospitals in Scotland. Patients will be aged 45–80, undergoing unilateral primary hip arthroplasty, with no plan for contralateral procedure within the study timeframe, and able to comply with the protocol. Participants will be randomised to receive either a short (125 mm) or a standard (150 mm) Exeter V40 stem. The Contemporary acetabular component will be used in all cases. All implants will be cemented. Patient pain, function and satisfaction will be assessed using change from baseline measurement in Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ-5D, pain numerical rating scores, and patient satisfaction questionnaire at baseline and at 1 and 2 years following surgery. Radiographic assessment will evaluate stem position and will be appraised by independent reviewers. Patients will be blind to implant allocation. Discussion Stem length may be associated with outcome; however, we can find no randomised trial in which researchers investigated the effect of stem length on patient outcome following cemented total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this trial is to determine if the use of short cemented stems offers equivalent patient outcomes to those achieved following surgery with standard length stems. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN13154542, Registered on 30 June 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2621-8Total hip arthroplastyOutcomesFunction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David F. Hamilton
Nicholas E. Ohly
Paul Gaston
spellingShingle David F. Hamilton
Nicholas E. Ohly
Paul Gaston
Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
Trials
Total hip arthroplasty
Outcomes
Function
author_facet David F. Hamilton
Nicholas E. Ohly
Paul Gaston
author_sort David F. Hamilton
title Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
title_short Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
title_full Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
title_sort can arthroplasty stem influence outcome? (casino): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm exeter v40 stems in total hip arthroplasty
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background The use of shorter length femoral stems during total hip arthroplasty has been suggested to accommodate wider patient femoral geometry and offer maximal bone preservation. However, cemented short-stem designs may increase the risk of varus stem malalignment and influence patient outcomes. Methods/Design CASINO is a multi-centre randomised equivalence trial that will recruit 220 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis at two NHS hospitals in Scotland. Patients will be aged 45–80, undergoing unilateral primary hip arthroplasty, with no plan for contralateral procedure within the study timeframe, and able to comply with the protocol. Participants will be randomised to receive either a short (125 mm) or a standard (150 mm) Exeter V40 stem. The Contemporary acetabular component will be used in all cases. All implants will be cemented. Patient pain, function and satisfaction will be assessed using change from baseline measurement in Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ-5D, pain numerical rating scores, and patient satisfaction questionnaire at baseline and at 1 and 2 years following surgery. Radiographic assessment will evaluate stem position and will be appraised by independent reviewers. Patients will be blind to implant allocation. Discussion Stem length may be associated with outcome; however, we can find no randomised trial in which researchers investigated the effect of stem length on patient outcome following cemented total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this trial is to determine if the use of short cemented stems offers equivalent patient outcomes to those achieved following surgery with standard length stems. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN13154542, Registered on 30 June 2017.
topic Total hip arthroplasty
Outcomes
Function
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2621-8
work_keys_str_mv AT davidfhamilton canarthroplastysteminfluenceoutcomecasinoarandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialof125mmversus150mmexeterv40stemsintotalhiparthroplasty
AT nicholaseohly canarthroplastysteminfluenceoutcomecasinoarandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialof125mmversus150mmexeterv40stemsintotalhiparthroplasty
AT paulgaston canarthroplastysteminfluenceoutcomecasinoarandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrialof125mmversus150mmexeterv40stemsintotalhiparthroplasty
_version_ 1725904672693157888