Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement

Background: This in vitro study was carried out to investigate the effect of post space regions (coronal, middle and apical), the effect of post types ( Manually Milled Zirconia post, Prefabricated Fiber post, prefabricated Zirconia post) and the type of cement used (GIC, self-adhesive resin cem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed A Al-Jumaily, Haitham J Al-Azzawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad 2014-03-01
Series:Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
Online Access:https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/289
id doaj-f31104b13ac944cca598300df4c01e4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f31104b13ac944cca598300df4c01e4c2021-09-02T19:49:10ZengCollege of Dentistry/ University of BaghdadJournal of Baghdad College of Dentistry2311-52702014-03-01261Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cementAhmed A Al-JumailyHaitham J Al-AzzawiBackground: This in vitro study was carried out to investigate the effect of post space regions (coronal, middle and apical), the effect of post types ( Manually Milled Zirconia post, Prefabricated Fiber post, prefabricated Zirconia post) and the type of cement used (GIC, self-adhesive resin cement) on the bond strength between the posts and root dentin by using push-out test. Material and methods: Forty eight mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons (single rooted) were instrumented with ProTaper system (hand use) and obturated with gutta percha for ProTaper using AH26 root canal sealer following the manufacturer instructions. After 24 hours, post space was prepared using Zirix and Glassix drills no.3 creating 8 mm depth post space. The prepared samples were randomly divided into three main groups (16 samples each) according to the type of post used (Group A. Manually Milled Zirconia post, Group B. Prefabricated Fiber post and Group C. Prefabricated Zirconia post) .each group was subdivided into two subgroups (each subgroup contains 8 samples) according to the type of cement used (subgroup A1.Manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with GIC, subgroup A2.Manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with Speed cem),( subgroup B1.Prefabricated Fiber post cemented with GIC, Group B2. Prefabricated Fiber post cemented with Speed cem) and (subgroup C1.Prefabricated Zirconia post cemented with GIC, subgroup C2. Prefabricated Zirconia post cemented with Speed cem), after cementation and incubation for 24hrs, at 37c and 100% humidity. Each root was sectioned horizontally into 3 slices (2 mm in thickness) representing the coronal, middle and apical regions of the post space. Push out bond strength test was performed and measured using a universal testing machine (Tinius-Olsen) at across head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results: The results showed that regarding the root region, the bond strength values increased significantly from apical to coronal region for all types of posts in both tested cements. For the effect of post type, the manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with the self-cured resin cement (Speed cem) showed higher bond strength values. For type of cement, the self-adhesive resin cement (Speed cem) showed higher bond strength values. Conclusions: the retention of post restoration was affected by root region, type of post and type of cement used. https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/289
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed A Al-Jumaily
Haitham J Al-Azzawi
spellingShingle Ahmed A Al-Jumaily
Haitham J Al-Azzawi
Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
author_facet Ahmed A Al-Jumaily
Haitham J Al-Azzawi
author_sort Ahmed A Al-Jumaily
title Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
title_short Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
title_full Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
title_fullStr Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
title_sort comparison of regional bond strength among different types of posts luted with different types of cement
publisher College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad
series Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
issn 2311-5270
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Background: This in vitro study was carried out to investigate the effect of post space regions (coronal, middle and apical), the effect of post types ( Manually Milled Zirconia post, Prefabricated Fiber post, prefabricated Zirconia post) and the type of cement used (GIC, self-adhesive resin cement) on the bond strength between the posts and root dentin by using push-out test. Material and methods: Forty eight mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons (single rooted) were instrumented with ProTaper system (hand use) and obturated with gutta percha for ProTaper using AH26 root canal sealer following the manufacturer instructions. After 24 hours, post space was prepared using Zirix and Glassix drills no.3 creating 8 mm depth post space. The prepared samples were randomly divided into three main groups (16 samples each) according to the type of post used (Group A. Manually Milled Zirconia post, Group B. Prefabricated Fiber post and Group C. Prefabricated Zirconia post) .each group was subdivided into two subgroups (each subgroup contains 8 samples) according to the type of cement used (subgroup A1.Manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with GIC, subgroup A2.Manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with Speed cem),( subgroup B1.Prefabricated Fiber post cemented with GIC, Group B2. Prefabricated Fiber post cemented with Speed cem) and (subgroup C1.Prefabricated Zirconia post cemented with GIC, subgroup C2. Prefabricated Zirconia post cemented with Speed cem), after cementation and incubation for 24hrs, at 37c and 100% humidity. Each root was sectioned horizontally into 3 slices (2 mm in thickness) representing the coronal, middle and apical regions of the post space. Push out bond strength test was performed and measured using a universal testing machine (Tinius-Olsen) at across head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results: The results showed that regarding the root region, the bond strength values increased significantly from apical to coronal region for all types of posts in both tested cements. For the effect of post type, the manually Milled Zirconia post cemented with the self-cured resin cement (Speed cem) showed higher bond strength values. For type of cement, the self-adhesive resin cement (Speed cem) showed higher bond strength values. Conclusions: the retention of post restoration was affected by root region, type of post and type of cement used.
url https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/289
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedaaljumaily comparisonofregionalbondstrengthamongdifferenttypesofpostslutedwithdifferenttypesofcement
AT haithamjalazzawi comparisonofregionalbondstrengthamongdifferenttypesofpostslutedwithdifferenttypesofcement
_version_ 1721170766357069824