Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation

This paper challenges the claim of globalisation as a cause ofimmigration into Southern Europe and, on an empirical basis, identifies regionalisation as being the primary issue, along with networked migratory patterns. However, the changing patterns of immigration do present challenges to both state...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Baldwin-Eduards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CEG 2004-01-01
Series:Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia
Online Access:https://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/1558
id doaj-f2ffa300c6e4486bb3c7cb1a183b23e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2ffa300c6e4486bb3c7cb1a183b23e62021-08-02T22:56:36ZengCEGFinisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia0430-50272182-29052004-01-01397710.18055/Finis1558Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus GlobalisationMartin Baldwin-EduardsThis paper challenges the claim of globalisation as a cause ofimmigration into Southern Europe and, on an empirical basis, identifies regionalisation as being the primary issue, along with networked migratory patterns. However, the changing patterns of immigration do present challenges to both state and society. It is argued here that recent policy responses in Portugal, Italy and Spain have been inconsistent and irrational – reflecting more the ‘securitisation’ of migration than European reality. Earlier policy innovations are identified, by country and date: most of these have now been abandoned. It is suggested that all of Southern Europe has converged onto a statist, restrictionist model of immigration control that was formerly held only by Greece. The principal characteristics of this model are outlined, along with a migration flowchart and indicative data for migrant flows and sub-flows in Italy and Spain. In the final section, I try to show that the needs of the economy cannot be predicted, immigration cannot becontrolled in the manner currently being enforced across Southern Europe, and attempts to do so will damage rather than improve economic productivity and growth. The concept of an accomodating immigration policy is advanced, whereby the state tries to manage the needs of both employers and potential migrants. Six guidelines for policy development are suggested – most of which have alreadybeen successfully carried out in the European Union. These are the following: migration in order to find a job; circular cross-border migration; EU level negotiation of readmission agreements; the need for a variety of migration-for-employment schemes; legal residence should not depend upon continuity of employment; and discreet legalisation will still be needed in Southern Europe.https://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/1558
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Baldwin-Eduards
spellingShingle Martin Baldwin-Eduards
Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia
author_facet Martin Baldwin-Eduards
author_sort Martin Baldwin-Eduards
title Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
title_short Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
title_full Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
title_fullStr Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
title_full_unstemmed Mediterranean Migrations: Regionalisms Versus Globalisation
title_sort mediterranean migrations: regionalisms versus globalisation
publisher CEG
series Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia
issn 0430-5027
2182-2905
publishDate 2004-01-01
description This paper challenges the claim of globalisation as a cause ofimmigration into Southern Europe and, on an empirical basis, identifies regionalisation as being the primary issue, along with networked migratory patterns. However, the changing patterns of immigration do present challenges to both state and society. It is argued here that recent policy responses in Portugal, Italy and Spain have been inconsistent and irrational – reflecting more the ‘securitisation’ of migration than European reality. Earlier policy innovations are identified, by country and date: most of these have now been abandoned. It is suggested that all of Southern Europe has converged onto a statist, restrictionist model of immigration control that was formerly held only by Greece. The principal characteristics of this model are outlined, along with a migration flowchart and indicative data for migrant flows and sub-flows in Italy and Spain. In the final section, I try to show that the needs of the economy cannot be predicted, immigration cannot becontrolled in the manner currently being enforced across Southern Europe, and attempts to do so will damage rather than improve economic productivity and growth. The concept of an accomodating immigration policy is advanced, whereby the state tries to manage the needs of both employers and potential migrants. Six guidelines for policy development are suggested – most of which have alreadybeen successfully carried out in the European Union. These are the following: migration in order to find a job; circular cross-border migration; EU level negotiation of readmission agreements; the need for a variety of migration-for-employment schemes; legal residence should not depend upon continuity of employment; and discreet legalisation will still be needed in Southern Europe.
url https://revistas.rcaap.pt/finisterra/article/view/1558
work_keys_str_mv AT martinbaldwineduards mediterraneanmigrationsregionalismsversusglobalisation
_version_ 1721226033567367168