A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace

In recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the biblio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinwei Su, Xi Li, Yanxin Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119
id doaj-f2f91f3d6aa04649b45b2991e2b2d0fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2f91f3d6aa04649b45b2991e2b2d0fe2020-11-25T03:39:23ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-04-01910.1177/2158244019840119A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpaceXinwei Su0Xi Li1Yanxin Kang2City University of Macau, ChinaCity University of Macau, ChinaLiming Vocational University, Quanzhou, ChinaIn recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the bibliometric analysis of all papers, and the results of the analysis of literature clustering, scientific research collaboration, co-citations, and so on were visually displayed. The results show that there is not substantial collaboration among researchers, research institutions, or countries that conduct research on ICH. The relationship between high-yield and high-citation authorship is inconsistent and weak. High-yield countries are mainly concentrated in a small group that includes China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The research has mainly focused on heritage protection, heritage space, heritage management, heritage policy, and the internationalization of heritage. In recent years, the focus of research has been on creative heritage tourism, community participation in heritage protection and development, and the authenticity of heritage.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xinwei Su
Xi Li
Yanxin Kang
spellingShingle Xinwei Su
Xi Li
Yanxin Kang
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
SAGE Open
author_facet Xinwei Su
Xi Li
Yanxin Kang
author_sort Xinwei Su
title A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
title_sort bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using citespace
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-04-01
description In recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the bibliometric analysis of all papers, and the results of the analysis of literature clustering, scientific research collaboration, co-citations, and so on were visually displayed. The results show that there is not substantial collaboration among researchers, research institutions, or countries that conduct research on ICH. The relationship between high-yield and high-citation authorship is inconsistent and weak. High-yield countries are mainly concentrated in a small group that includes China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The research has mainly focused on heritage protection, heritage space, heritage management, heritage policy, and the internationalization of heritage. In recent years, the focus of research has been on creative heritage tourism, community participation in heritage protection and development, and the authenticity of heritage.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119
work_keys_str_mv AT xinweisu abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
AT xili abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
AT yanxinkang abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
AT xinweisu bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
AT xili bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
AT yanxinkang bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace
_version_ 1724539096606441472