A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
In recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the biblio...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-04-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119 |
id |
doaj-f2f91f3d6aa04649b45b2991e2b2d0fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2f91f3d6aa04649b45b2991e2b2d0fe2020-11-25T03:39:23ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-04-01910.1177/2158244019840119A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpaceXinwei Su0Xi Li1Yanxin Kang2City University of Macau, ChinaCity University of Macau, ChinaLiming Vocational University, Quanzhou, ChinaIn recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the bibliometric analysis of all papers, and the results of the analysis of literature clustering, scientific research collaboration, co-citations, and so on were visually displayed. The results show that there is not substantial collaboration among researchers, research institutions, or countries that conduct research on ICH. The relationship between high-yield and high-citation authorship is inconsistent and weak. High-yield countries are mainly concentrated in a small group that includes China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The research has mainly focused on heritage protection, heritage space, heritage management, heritage policy, and the internationalization of heritage. In recent years, the focus of research has been on creative heritage tourism, community participation in heritage protection and development, and the authenticity of heritage.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xinwei Su Xi Li Yanxin Kang |
spellingShingle |
Xinwei Su Xi Li Yanxin Kang A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Xinwei Su Xi Li Yanxin Kang |
author_sort |
Xinwei Su |
title |
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace |
title_short |
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace |
title_full |
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace |
title_fullStr |
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace |
title_sort |
bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using citespace |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
In recent years, studies on intangible cultural heritage (ICH) have substantially increased as the subject has received extensive attention from scholars. This study collected all the papers (249) on ICH from the Web of Science (WoS) core database. CiteSpace analysis software was used for the bibliometric analysis of all papers, and the results of the analysis of literature clustering, scientific research collaboration, co-citations, and so on were visually displayed. The results show that there is not substantial collaboration among researchers, research institutions, or countries that conduct research on ICH. The relationship between high-yield and high-citation authorship is inconsistent and weak. High-yield countries are mainly concentrated in a small group that includes China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The research has mainly focused on heritage protection, heritage space, heritage management, heritage policy, and the internationalization of heritage. In recent years, the focus of research has been on creative heritage tourism, community participation in heritage protection and development, and the authenticity of heritage. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xinweisu abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace AT xili abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace AT yanxinkang abibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace AT xinweisu bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace AT xili bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace AT yanxinkang bibliometricanalysisofresearchonintangibleculturalheritageusingcitespace |
_version_ |
1724539096606441472 |