Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
Peoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural v...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692 |
id |
doaj-f2d9086b3ec84625b86022aa92ddc3e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2d9086b3ec84625b86022aa92ddc3e22020-11-25T02:12:31ZengPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN2312-91822312-92122019-12-0123192210.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-9-2217359Cultural bias and SociolinguisticsDick Smakman0Leiden University, Centre for LinguisticsPeoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural variation, which is visible in hierarchical social systems, belief systems, legal systems, traditions, attire, and all kinds of rituals. Communicative systems are part of culture, and they deserve a role in research focussing on language and communication. However, applying culture as a variable is a challenge, not only because of the cultural variation between peoples and individuals but also because the effects of culture on actual language utterances are hard to measure. Another issue is the dominance of Anglowestern cultural patterns in many analyses. This paper explains these issues and critically reviews the various criteria that well-known cultural models - like the one by Hofstede (1980), Lewis (1969), and Hall (1959, 1976) - use to categorise cultures. Examples of such criteria are: region, relationship with uncertainty, femininity/masculinity, and power relations. The paper concludes by giving a number of practical solutions to the challenge of treating culture as a variable in sociolinguistic research. These solutions are related to, amongst others, the reviewing process for journals, widespread norms of ‘good academic language’, author/editor selection, cross-cultural academic cooperation, and sharing of funds.http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692cultural modelssociolinguisticsAnglowestern biascultural criteriasolutions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dick Smakman |
spellingShingle |
Dick Smakman Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN cultural models sociolinguistics Anglowestern bias cultural criteria solutions |
author_facet |
Dick Smakman |
author_sort |
Dick Smakman |
title |
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics |
title_short |
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics |
title_full |
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics |
title_fullStr |
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics |
title_sort |
cultural bias and sociolinguistics |
publisher |
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
series |
Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN |
issn |
2312-9182 2312-9212 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Peoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural variation, which is visible in hierarchical social systems, belief systems, legal systems, traditions, attire, and all kinds of rituals. Communicative systems are part of culture, and they deserve a role in research focussing on language and communication. However, applying culture as a variable is a challenge, not only because of the cultural variation between peoples and individuals but also because the effects of culture on actual language utterances are hard to measure. Another issue is the dominance of Anglowestern cultural patterns in many analyses. This paper explains these issues and critically reviews the various criteria that well-known cultural models - like the one by Hofstede (1980), Lewis (1969), and Hall (1959, 1976) - use to categorise cultures. Examples of such criteria are: region, relationship with uncertainty, femininity/masculinity, and power relations. The paper concludes by giving a number of practical solutions to the challenge of treating culture as a variable in sociolinguistic research. These solutions are related to, amongst others, the reviewing process for journals, widespread norms of ‘good academic language’, author/editor selection, cross-cultural academic cooperation, and sharing of funds. |
topic |
cultural models sociolinguistics Anglowestern bias cultural criteria solutions |
url |
http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dicksmakman culturalbiasandsociolinguistics |
_version_ |
1724908960029343744 |