Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics

Peoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dick Smakman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2019-12-01
Series:Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692
id doaj-f2d9086b3ec84625b86022aa92ddc3e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2d9086b3ec84625b86022aa92ddc3e22020-11-25T02:12:31ZengPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN2312-91822312-92122019-12-0123192210.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-9-2217359Cultural bias and SociolinguisticsDick Smakman0Leiden University, Centre for LinguisticsPeoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural variation, which is visible in hierarchical social systems, belief systems, legal systems, traditions, attire, and all kinds of rituals. Communicative systems are part of culture, and they deserve a role in research focussing on language and communication. However, applying culture as a variable is a challenge, not only because of the cultural variation between peoples and individuals but also because the effects of culture on actual language utterances are hard to measure. Another issue is the dominance of Anglowestern cultural patterns in many analyses. This paper explains these issues and critically reviews the various criteria that well-known cultural models - like the one by Hofstede (1980), Lewis (1969), and Hall (1959, 1976) - use to categorise cultures. Examples of such criteria are: region, relationship with uncertainty, femininity/masculinity, and power relations. The paper concludes by giving a number of practical solutions to the challenge of treating culture as a variable in sociolinguistic research. These solutions are related to, amongst others, the reviewing process for journals, widespread norms of ‘good academic language’, author/editor selection, cross-cultural academic cooperation, and sharing of funds.http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692cultural modelssociolinguisticsAnglowestern biascultural criteriasolutions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dick Smakman
spellingShingle Dick Smakman
Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN
cultural models
sociolinguistics
Anglowestern bias
cultural criteria
solutions
author_facet Dick Smakman
author_sort Dick Smakman
title Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
title_short Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
title_full Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
title_fullStr Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
title_full_unstemmed Cultural bias and Sociolinguistics
title_sort cultural bias and sociolinguistics
publisher Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series Russian journal of linguistics: Vestnik RUDN
issn 2312-9182
2312-9212
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Peoples and individuals around the globe continuously develop their own communicative habits. With each generation, adjustments to changing circumstances are made - economic circumstances, natural circumstances, and, for instance, mobility circumstances. The outcome of such transitions is cultural variation, which is visible in hierarchical social systems, belief systems, legal systems, traditions, attire, and all kinds of rituals. Communicative systems are part of culture, and they deserve a role in research focussing on language and communication. However, applying culture as a variable is a challenge, not only because of the cultural variation between peoples and individuals but also because the effects of culture on actual language utterances are hard to measure. Another issue is the dominance of Anglowestern cultural patterns in many analyses. This paper explains these issues and critically reviews the various criteria that well-known cultural models - like the one by Hofstede (1980), Lewis (1969), and Hall (1959, 1976) - use to categorise cultures. Examples of such criteria are: region, relationship with uncertainty, femininity/masculinity, and power relations. The paper concludes by giving a number of practical solutions to the challenge of treating culture as a variable in sociolinguistic research. These solutions are related to, amongst others, the reviewing process for journals, widespread norms of ‘good academic language’, author/editor selection, cross-cultural academic cooperation, and sharing of funds.
topic cultural models
sociolinguistics
Anglowestern bias
cultural criteria
solutions
url http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/viewFile/20613/16692
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksmakman culturalbiasandsociolinguistics
_version_ 1724908960029343744