Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission

European social partner agreements negotiated on the basis of Article 155 TFEU may be implemented at the level of the European Union at the joint request of the parties via a Council decision. Unlike the autonomous implementation, this ‘institutional’ method transforms the agreement into an EU legal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dagmara Skupień
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2020-01-01
Series:Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/en/issue/1191/article/18898/
id doaj-f2d79e4d1de4423482be73217e9449b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2d79e4d1de4423482be73217e9449b92021-04-15T10:06:44ZengWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoActa Iuris Stetinensis2083-43732020-01-013210.18276/ais.2020.32-06Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the CommissionDagmara SkupieńEuropean social partner agreements negotiated on the basis of Article 155 TFEU may be implemented at the level of the European Union at the joint request of the parties via a Council decision. Unlike the autonomous implementation, this ‘institutional’ method transforms the agreement into an EU legal act. This text analyses the refusal of the European Commission to submit to the Council, an Agreement that establishes a general framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations and which was concluded within the EU Social Dialogue Committee for the Central Government Administration. It discusses the scope of the Commission’s competence to refuse to submit the agreement to the Council for implementation. Moreover, it presents a polemic on the judgment of the EU General Court that confirmed the European Commission’s broad scope of competence in refusing to submit to the Council a proposal for a decision to implement the agreement. The author argues that giving the Commission such a large margin of appreciation could undermine the European social dialogue. Moreover, the author explains why the above-mentioned Agreement should be implemented via a Council decision.https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/en/issue/1191/article/18898/Article 155 TFEUagreements of European social partnersimplementation of agreementsright to information and consultationpublic administration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dagmara Skupień
spellingShingle Dagmara Skupień
Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Article 155 TFEU
agreements of European social partners
implementation of agreements
right to information and consultation
public administration
author_facet Dagmara Skupień
author_sort Dagmara Skupień
title Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
title_short Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
title_full Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
title_fullStr Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
title_full_unstemmed Refusal to implement European social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the Commission
title_sort refusal to implement european social partners’ agreements: recent practice of the commission
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Acta Iuris Stetinensis
issn 2083-4373
publishDate 2020-01-01
description European social partner agreements negotiated on the basis of Article 155 TFEU may be implemented at the level of the European Union at the joint request of the parties via a Council decision. Unlike the autonomous implementation, this ‘institutional’ method transforms the agreement into an EU legal act. This text analyses the refusal of the European Commission to submit to the Council, an Agreement that establishes a general framework for informing and consulting civil servants and employees of central government administrations and which was concluded within the EU Social Dialogue Committee for the Central Government Administration. It discusses the scope of the Commission’s competence to refuse to submit the agreement to the Council for implementation. Moreover, it presents a polemic on the judgment of the EU General Court that confirmed the European Commission’s broad scope of competence in refusing to submit to the Council a proposal for a decision to implement the agreement. The author argues that giving the Commission such a large margin of appreciation could undermine the European social dialogue. Moreover, the author explains why the above-mentioned Agreement should be implemented via a Council decision.
topic Article 155 TFEU
agreements of European social partners
implementation of agreements
right to information and consultation
public administration
url https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/en/issue/1191/article/18898/
work_keys_str_mv AT dagmaraskupien refusaltoimplementeuropeansocialpartnersagreementsrecentpracticeofthecommission
_version_ 1721526493387948032