Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations

This essay addresses perceptions of time and temporality in legal rules and in legal knowledge under changing historical conditions. The first section treats the ongoing »temporal turn« in current debates (I). The second section discusses the notions of time in the 19th , 20th , and 21st centuries (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Thier
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2017-01-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg25_020thier.pdf
id doaj-f2bf3d94215b4007aa4cb1c0215c8240
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2bf3d94215b4007aa4cb1c0215c82402021-03-02T02:10:04ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172017-01-01Rg 25204410.12946/rg25/020-0441092Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and ConsiderationsAndreas Thier0University of ZurichThis essay addresses perceptions of time and temporality in legal rules and in legal knowledge under changing historical conditions. The first section treats the ongoing »temporal turn« in current debates (I). The second section discusses the notions of time in the 19th , 20th , and 21st centuries (II): Since the late 19th century, the perception of time has undergone a fundamental change. Contrary to the Newtonian tradition, time is no longer perceived as a universal and objective entity. Instead, a process of subjectivization of time has emerged. As a consequence, concepts like the idea of »social time« or »multiple times« have been discussed in the humanities and social sciences. The following section deals with the relationship between law, legal knowledge, and temporality in general (III): Legal rules and legal knowledge can only be understood with reference to temporal modes as the distinction between past / present / future. In this regard, time constitutes a sense- giving dimension of law. As a consequence, legal rules and legal knowledge serve as media of contemporary cultural practices of time and temporality. In this regard, the relationship between law and time is subject to historical change. Particular elements of temporality in the European legal tradition are dealt with in the next section (IV). While continuity and discontinuity as well as notions of eternity all appear as historical constants, how history and its relation to law are grasped is subject to change. This seems all the more true when it comes to our understanding of future, whereas acceleration and its impact on legal normativity show elements of stronger historical continuity.http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg25_020thier.pdftimefuturetemporalityrisk(dis-)continuity
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Thier
spellingShingle Andreas Thier
Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
time
future
temporality
risk
(dis-)continuity
author_facet Andreas Thier
author_sort Andreas Thier
title Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
title_short Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
title_full Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
title_fullStr Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Time, Law, and Legal History – Some Observations and Considerations
title_sort time, law, and legal history – some observations and considerations
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This essay addresses perceptions of time and temporality in legal rules and in legal knowledge under changing historical conditions. The first section treats the ongoing »temporal turn« in current debates (I). The second section discusses the notions of time in the 19th , 20th , and 21st centuries (II): Since the late 19th century, the perception of time has undergone a fundamental change. Contrary to the Newtonian tradition, time is no longer perceived as a universal and objective entity. Instead, a process of subjectivization of time has emerged. As a consequence, concepts like the idea of »social time« or »multiple times« have been discussed in the humanities and social sciences. The following section deals with the relationship between law, legal knowledge, and temporality in general (III): Legal rules and legal knowledge can only be understood with reference to temporal modes as the distinction between past / present / future. In this regard, time constitutes a sense- giving dimension of law. As a consequence, legal rules and legal knowledge serve as media of contemporary cultural practices of time and temporality. In this regard, the relationship between law and time is subject to historical change. Particular elements of temporality in the European legal tradition are dealt with in the next section (IV). While continuity and discontinuity as well as notions of eternity all appear as historical constants, how history and its relation to law are grasped is subject to change. This seems all the more true when it comes to our understanding of future, whereas acceleration and its impact on legal normativity show elements of stronger historical continuity.
topic time
future
temporality
risk
(dis-)continuity
url http://data.rg.mpg.de/rechtsgeschichte/rg25_020thier.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasthier timelawandlegalhistorysomeobservationsandconsiderations
_version_ 1724244486292242432