Transcultural Dialogue

Transcultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere Universi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen Keifer-Boyd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul 2018-12-01
Series:Revista Gearte
Subjects:
Online Access:https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347
id doaj-f2be610005084d36965c84c30e4cc131
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2be610005084d36965c84c30e4cc1312021-07-01T16:01:00ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulRevista Gearte2357-98542018-12-015310.22456/2357-9854.8934739516Transcultural DialogueKaren Keifer-Boyd0Pennsylvania State University — PSU, PennsylvaniaTranscultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and at the University of Helsinki. In this chapter, I present theories, concepts, strategies, and examples of Transcultural Dialogue concerning contemporary visual culture, cultural practices in relation to particular places, and a pedagogy designed to erode assumptions, ignorance, and misunderstandings. Pedagogical strategies of Transcultural Dialogue consider positionality, subjectivity, situated knowledge, transformative learning, intra-action, speculative standpoint, and diffractive methodology. The dialogic process elicits micro-cultural views that are specific and unique (i.e., they sustain difference), yet are shared within or part of macro-cultural knowledge. The act of meaning-making from micro-cultural practices can sustain as well as change the macro-cultural beliefs. Transcultural Dialogue is conversational performative cultural critique, collaborative artmaking, and commentary surrounding artworks by those involved in Transcultural Dialogue[1]. I have developed Transcultural Dialogue as a process that exposes systemic and environmental conditions, and approaches creativity as a social process.[1]    This chapter is developed from my 2017 InSEA keynote as published in the InSEA 2017 proceedings and several publications (KABIITO, LIAO, MOTTER & KEIFER-BOYD, 2014; KEIFER-BOYD, 2012, 2016; PAATELA-NIEMINEN & KEIFER-BOYD, 2015) in which I, along with co-facilitators, reflected on our process in order to improve future Transcultural Dialogue projects and to study educational impacts in relationship to pedagogical goals.https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen Keifer-Boyd
spellingShingle Karen Keifer-Boyd
Transcultural Dialogue
Revista Gearte
transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture.
author_facet Karen Keifer-Boyd
author_sort Karen Keifer-Boyd
title Transcultural Dialogue
title_short Transcultural Dialogue
title_full Transcultural Dialogue
title_fullStr Transcultural Dialogue
title_full_unstemmed Transcultural Dialogue
title_sort transcultural dialogue
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
series Revista Gearte
issn 2357-9854
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Transcultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and at the University of Helsinki. In this chapter, I present theories, concepts, strategies, and examples of Transcultural Dialogue concerning contemporary visual culture, cultural practices in relation to particular places, and a pedagogy designed to erode assumptions, ignorance, and misunderstandings. Pedagogical strategies of Transcultural Dialogue consider positionality, subjectivity, situated knowledge, transformative learning, intra-action, speculative standpoint, and diffractive methodology. The dialogic process elicits micro-cultural views that are specific and unique (i.e., they sustain difference), yet are shared within or part of macro-cultural knowledge. The act of meaning-making from micro-cultural practices can sustain as well as change the macro-cultural beliefs. Transcultural Dialogue is conversational performative cultural critique, collaborative artmaking, and commentary surrounding artworks by those involved in Transcultural Dialogue[1]. I have developed Transcultural Dialogue as a process that exposes systemic and environmental conditions, and approaches creativity as a social process.[1]    This chapter is developed from my 2017 InSEA keynote as published in the InSEA 2017 proceedings and several publications (KABIITO, LIAO, MOTTER & KEIFER-BOYD, 2014; KEIFER-BOYD, 2012, 2016; PAATELA-NIEMINEN & KEIFER-BOYD, 2015) in which I, along with co-facilitators, reflected on our process in order to improve future Transcultural Dialogue projects and to study educational impacts in relationship to pedagogical goals.
topic transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture.
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347
work_keys_str_mv AT karenkeiferboyd transculturaldialogue
_version_ 1721346660674568192