Transcultural Dialogue
Transcultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere Universi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Gearte |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347 |
id |
doaj-f2be610005084d36965c84c30e4cc131 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2be610005084d36965c84c30e4cc1312021-07-01T16:01:00ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulRevista Gearte2357-98542018-12-015310.22456/2357-9854.8934739516Transcultural DialogueKaren Keifer-Boyd0Pennsylvania State University — PSU, PennsylvaniaTranscultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and at the University of Helsinki. In this chapter, I present theories, concepts, strategies, and examples of Transcultural Dialogue concerning contemporary visual culture, cultural practices in relation to particular places, and a pedagogy designed to erode assumptions, ignorance, and misunderstandings. Pedagogical strategies of Transcultural Dialogue consider positionality, subjectivity, situated knowledge, transformative learning, intra-action, speculative standpoint, and diffractive methodology. The dialogic process elicits micro-cultural views that are specific and unique (i.e., they sustain difference), yet are shared within or part of macro-cultural knowledge. The act of meaning-making from micro-cultural practices can sustain as well as change the macro-cultural beliefs. Transcultural Dialogue is conversational performative cultural critique, collaborative artmaking, and commentary surrounding artworks by those involved in Transcultural Dialogue[1]. I have developed Transcultural Dialogue as a process that exposes systemic and environmental conditions, and approaches creativity as a social process.[1] This chapter is developed from my 2017 InSEA keynote as published in the InSEA 2017 proceedings and several publications (KABIITO, LIAO, MOTTER & KEIFER-BOYD, 2014; KEIFER-BOYD, 2012, 2016; PAATELA-NIEMINEN & KEIFER-BOYD, 2015) in which I, along with co-facilitators, reflected on our process in order to improve future Transcultural Dialogue projects and to study educational impacts in relationship to pedagogical goals.https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Karen Keifer-Boyd |
spellingShingle |
Karen Keifer-Boyd Transcultural Dialogue Revista Gearte transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture. |
author_facet |
Karen Keifer-Boyd |
author_sort |
Karen Keifer-Boyd |
title |
Transcultural Dialogue |
title_short |
Transcultural Dialogue |
title_full |
Transcultural Dialogue |
title_fullStr |
Transcultural Dialogue |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transcultural Dialogue |
title_sort |
transcultural dialogue |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
series |
Revista Gearte |
issn |
2357-9854 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Transcultural Dialogue builds relationships, which becomes the content for a community to create collaborative art based on the group’s dialogue. As an art education professor in the United States, I began facilitating Transcultural Dialogues in 2007 with students and colleagues at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and at the University of Helsinki. In this chapter, I present theories, concepts, strategies, and examples of Transcultural Dialogue concerning contemporary visual culture, cultural practices in relation to particular places, and a pedagogy designed to erode assumptions, ignorance, and misunderstandings. Pedagogical strategies of Transcultural Dialogue consider positionality, subjectivity, situated knowledge, transformative learning, intra-action, speculative standpoint, and diffractive methodology. The dialogic process elicits micro-cultural views that are specific and unique (i.e., they sustain difference), yet are shared within or part of macro-cultural knowledge. The act of meaning-making from micro-cultural practices can sustain as well as change the macro-cultural beliefs. Transcultural Dialogue is conversational performative cultural critique, collaborative artmaking, and commentary surrounding artworks by those involved in Transcultural Dialogue[1]. I have developed Transcultural Dialogue as a process that exposes systemic and environmental conditions, and approaches creativity as a social process.[1] This chapter is developed from my 2017 InSEA keynote as published in the InSEA 2017 proceedings and several publications (KABIITO, LIAO, MOTTER & KEIFER-BOYD, 2014; KEIFER-BOYD, 2012, 2016; PAATELA-NIEMINEN & KEIFER-BOYD, 2015) in which I, along with co-facilitators, reflected on our process in order to improve future Transcultural Dialogue projects and to study educational impacts in relationship to pedagogical goals. |
topic |
transformative learning. situated knowledge. visual culture. |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/gearte/article/view/89347 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karenkeiferboyd transculturaldialogue |
_version_ |
1721346660674568192 |