Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity
In this paper the authors argue that there are three modes of educational action research: emancipatory, practical, and knowledge generating. Furthermore, they suggest that much of action research, although predicated on notions of emancipatory research, is often not primarily emancipatory in nature...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2008-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700402 |
id |
doaj-f2b57e5d09394832b0d7e9bd8b7dbe87 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2b57e5d09394832b0d7e9bd8b7dbe872020-11-25T03:43:00ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692008-12-01710.1177/16094069080070040210.1177_160940690800700402Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research ValidityPaul Newton PhDDavid Burgess PhDIn this paper the authors argue that there are three modes of educational action research: emancipatory, practical, and knowledge generating. Furthermore, they suggest that much of action research, although predicated on notions of emancipatory research, is often not primarily emancipatory in nature. There are considerable risks involved when action research fails to adequately justify its truth claims because of a dependence on validities that primarily assess the emancipatory features of the research. Consequently, the authors propose that the various modes of action research require emphasis on different validities that are dependent on the purposes of the research. In doing this, they offer a reconceptualization of Anderson and Herr's (1999) influential approach to validity in action research.https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700402 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul Newton PhD David Burgess PhD |
spellingShingle |
Paul Newton PhD David Burgess PhD Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
author_facet |
Paul Newton PhD David Burgess PhD |
author_sort |
Paul Newton PhD |
title |
Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity |
title_short |
Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity |
title_full |
Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity |
title_fullStr |
Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity |
title_sort |
exploring types of educational action research: implications for research validity |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
issn |
1609-4069 |
publishDate |
2008-12-01 |
description |
In this paper the authors argue that there are three modes of educational action research: emancipatory, practical, and knowledge generating. Furthermore, they suggest that much of action research, although predicated on notions of emancipatory research, is often not primarily emancipatory in nature. There are considerable risks involved when action research fails to adequately justify its truth claims because of a dependence on validities that primarily assess the emancipatory features of the research. Consequently, the authors propose that the various modes of action research require emphasis on different validities that are dependent on the purposes of the research. In doing this, they offer a reconceptualization of Anderson and Herr's (1999) influential approach to validity in action research. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700402 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulnewtonphd exploringtypesofeducationalactionresearchimplicationsforresearchvalidity AT davidburgessphd exploringtypesofeducationalactionresearchimplicationsforresearchvalidity |
_version_ |
1724522004435959808 |