The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study

Objective: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of life (QoL) and its relationship with social support of nurses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 241 nurses working at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. The instruments used in this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Shojaei, Maryam Puryaghoob, Malihe Babahaji, Somayye Ghavipanje Rezaei, Samira Jafari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Industrial Psychiatry Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.industrialpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0972-6748;year=2019;volume=28;issue=2;spage=242;epage=247;aulast=
id doaj-f29f126da50d462eafc43150ad4a6c8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f29f126da50d462eafc43150ad4a6c8e2020-11-25T03:18:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndustrial Psychiatry Journal0972-67480976-27952019-01-0128224224710.4103/ipj.ipj_29_20The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional studyFatemeh ShojaeiMaryam PuryaghoobMalihe BabahajiSomayye Ghavipanje RezaeiSamira JafariObjective: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of life (QoL) and its relationship with social support of nurses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 241 nurses working at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. The instruments used in this study were the Persian SF-36 tool, McCain Marquin Social Interaction Questionnaire, and information on individual and job characteristics. The sampling method was cluster sampling with probability proportional to population size. The information was analyzed using SPSS version 18 and with proportional statistics. Results: Only 31.6% (67) of the nurses had high levels of social support. The average social support was 47/65 ± 93/6. The highest mean score of QoL 67.75 ± 25.023 was related to physical activity and the lowest score mean were related to dimensions of bodily pain (54.59 ±22.727) and role limitations because of physical health problems (59.60 ± 40.261). In the linear regression model with the Enter method, the adjustment of the effects of the variables of the three dimensions of general health, mental health and happiness, and QoL was associated with social support. Conclusion: The majority of nurses have moderate social support and poor QoL for nurses. Therefore, considering the effects of nurse support, it is recommended to perform supportive interventions and plan for more well-being of nurses.http://www.industrialpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0972-6748;year=2019;volume=28;issue=2;spage=242;epage=247;aulast=general healthhappiness and vitalitymental healthnursesquality of lifesocial support
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatemeh Shojaei
Maryam Puryaghoob
Malihe Babahaji
Somayye Ghavipanje Rezaei
Samira Jafari
spellingShingle Fatemeh Shojaei
Maryam Puryaghoob
Malihe Babahaji
Somayye Ghavipanje Rezaei
Samira Jafari
The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
Industrial Psychiatry Journal
general health
happiness and vitality
mental health
nurses
quality of life
social support
author_facet Fatemeh Shojaei
Maryam Puryaghoob
Malihe Babahaji
Somayye Ghavipanje Rezaei
Samira Jafari
author_sort Fatemeh Shojaei
title The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
title_short The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
title_full The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: A cross-sectional study
title_sort relationship between quality of life and social support among nurses: a cross-sectional study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Industrial Psychiatry Journal
issn 0972-6748
0976-2795
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of life (QoL) and its relationship with social support of nurses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 241 nurses working at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. The instruments used in this study were the Persian SF-36 tool, McCain Marquin Social Interaction Questionnaire, and information on individual and job characteristics. The sampling method was cluster sampling with probability proportional to population size. The information was analyzed using SPSS version 18 and with proportional statistics. Results: Only 31.6% (67) of the nurses had high levels of social support. The average social support was 47/65 ± 93/6. The highest mean score of QoL 67.75 ± 25.023 was related to physical activity and the lowest score mean were related to dimensions of bodily pain (54.59 ±22.727) and role limitations because of physical health problems (59.60 ± 40.261). In the linear regression model with the Enter method, the adjustment of the effects of the variables of the three dimensions of general health, mental health and happiness, and QoL was associated with social support. Conclusion: The majority of nurses have moderate social support and poor QoL for nurses. Therefore, considering the effects of nurse support, it is recommended to perform supportive interventions and plan for more well-being of nurses.
topic general health
happiness and vitality
mental health
nurses
quality of life
social support
url http://www.industrialpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0972-6748;year=2019;volume=28;issue=2;spage=242;epage=247;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehshojaei therelationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT maryampuryaghoob therelationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT malihebabahaji therelationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT somayyeghavipanjerezaei therelationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT samirajafari therelationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT fatemehshojaei relationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT maryampuryaghoob relationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT malihebabahaji relationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT somayyeghavipanjerezaei relationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
AT samirajafari relationshipbetweenqualityoflifeandsocialsupportamongnursesacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724625418455089152