Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model

Evaluating the climatology and interannual variability of storm tracks in climate models represents an excellent way to evaluate their ability to simulate synoptic-scale phenomena. We generate storm tracks from the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System (CFS) mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy Paul Eichler, Francisco Alvarez, Jon Gottschalck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720545
id doaj-f281806410ee46fc99fcef90d9961aa1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f281806410ee46fc99fcef90d9961aa12020-11-25T00:55:26ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172015-01-01201510.1155/2015/720545720545Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS ModelTimothy Paul Eichler0Francisco Alvarez1Jon Gottschalck2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, 3642 Lindell Boulevard, O’Neil Hall 205, St. Louis, MO 63108, USADepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, 3642 Lindell Boulevard, O’Neil Hall 205, St. Louis, MO 63108, USANOAA/National Weather Service, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Climate Prediction Center, 5830 University Research Court, College Park, MD 20740, USAEvaluating the climatology and interannual variability of storm tracks in climate models represents an excellent way to evaluate their ability to simulate synoptic-scale phenomena. We generate storm tracks from the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System (CFS) model for the northern hemisphere (NH) and compare them to storm tracks generated from NCEP’s reanalysis I data, the European Centre for Medium Range Prediction (ECMWF) ERA40 data, and CFS reanalysis data. To assess interannual variability, we analyze the impacts of El Niño, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). We show that the CFS model is capable of simulating realistic storm tracks for frequency and intensity in the NH. The CFS storm tracks exhibit a reasonable response to El Niño and the NAO. However, it did not capture interannual variability for the IOD. Since one path by which storm tracks respond to external forcing is via Rossby waves due to anomalous heating, the CFS model may not be able to capture this effect especially since anomalous heating for the IOD is more local than El Niño. Our assessment is that the CFS model’s storm track response is sensitive to the strength of external forcing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720545
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy Paul Eichler
Francisco Alvarez
Jon Gottschalck
spellingShingle Timothy Paul Eichler
Francisco Alvarez
Jon Gottschalck
Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
Advances in Meteorology
author_facet Timothy Paul Eichler
Francisco Alvarez
Jon Gottschalck
author_sort Timothy Paul Eichler
title Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
title_short Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
title_full Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
title_fullStr Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
title_full_unstemmed Northern Hemisphere Climatology and Interannual Variability of Storm Tracks in NCEP’s CFS Model
title_sort northern hemisphere climatology and interannual variability of storm tracks in ncep’s cfs model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Meteorology
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Evaluating the climatology and interannual variability of storm tracks in climate models represents an excellent way to evaluate their ability to simulate synoptic-scale phenomena. We generate storm tracks from the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System (CFS) model for the northern hemisphere (NH) and compare them to storm tracks generated from NCEP’s reanalysis I data, the European Centre for Medium Range Prediction (ECMWF) ERA40 data, and CFS reanalysis data. To assess interannual variability, we analyze the impacts of El Niño, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). We show that the CFS model is capable of simulating realistic storm tracks for frequency and intensity in the NH. The CFS storm tracks exhibit a reasonable response to El Niño and the NAO. However, it did not capture interannual variability for the IOD. Since one path by which storm tracks respond to external forcing is via Rossby waves due to anomalous heating, the CFS model may not be able to capture this effect especially since anomalous heating for the IOD is more local than El Niño. Our assessment is that the CFS model’s storm track response is sensitive to the strength of external forcing.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720545
work_keys_str_mv AT timothypauleichler northernhemisphereclimatologyandinterannualvariabilityofstormtracksinncepscfsmodel
AT franciscoalvarez northernhemisphereclimatologyandinterannualvariabilityofstormtracksinncepscfsmodel
AT jongottschalck northernhemisphereclimatologyandinterannualvariabilityofstormtracksinncepscfsmodel
_version_ 1725230427890778112