Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication

Abstract Introduction A Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) sent in Denmark on 11 August 2011 provided information on new pioglitazone labelling and guidance on monitoring treatment effectiveness. We describe pioglitazone use in Denmark after the DHPC, estimate the incidence of heart...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javier Cid Ruzafa, Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen, Dimitri Bennett, Vera Ehrenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2019-08-01
Series:Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40801-019-0160-6
id doaj-f26f531dda074aa08f54e74e4239463d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f26f531dda074aa08f54e74e4239463d2020-11-25T04:03:53ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareDrugs - Real World Outcomes2199-11542198-97882019-08-016313314010.1007/s40801-019-0160-6Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional CommunicationJavier Cid Ruzafa0Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen1Dimitri Bennett2Vera Ehrenstein3Real World Evidence, EvideraDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company LimitedDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Introduction A Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) sent in Denmark on 11 August 2011 provided information on new pioglitazone labelling and guidance on monitoring treatment effectiveness. We describe pioglitazone use in Denmark after the DHPC, estimate the incidence of heart failure (HF), quantify pioglitazone cessation following a diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) or uninvestigated macroscopic haematuria, and describe glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values. Methods This was a cohort study. From Danish population-based registries, cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus incident or prevalent users of pioglitazone or insulin in 2011–2015 were created. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, laboratory results (available for a regional subset of the population), and incidence rates of HF and BC were estimated. Results There were 80 pioglitazone and 17,699 insulin incident users, 140 pioglitazone and 13,183 insulin prevalent users. There were no new BC cases among incident pioglitazone users, and < 5 new BC cases among prevalent pioglitazone users. Pioglitazone was rarely the first-line treatment. History of haematuria was documented in < 5 incident and 11 prevalent pioglitazone users. During follow-up, there were < 5 HF cases among 77 incident pioglitazone users and < 5 among 133 prevalent pioglitazone users without a history of HF. Median HbA1c at index date was 7.8% and 8.8% in incident pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, and 7.5% and 7.6% in prevalent pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, respectively. During follow-up of up to 4.4 years, 28.8% incident and 20.7% prevalent pioglitazone users discontinued pioglitazone. Conclusions Numbers of pioglitazone users in Denmark were low and decreased over time. Risks of BC or HF were low and risk estimates imprecise.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40801-019-0160-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javier Cid Ruzafa
Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen
Dimitri Bennett
Vera Ehrenstein
spellingShingle Javier Cid Ruzafa
Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen
Dimitri Bennett
Vera Ehrenstein
Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
author_facet Javier Cid Ruzafa
Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen
Dimitri Bennett
Vera Ehrenstein
author_sort Javier Cid Ruzafa
title Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
title_short Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
title_full Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
title_fullStr Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
title_full_unstemmed Post-authorisation Safety Study of Pioglitazone Use and Safety Endpoints of Interest in Denmark After Direct Healthcare Professional Communication
title_sort post-authorisation safety study of pioglitazone use and safety endpoints of interest in denmark after direct healthcare professional communication
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
series Drugs - Real World Outcomes
issn 2199-1154
2198-9788
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Introduction A Direct Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) sent in Denmark on 11 August 2011 provided information on new pioglitazone labelling and guidance on monitoring treatment effectiveness. We describe pioglitazone use in Denmark after the DHPC, estimate the incidence of heart failure (HF), quantify pioglitazone cessation following a diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) or uninvestigated macroscopic haematuria, and describe glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values. Methods This was a cohort study. From Danish population-based registries, cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus incident or prevalent users of pioglitazone or insulin in 2011–2015 were created. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, laboratory results (available for a regional subset of the population), and incidence rates of HF and BC were estimated. Results There were 80 pioglitazone and 17,699 insulin incident users, 140 pioglitazone and 13,183 insulin prevalent users. There were no new BC cases among incident pioglitazone users, and < 5 new BC cases among prevalent pioglitazone users. Pioglitazone was rarely the first-line treatment. History of haematuria was documented in < 5 incident and 11 prevalent pioglitazone users. During follow-up, there were < 5 HF cases among 77 incident pioglitazone users and < 5 among 133 prevalent pioglitazone users without a history of HF. Median HbA1c at index date was 7.8% and 8.8% in incident pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, and 7.5% and 7.6% in prevalent pioglitazone and insulin cohorts, respectively. During follow-up of up to 4.4 years, 28.8% incident and 20.7% prevalent pioglitazone users discontinued pioglitazone. Conclusions Numbers of pioglitazone users in Denmark were low and decreased over time. Risks of BC or HF were low and risk estimates imprecise.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40801-019-0160-6
work_keys_str_mv AT javiercidruzafa postauthorisationsafetystudyofpioglitazoneuseandsafetyendpointsofinterestindenmarkafterdirecthealthcareprofessionalcommunication
AT sinnapilgaardulrichsen postauthorisationsafetystudyofpioglitazoneuseandsafetyendpointsofinterestindenmarkafterdirecthealthcareprofessionalcommunication
AT dimitribennett postauthorisationsafetystudyofpioglitazoneuseandsafetyendpointsofinterestindenmarkafterdirecthealthcareprofessionalcommunication
AT veraehrenstein postauthorisationsafetystudyofpioglitazoneuseandsafetyendpointsofinterestindenmarkafterdirecthealthcareprofessionalcommunication
_version_ 1724438693695979520