Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework

Recognition of reflexivity in psychology does not solve a problem so much as create new challenges for practitioners concerned with the meaning and quality of subjects' actions. Whereas mainstream psychologists seek to reduce or eliminate researcher bias in order to study independent, real worl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gavin B. Sullivan
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2002-09-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/833
id doaj-f2521f619e184cdb81601a0218fba8ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2521f619e184cdb81601a0218fba8ed2020-11-24T22:51:31ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272002-09-0133820Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian FrameworkGavin B. Sullivan0Monash UniversityRecognition of reflexivity in psychology does not solve a problem so much as create new challenges for practitioners concerned with the meaning and quality of subjects' actions. Whereas mainstream psychologists seek to reduce or eliminate researcher bias in order to study independent, real world phenomena, qualitative researchers from the same discipline recognize the irreducible impact of the language, theories and experiences that co-create those phenomena. It is possible, of course, that the results of a particular method have implications for or even reveal more about the subjectivity of the researcher than the research "subject." In this paper, I explore similar issues about subjectivity that arise in the area of philosophical biography and then engage reflexively with the later philosophy of WITTGENSTEIN (1953) in order to provide an appropriate framework for qualitative work. The consistency of the account is further enhanced by using the example of my own work on pride to address several different meanings of reflexivity and to explore the implications of individual subjectivity for the research "process" and "product." The results will show, it is hoped, that exploration of reflexivity-subjectivity issues does not lead to paradox, indecision or conceptual morass and also indicate how WITTGENSTEIN's "therapeutic" approach clarifies and dissolves many of these problems. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203204http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/833Wittgensteinphilosophical biographyreflexivitysubjectivitypsychologysocial constructionismqualitative research
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gavin B. Sullivan
spellingShingle Gavin B. Sullivan
Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Wittgenstein
philosophical biography
reflexivity
subjectivity
psychology
social constructionism
qualitative research
author_facet Gavin B. Sullivan
author_sort Gavin B. Sullivan
title Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
title_short Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
title_full Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
title_fullStr Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
title_full_unstemmed Reflexivity and Subjectivity in Qualitative Research: The Utility of a Wittgensteinian Framework
title_sort reflexivity and subjectivity in qualitative research: the utility of a wittgensteinian framework
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2002-09-01
description Recognition of reflexivity in psychology does not solve a problem so much as create new challenges for practitioners concerned with the meaning and quality of subjects' actions. Whereas mainstream psychologists seek to reduce or eliminate researcher bias in order to study independent, real world phenomena, qualitative researchers from the same discipline recognize the irreducible impact of the language, theories and experiences that co-create those phenomena. It is possible, of course, that the results of a particular method have implications for or even reveal more about the subjectivity of the researcher than the research "subject." In this paper, I explore similar issues about subjectivity that arise in the area of philosophical biography and then engage reflexively with the later philosophy of WITTGENSTEIN (1953) in order to provide an appropriate framework for qualitative work. The consistency of the account is further enhanced by using the example of my own work on pride to address several different meanings of reflexivity and to explore the implications of individual subjectivity for the research "process" and "product." The results will show, it is hoped, that exploration of reflexivity-subjectivity issues does not lead to paradox, indecision or conceptual morass and also indicate how WITTGENSTEIN's "therapeutic" approach clarifies and dissolves many of these problems. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203204
topic Wittgenstein
philosophical biography
reflexivity
subjectivity
psychology
social constructionism
qualitative research
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/833
work_keys_str_mv AT gavinbsullivan reflexivityandsubjectivityinqualitativeresearchtheutilityofawittgensteinianframework
_version_ 1725669380862246912