An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys

In this article, we investigate the relationship between interviewer travel behavior and field outcomes, such as contact rates, response rates, and contact attempts in two studies, the National Survey of Family Growth and the Health and Retirement Study. Using call record paradata that have been agg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wagner James, Olson Kristen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Official Statistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2018-0010
id doaj-f24f9c4d8ab94249bd104cce569382e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f24f9c4d8ab94249bd104cce569382e72021-09-06T19:40:52ZengSciendoJournal of Official Statistics2001-73672018-03-0134121123710.1515/jos-2018-0010jos-2018-0010An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field SurveysWagner James0Olson Kristen1University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 426 Thompson St. Room 4050, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USAUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Sociology, 703 Oldfather Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588, USAIn this article, we investigate the relationship between interviewer travel behavior and field outcomes, such as contact rates, response rates, and contact attempts in two studies, the National Survey of Family Growth and the Health and Retirement Study. Using call record paradata that have been aggregated to interviewer-day levels, we examine two important cost drivers as measures of interviewer travel behavior: the distance that interviewers travel to segments and the number of segments visited on an interviewer-day. We explore several predictors of these measures of travel - the geographic size of the sampled areas, measures of urbanicity, and other sample and interviewer characteristics. We also explore the relationship between travel and field outcomes, such as the number of contact attempts made and response rates.We find that the number of segments that are visited on each interviewer-day has a strong association with field outcomes, but the number of miles travelled does not. These findings suggest that survey organizations should routinely monitor the number of segments that interviewers visit, and that more direct measurement of interviewer travel behavior is needed.https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2018-0010interviewer travelsurvey costsnonresponseparadata
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wagner James
Olson Kristen
spellingShingle Wagner James
Olson Kristen
An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
Journal of Official Statistics
interviewer travel
survey costs
nonresponse
paradata
author_facet Wagner James
Olson Kristen
author_sort Wagner James
title An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
title_short An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
title_full An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
title_fullStr An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys
title_sort analysis of interviewer travel and field outcomes in two field surveys
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Official Statistics
issn 2001-7367
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In this article, we investigate the relationship between interviewer travel behavior and field outcomes, such as contact rates, response rates, and contact attempts in two studies, the National Survey of Family Growth and the Health and Retirement Study. Using call record paradata that have been aggregated to interviewer-day levels, we examine two important cost drivers as measures of interviewer travel behavior: the distance that interviewers travel to segments and the number of segments visited on an interviewer-day. We explore several predictors of these measures of travel - the geographic size of the sampled areas, measures of urbanicity, and other sample and interviewer characteristics. We also explore the relationship between travel and field outcomes, such as the number of contact attempts made and response rates.We find that the number of segments that are visited on each interviewer-day has a strong association with field outcomes, but the number of miles travelled does not. These findings suggest that survey organizations should routinely monitor the number of segments that interviewers visit, and that more direct measurement of interviewer travel behavior is needed.
topic interviewer travel
survey costs
nonresponse
paradata
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2018-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerjames ananalysisofinterviewertravelandfieldoutcomesintwofieldsurveys
AT olsonkristen ananalysisofinterviewertravelandfieldoutcomesintwofieldsurveys
AT wagnerjames analysisofinterviewertravelandfieldoutcomesintwofieldsurveys
AT olsonkristen analysisofinterviewertravelandfieldoutcomesintwofieldsurveys
_version_ 1717767620415979520